Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18407924 | CIRCADIAN RHYTHM-BASED TRAINING DATA CORRECTION FOR DROWSINESS DETECTION SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS | January 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18493256 | DRIVER RECOGNITION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF | October 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18270420 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING THE POSE OF A LOCALIZING APPARATUS USING REFLECTIVE LANDMARKS AND OTHER FEATURES | June 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18198398 | AUTOREGISTRATION OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL DIGITAL STRUCTURES | May 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18309649 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENCODING SENSOR DATA TAGGED WITH GEOLOCATION DATA | April 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18136260 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CONDITIONAL NEURAL FLOORPLANS FOR STATIC-DYNAMIC DISENTANGLEMENT | April 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18301372 | COUNTERFEIT DETECTION USING IMAGE ANALYSIS | April 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18194728 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR USING MULTI-SENSOR CONSENSUS TO FILTER-OUT ARTIFACTS FROM POINT CLOUD DATA | April 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18194101 | POSITIONING SYSTEM BASED ON STREET VIEW INFORMATION AND SELF-POSITIONING CORRECTION METHOD | March 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18246348 | METHOD FOR PROCESSING CELL IMAGE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | March 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18187681 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, MOVING OBJECT, SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND SERVER | March 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18180643 | ABSOLUTE DEPTH ESTIMATION FROM A SINGLE IMAGE USING ONLINE DEPTH SCALE TRANSFER | March 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18175264 | HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE ANALYSIS USING MACHINE LEARNING | February 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18155952 | IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS THAT IMPROVES COMPRESSION EFFICIENCY OF IMAGE DATA, METHOD OF CONTROLLING SAME, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | January 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18090404 | METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR AMOUNT OF OBJECT USING TWO DIMENSIONAL IMAGE | December 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18089712 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR DETECTING REAR SURFACE OF TARGET VEHICLE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF | December 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18082860 | ESTIMATING RELATIVE POSE LEVERAGING LANE MARKERS | December 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17928379 | Vector Map Verification | November 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17988328 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMAGE ALIGNMENT AND AUGMENTATION | November 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17968541 | SELF-SUPERVISED JOINT IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION AND COIL SENSITIVITY CALIBRATION IN PARALLEL MRI WITHOUT GROUND TRUTH | October 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17912725 | ENDOSCOPE PROCESSOR AND ENDOSCOPE SYSTEM | September 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17717343 | Detecting a Moving Stream of Objects | April 2022 | March 2026 | Abandon | 47 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17683379 | METHOD OF PROCESSING OPHTHALMIC DATA, OPHTHALMIC DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND OPHTHALMIC EXAMINATION APPARATUS | March 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17453707 | LiDAR SYSTEM INCLUDING OBJECT MOVEMENT DETECTION | November 2021 | February 2026 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17482795 | ABANDONED OBJECT DETECTION | September 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17473332 | DISINFECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD | September 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 48 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17443324 | SURVEYING SYSTEM, SURVEYING METHOD, AND SURVEYING PROGRAM | July 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 51 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner OMETZ, RACHEL ANNE works in Art Unit 2668 and has examined 4 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 50.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 51 months.
Examiner OMETZ, RACHEL ANNE's allowance rate of 50.0% places them in the 12% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by OMETZ, RACHEL ANNE receive 1.25 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 16% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by OMETZ, RACHEL ANNE is 51 months. This places the examiner in the 4% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 22% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 28% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.