Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18637325 | METHODS FOR SAMPLING SYNTHETIC DEFECT IMAGE GENERATION | April 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18623036 | HAND TRACKING SYSTEM AND METHOD | April 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18592904 | METHOD FOR LASER PROCESSING AND LASER PROCESSING SYSTEM | March 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18437080 | AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF PHYSICAL OBJECTS USING IMMUTABLE PHYSICAL CODE | February 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18412379 | IMAGE ENHANCEMENT METHOD, DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM | January 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18523607 | DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING LIGHT RECEIVING ELEMENTS AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME | November 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 22 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18558475 | CAMERA DEVICE FOR MONITORING AND RECOGNISING ANIMALS OR PORTIONS THEREOF, AND ASSOCIATED LIVESTOCK SHED | November 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18495268 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR RECOMMENDING A DESIRED VEHICLE TOPCOAT WHEN THE BODY COLOR DOES NOT MATCH | October 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18374464 | DETECTION OF INAPPROPRIATE LANGUAGE AND/OR IMAGERY FOR PREVENTION OF DISPLAY ON QUICK SERVICE RESTAURANT SIGNAGE | September 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18371699 | BODY FLUID VOLUME ESTIMATION DEVICE, BODY FLUID VOLUME ESTIMATION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM | September 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18371709 | BODY FLUID VOLUME ESTIMATION DEVICE, BODY FLUID VOLUME ESTIMATION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM | September 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18361752 | AI-BASED CELL CLASSIFICATION METHOD AND SYSTEM | July 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18353417 | OMITTED BONE ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES FOR SURGICAL PLANNING | July 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18216806 | BODY FLUID VOLUME ESTIMATION DEVICE, BODY FLUID VOLUME ESTIMATION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM | June 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18333256 | CONTROL METHOD FOR TEST SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD FOR SMEAR PREPARATION DEVICE, TEST SYSTEM, AND SMEAR PREPARATION DEVICE | June 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18039008 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ASSISTANT DEVICE AND SYSTEM BASED ON DOOR IMAGE ANALYSIS | May 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18198970 | APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING AN OPTIMIZED IMPLANT POSITION USING A KINEMATIC AND INVERSE DYNAMICS MODEL AND APPLYING MOTION CAPTURE DATA | May 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17998142 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A SMART PRODUCT HANDOFF INTEGRATED PLATFORM | May 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18198070 | REMOTE SENSING AND SOCIAL SENSING FOR FLOOD MAPPING | May 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18318190 | MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING APPARATUS, PHASE CORRECTING METHOD, AND IMAGING CONTROLLING METHOD | May 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18247892 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING ATHEROSCLEROTIC PATHOLOGICAL TISSUE TYPES IN A CORONARY ARTERY OCT IMAGE USING TRAINED ENGINES | April 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18118954 | INTERSECT COMMAND VISION LOCATING SYSTEM AND METHOD | March 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18170902 | VISION PROCESSING AND MODEL TRAINING METHOD, DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM AND PROGRAM PRODUCT | February 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17948471 | VEHICLE IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM | September 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17946099 | DETECTION DEVICE DETECTING GAZE POINT OF USER, CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING CONTROL PROGRAM THEREFOR | September 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17857444 | METHOD FOR GENERATING AND RECOGNIZING DEFORMABLE OF FIDUCIAL MARKERS BASED ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN END-TO-END MANNER AND SYSTEM THEREOF | July 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17839961 | COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM STORING PERSON IDENTIFICATION MACHINE LEARNING PROGRAM, PERSON IDENTIFICATION MACHINE LEARNING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS | June 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14457612 | TECHNOLOGIES FOR VIDEO-BASED COMMERCE | August 2014 | January 2017 | Allow | 29 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14191239 | Device For Delivery Service | February 2014 | October 2017 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14153304 | PRICING DATA ACCORDING TO PROVENANCE-BASED USE IN A QUERY | January 2014 | July 2017 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14145811 | GUARANTY PROVISIONING VIA WIRELESS SERVICE PURVEYANCE | December 2013 | July 2017 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14137385 | ATTRIBUTION MODELING USING REGRESSION ANALYSIS | December 2013 | October 2017 | Allow | 46 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14085560 | HANDLING AND PROCESSING OF MASSIVE NUMBERS OF PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS IN REAL TIME | November 2013 | March 2018 | Allow | 52 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14066580 | FACILITATING GUARANTY PROVISIONING FOR AN EXCHANGE | October 2013 | November 2017 | Allow | 48 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner SHUI, MING works in Art Unit 2663 and has examined 7 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.
Examiner SHUI, MING's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by SHUI, MING receive 2.86 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 83% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SHUI, MING is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 14% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SHUI, MING. This interview benefit is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 37.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 86% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 14.3% of allowed cases (in the 96% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 28% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.