USPTO Examiner SHAH PARAS D - Art Unit 2659

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
16972420INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODDecember 2020March 2024Allow4040YesNo
17110519RUNTIME TOPIC CHANGE ANALYSES IN SPOKEN DIALOG CONTEXTSDecember 2020March 2024Abandon4040YesNo
17109265MULTI-MODE GUARD FOR VOICE COMMANDSDecember 2020April 2023Abandon2920YesNo
17074653Estimating Lung Volume by Speech AnalysisOctober 2020December 2022Allow2520YesNo
17061532ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PROCESSING USER UTTERANCE AND METHOD OF OPERATING SAMEOctober 2020September 2024Abandon4850YesNo
17060339DETECTION OF LIVENESSOctober 2020January 2023Allow2820NoNo
17037975DECT BASE STATION, HANDSET AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMSeptember 2020February 2024Allow4140NoNo
17016360SPEECH RECOGNITION USING DATA ANALYSIS AND DILATION OF SPEECH CONTENT FROM SEPARATED AUDIO INPUTSeptember 2020April 2022Allow1910NoNo
17014458SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RESPONSE SELECTION IN MULTI-PARTY CONVERSATIONS WITH DYNAMIC TOPIC TRACKINGSeptember 2020October 2022Allow2510YesNo
16978586METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING AND IMPROVING BEHAVIORAL INDEXSeptember 2020November 2022Allow2720YesNo
16977102INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, PROGRAM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMSeptember 2020February 2023Abandon2920NoNo
17002195CONVOLUTIONAL STATE MODELING FOR PLANNING NATURAL LANGUAGE CONVERSATIONSAugust 2020September 2022Abandon2510NoNo
16990525DIALOG SYSTEM WITH AUTOMATIC REACTIVATION OF SPEECH ACQUIRING MODEAugust 2020February 2022Allow1800YesNo
16945525METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATED DETECTION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION USING NEURAL NETWORKSJuly 2020January 2023Allow3020YesNo
16932049DEEP MULTI-CHANNEL ACOUSTIC MODELINGJuly 2020June 2022Allow2310NoNo
16900283CALIBRATED NOISE FOR TEXT MODIFICATIONJune 2020August 2022Allow2610YesNo
16888605SORTING TEXT REPORT CATEGORIESMay 2020October 2020Allow410NoNo
16880567PROCESSING VOICE COMMANDS BASED ON DEVICE TOPOLOGYMay 2020February 2023Abandon3340YesYes
16870396AUDIO ENCODERS, AUDIO DECODERS, METHODS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS ADAPTING AN ENCODING AND DECODING OF LEAST SIGNIFICANT BITSMay 2020March 2022Allow2200YesNo
16870361Audio Encoders, Audio Decoders, Methods and Computer Programs Adapting an Encoding and Decoding of Least Significant BitsMay 2020March 2022Allow2200YesNo
16762074INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND SYSTEM, COMPUTER SYSTEM AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMMay 2020May 2022Allow2410YesNo
16857257Smart Service Method, Apparatus and DeviceApril 2020June 2022Allow2520YesNo
16843872Suggestion of New Entity Types with Discriminative Term Importance AnalysisApril 2020May 2022Allow2510YesNo
16829800ANALYSING SPEECH SIGNALSMarch 2020January 2024Abandon4520NoYes
16822933Information Retrieval According To A User Interest ModelMarch 2020July 2022Abandon2810NoNo
16823036DEVICE AND METHOD FOR GENERATING SYNCHRONOUS CORPUSMarch 2020November 2021Allow2020NoNo
16647284WHISPERING VOICE RECOVERY METHOD, APPARATUS AND DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMMarch 2020July 2022Allow2820NoNo
16791855WORD FLOW ANNOTATIONFebruary 2020April 2022Allow2610YesNo
16790237DISPLAY APPARATUS, VOICE ACQUIRING APPARATUS AND VOICE RECOGNITION METHOD THEREOFFebruary 2020September 2022Allow3120YesNo
16776679Microphone Array Beamforming ControlJanuary 2020April 2022Allow2710YesNo
16749148ENCOURAGING SPEECH SYSTEM, ENCOURAGING SPEECH METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMJanuary 2020March 2022Allow2610YesNo
16632744METHOD AND SYSTEM TO ESTIMATE SPEAKER CHARACTERISTICS ON-THE-FLY FOR UNKNOWN SPEAKER WITH HIGH ACCURACY AND LOW LATENCYJanuary 2020March 2022Allow2510YesNo
16721452METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR HYBRID ENTITY RECOGNITIONDecember 2019October 2022Allow3420YesNo
16709304METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR EVALUATING QUALITY OF ANSWERDecember 2019June 2022Allow3010NoNo
16707262SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SPEECH PERSONALIZATION BY NEEDDecember 2019December 2022Allow3630YesNo
16706705INTERACTIVE REPRESENTATION OF CONTENT FOR RELEVANCE DETECTION AND REVIEWDecember 2019May 2022Abandon2910NoNo
16614241SPEECH RECOGNITION HYPOTHESIS GENERATION ACCORDING TO PREVIOUS OCCURRENCES OF HYPOTHESES TERMS AND/OR CONTEXTUAL DATANovember 2019July 2021Allow2000YesNo
16613502INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUMNovember 2019January 2023Abandon3820YesNo
16671773SENTENCE EMBEDDING METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON SUBWORD EMBEDDING AND SKIP-THOUGHTSNovember 2019May 2022Allow3010YesNo
16664904SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CHATBOT GENERATIONOctober 2019April 2022Allow2910YesNo
16664907System and Method for Dialogue Tree GenerationOctober 2019April 2022Allow3010YesNo
16657270SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING DOCUMENT COMPATIBILITYOctober 2019January 2022Allow2710YesNo
16601940ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROLLING METHOD OF ELECTRONIC DEVICEOctober 2019October 2023Abandon4850NoNo
16593564CROSS-LINGUAL SPEECH RECOGNITIONOctober 2019April 2022Allow3120YesNo
16499816SPEECH SYNTHESIZER USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, METHOD OF OPERATING SPEECH SYNTHESIZER AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUMSeptember 2019April 2022Allow3010YesNo
16583339MULTIMODAL NEURAL NETWORK FOR PUBLIC SPEAKING GUIDANCESeptember 2019February 2024Allow5340NoNo
16573713METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR UPDATING REAL-TIME VOICE RECOGNITION MODEL USING MOVING AGENTSeptember 2019June 2022Allow3310NoNo
16570506PREDICTIVE SIMILARITY SCORING SUBSYSTEM IN A NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING (NLU) FRAMEWORKSeptember 2019June 2022Allow3310YesNo
16570699Systems and Methods for Improved Digital Transcript Creation Using Automated Speech RecognitionSeptember 2019November 2021Abandon2640YesNo
16552712MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TRAINING FOR REVIEWING DOCUMENTSAugust 2019September 2022Allow3630YesNo
16548905COMPATIBLE MULTI-CHANNEL CODING/DECODINGAugust 2019March 2022Allow3010YesNo
16505783SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRANSCRIPT PROCESSINGJuly 2019October 2021Allow2710NoNo
16506295ENCODING METHOD AND APPARATUSJuly 2019November 2021Allow2810NoNo
16419105USING MULTIPLE MODALITY INPUT TO FEEDBACK CONTEXT FOR NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDINGMay 2019October 2021Allow2910YesNo
16401075SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING DOCUMENT COMPATIBILITYMay 2019June 2019Allow200NoNo
16398669RESAMPLING OUTPUT SIGNALS OF QMF BASED AUDIO CODECSApril 2019March 2022Allow3520YesNo
16376076COMPATIBLE MULTI-CHANNEL CODING/DECODINGApril 2019May 2019Allow100YesNo
16376665METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND MEDIA FOR PRESENTING INTERACTIVE AUDIO CONTENTApril 2019February 2022Allow3420NoYes
16376080COMPATIBLE MULTI-CHANNEL CODING/DECODINGApril 2019June 2019Allow200YesNo
16376084COMPATIBLE MULTI-CHANNEL CODING/DECODINGApril 2019May 2019Allow100YesNo
16368331DEEP MULTI-CHANNEL ACOUSTIC MODELING USING MULTIPLE MICROPHONE ARRAY GEOMETRIESMarch 2019July 2022Allow4031NoNo
16362187DETERMINING SEMANTIC SIMILARITY OF TEXTS BASED ON SUB-SECTIONS THEREOFMarch 2019June 2021Allow2720YesNo
16277837MESSAGE AND USER PROFILE INDICATIONS IN SPEECH-BASED SYSTEMSFebruary 2019September 2022Allow4350YesNo
16248995DETECTING EXPRESSIONS LEARNED BASED ON A THEME AND ON WORD CORRELATION AND CO-OCCURENCEJanuary 2019January 2021Allow2410YesNo
16240602LEVERAGING MULTIPLE AUDIO CHANNELS FOR AUTHENTICATIONJanuary 2019January 2020Allow1220YesNo
16233786System and Method for Learning Preferences in Dialogue PersonalizationDecember 2018January 2021Allow2510YesNo
16233829SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DIALOGUE MANAGEMENTDecember 2018January 2021Allow2510YesNo
16216516Multi-Mode Guard for Voice CommandsDecember 2018September 2020Allow2110YesNo
16209332CONTEXT-AWARE QUERY RECOGNITION FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICESDecember 2018May 2021Abandon3020YesNo
16209451COMPATIBLE MULTI-CHANNEL CODING/DECODINGDecember 2018March 2019Allow300YesNo
16208291COMPUTER SYSTEMS EXHIBITING IMPROVED COMPUTER SPEED AND TRANSCRIPTION ACCURACY OF AUTOMATIC SPEECH TRANSCRIPTION (AST) BASED ON A MULTIPLE SPEECH-TO-TEXT ENGINES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFDecember 2018October 2020Allow2310YesNo
16203404AUTOMATED BIAS ELIMINATION IN NEGOTIATED TERMSNovember 2018October 2023Allow5830YesNo
16191907Dynamic Contextual Response FormulationNovember 2018November 2021Abandon3630YesNo
16192245SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACCELERATING USER AGENT CHATSNovember 2018September 2021Allow3430YesNo
16191151INTERACTIVE REPRESENTATION OF CONTENT FOR RELEVANCE DETECTION AND REVIEWNovember 2018March 2022Abandon4040YesNo
16189997SELECTING SPEECH FEATURES FOR BUILDING MODELS FOR DETECTING MEDICAL CONDITIONSNovember 2018September 2020Allow2210NoNo
16157118Estimating Lung Volume by Speech AnalysisOctober 2018July 2020Allow2110YesNo
16156263ANALYSING SPEECH SIGNALSOctober 2018October 2021Allow3640YesNo
16156623DETECTION OF LIVENESSOctober 2018September 2020Allow2310NoNo
16156636MACHINE LEARNING DATA EXTRACTION ALGORITHMSOctober 2018April 2020Allow1900YesNo
16149758AUDIO SIGNAL ENCODING METHOD, APPARATUS AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMOctober 2018June 2020Allow2110NoNo
16143910DEEP MULTI-CHANNEL ACOUSTIC MODELINGSeptember 2018March 2020Allow1800YesNo
16137069DIALOG SYSTEM WITH AUTOMATIC REACTIVATION OF SPEECH ACQUIRING MODESeptember 2018April 2020Allow1910NoNo
16127330ELECTRONIC DEVICE, SERVER AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOFSeptember 2018April 2021Allow3130NoNo
16103295COMPATIBLE MULTI-CHANNEL CODING/DECODINGAugust 2018October 2018Allow200YesNo
16103298COMPATIBLE MULTI-CHANNEL CODING/DECODINGAugust 2018October 2018Allow200YesNo
16102690SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING MEETING INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCESAugust 2018October 2020Allow2610NoNo
16101504CONVOLUTIONAL STATE MODELING FOR PLANNING NATURAL LANGUAGE CONVERSATIONSAugust 2018July 2020Allow2310YesNo
16059951RESOURCE MANAGEMENT USING NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING TAGSAugust 2018July 2020Allow2310NoNo
16058640SYNTHESIZING SPEECH FROM TEXT USING NEURAL NETWORKSAugust 2018December 2020Allow2820YesNo
16075619AUDIO SIGNAL ROUTING TO AUDIO DEVICESAugust 2018August 2020Allow2520YesNo
16053922Method of translating and synthesizing a foreign languageAugust 2018March 2020Allow1900YesNo
16054022CONVERSATION BOUNDARY DETERMINATIONAugust 2018July 2021Allow3540YesNo
16053897METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING SPEECH SYNTHESIS MODELAugust 2018December 2020Allow2820NoNo
16053912METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING SPEECH SYNTHESIS MODELAugust 2018December 2020Allow2920NoNo
16053190METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRAINING OF CONVERSATIONAL AGENTSAugust 2018October 2020Allow2610NoNo
16053718IMPLICIT DIALOG APPROACH FOR CREATING CONVERSATIONAL ACCESS TO WEB CONTENTAugust 2018June 2020Allow2310YesNo
16052930VISUALLY PRESENTING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO A NATURAL LANGUAGE CONVERSATIONAugust 2018August 2022Abandon4821NoNo
16074953TECHNIQUES FOR SPATIALLY SELECTIVE WAKE-UP WORD RECOGNITION AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODSAugust 2018April 2022Allow4550NoNo
16031637SYLLABLE BASED AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITIONJuly 2018October 2020Allow2720YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SHAH, PARAS D.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
12
Examiner Affirmed
10
(83.3%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(16.7%)
Reversal Percentile
28.9%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 16.7% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
22
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(13.6%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
19
(86.4%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
17.1%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 13.6% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner SHAH, PARAS D - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SHAH, PARAS D works in Art Unit 2659 and has examined 382 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 81.4%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 31 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SHAH, PARAS D's allowance rate of 81.4% places them in the 54% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SHAH, PARAS D receive 2.07 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SHAH, PARAS D is 31 months. This places the examiner in the 55% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +33.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SHAH, PARAS D. This interview benefit is in the 81% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 29.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 57% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 31.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 33.3% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 34% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 52.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 23% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 53.8% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 41.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 21% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 28% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.