Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18630772 | OUT-OF-DOMAIN DATA AUGMENTATION FOR NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING | April 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18596327 | SYSTEM, METHOD AND PROGRAMMED PRODUCT FOR UNIQUELY IDENTIFYING PARTICIPANTS IN A RECORDED STREAMING TELECONFERENCE | March 2024 | October 2024 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17820220 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DEVICE CONFIGURED TO GENERATE A MASK VALUE | August 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17842986 | SPEECH SYNTHESIS WITH FOREIGN FRAGMENTS | June 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17662922 | STEP-UP AUTHENTICATION FOR CONVERSATIONAL INTERFACES USING SPOKEN PASSPHRASES | May 2022 | February 2024 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17738541 | CONTEXT SHARING BETWEEN PHYSICAL AND DIGITAL WORLDS | May 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17734471 | PROGRESSIVE CONTRASTIVE LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR SELF-SUPERVISED SPEAKER VERIFICATION | May 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17712301 | RESPONSE DETERMINING DEVICE AND CONTROLLING METHOD OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREFOR | April 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17764291 | NEURAL NETWORK-BASED SIGNAL PROCESSING APPARATUS, NEURAL NETWORK-BASED SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | March 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17651208 | SYSTEM, METHOD AND PROGRAMMED PRODUCT FOR UNIQUELY IDENTIFYING PARTICIPANTS IN A RECORDED STREAMING TELECONFERENCE | February 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17665939 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR NOISE REDUCTION OF FULL-BAND SIGNAL | February 2022 | June 2024 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17647615 | DYNAMICALLY GENERATING DOCUMENTS USING NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING AND DYNAMIC USER INTERFACE | January 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17647499 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR COMPOSITIONAL SPOKEN LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING | January 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17566966 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SPEECH TO TEXT CONVERSION | December 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17644377 | Reducing Streaming ASR Model Delay With Self Alignment | December 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17643684 | Phonemes And Graphemes for Neural Text-to-Speech | December 2021 | February 2024 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17456124 | GENERATION AND DELIVERY OF TEXT-BASED CONTENT USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) BASED TECHNIQUES | November 2021 | December 2023 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17611741 | AUDIO PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTIVE SYSTEM | November 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17517206 | RICH AND INTERACTIVE MECHANISM FOR PROVIDING WORD INFORMATION | November 2021 | June 2024 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17516045 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING VOICE RECOGNITION THEREOF | November 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17452743 | OUT-OF-DOMAIN DATA AUGMENTATION FOR NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING | October 2021 | February 2024 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17452510 | ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING USER INTERFACE ELEMENTS BY VOICE | October 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17508417 | BRIDGING SEMANTICS BETWEEN WORDS AND DEFINITIONS VIA ALIGNING WORD SENSE INVENTORIES | October 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17502933 | PERSONALIZED TEXT PROOFING USING DISTRIBUTED SERVICES | October 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17451033 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RECOGNIZING SPEECH, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | October 2021 | May 2024 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17450778 | ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME | October 2021 | November 2024 | Abandon | 37 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17601866 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD TO CONTROL BEHAVIOR OF AN AGENT | October 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17449878 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PROCESSING USER UTTERANCE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THEREOF | October 2021 | December 2024 | Abandon | 38 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17486910 | EQUIPMENT CONTROL DEVICE AND EQUIPMENT CONTROL METHOD | September 2021 | November 2024 | Abandon | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17462502 | VOICE PROCESSING SYSTEM, METHOD AND RECORDING MEDIUM FOR DISPLAYING VOICE COMMANDS | August 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17462480 | SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD OF DISPLAY APPARATUS UTILIZING VOICE ASSISTANT | August 2021 | September 2024 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17462776 | METHOD OF TRAINING A SPEECH RECOGNITION MODEL OF AN EXTENDED LANGUAGE BY SPEECH IN A SOURCE LANGUAGE | August 2021 | April 2024 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17435002 | GENERATION APPARATUS, GENERATION METHOD AND PROGRAM | August 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17426764 | ENTITY TYPE IDENTIFICATION FOR NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION SYSTEMS | July 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17344341 | DIALOGUE DEVICE, DIALOGUE METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM RECORDING DIALOGUE PROGRAM | June 2021 | March 2024 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17339933 | DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND PRONOUN RESOLUTION NEURAL NETWORK TRAINING METHOD | June 2021 | January 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17322180 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM RECORDING INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM | May 2021 | February 2024 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner CHUNG, DANIEL WONSUK.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner CHUNG, DANIEL WONSUK works in Art Unit 2659 and has examined 35 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 60.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 35 months.
Examiner CHUNG, DANIEL WONSUK's allowance rate of 60.0% places them in the 13% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by CHUNG, DANIEL WONSUK receive 2.11 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 71% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CHUNG, DANIEL WONSUK is 35 months. This places the examiner in the 20% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +50.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by CHUNG, DANIEL WONSUK. This interview benefit is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 30.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 52% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 12.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 19% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 25% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.