Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18582763 | TRANSMIT POWER CHANGE INDICATION | February 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18433967 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVED AMPLITUDE SHIFT KEYING (ASK) COMMUNICATION IN WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER APPLICATIONS | February 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18431677 | CALIBRATION CIRCUIT AND METHOD, PHASE-SHIFT CIRCUIT, RADIO-FREQUENCY TRANSCEIVER CIRCUIT, RADAR AND DEVICE | February 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18428605 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PROCESSING PLURALITY OF PIECES OF INFORMATION, AND OPERATING METHOD THEREFOR | January 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18418844 | DISASSEMBLY AND ASSEMBLY COMPONENT AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE KIT | January 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18572706 | PATHLOSS COMPUTATION FOR POWER CONTROL IN THE PRESENCE OF RECONFIGURABLE INTERACTIVE SURFACES | December 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18531318 | Method and System for Processing an Analog Signal | December 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18290125 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SUPPRESSING CLOSE-IN PHASE NOISE AND RECIPROCAL MIXING NOISE IN SIGNALS | November 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18225170 | RING KICKSTAND | July 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18272924 | MOBILE TERMINAL | July 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18346665 | RF TRANSCEIVER | July 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18210647 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND SOUND RECORDING METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE | June 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18298572 | COMMUNICATION CONTROL APPARATUS AND COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD | April 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18128258 | PHONE SUPPORTS AND METHODS OF ADVERTISING | March 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18191309 | BLUETOOTH CHIP, SIGNAL RECEIVING METHOD, AND BLUETOOTH COMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS | March 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12884518 | TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF INFORMING VEHICLE OPERATORS OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL STATES | September 2010 | March 2013 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner KUNTZ, CURTIS A works in Art Unit 2646 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.
Examiner KUNTZ, CURTIS A's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by KUNTZ, CURTIS A receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KUNTZ, CURTIS A is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 60% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 20% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 27% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.