Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19228495 | IDENTIFICATION OF WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK STATIONS USING RANDOM MEDIUM ACCESS CONTROL ADDRESSING | June 2025 | November 2025 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 19035294 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR COMMUNICATION CHANNEL CONFIGURATION | January 2025 | April 2025 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18949373 | METHODS AND NODE APPARATUS FOR MULTIPLE NODE COMMUNICATION PATHS TO A SERVER WITHIN A WIRELESS NODE NETWORK | November 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18920647 | METHOD AND ACCESS POINT FOR DETERMINING AND PROCESSING A TERMINAL IN A STICKY ROAMING STATE | October 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18598283 | RESOLVING AOA AMBIGUITY BASED ON ROTATION OF USER EQUIPMENT | March 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18567261 | SIM CARD COMMUNICATION CIRCUIT, RELATED APPARATUS, AND CONTROL METHOD | December 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18497753 | HIGH-PRECISION SPATIO-TEMPORAL TRAJECTORY RECOVERY METHOD BASED ON CELL PHONE SIGNALING DATA | October 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18459411 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR STORAGE OF UE POSITIONING CAPABILITIES IN A NETWORK | August 2023 | July 2025 | Abandon | 22 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18276410 | Network Nodes and Methods Therein for Facilitating Registration of Terminal Device | August 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18260648 | Radio Network Node, User Equipment, and Methods Performed Therein | July 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18336948 | Authentication Management Method for Non-3GPP Access of a UE Device to a 5G Network | June 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 18034698 | Method and Apparatus for Locating Terminal, Computer Device, and Storage Medium | April 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18011969 | DETERMINING PROXIMITY | December 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17976857 | Communication Analysis and Correlation System to Identify and Track Digital Personas Through Wireless Communications | October 2022 | August 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17908213 | METHODS FOR SUPPORTING POSITIONING OF A WIRELESS DEVICE AND RELATED NETWORK NODES AND WIRELESS DEVICE | August 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17789056 | METHODS, DEVICES, AND MEDIUM FOR COMMUNICATION | June 2022 | August 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17806870 | TECHNIQUES FOR WAKEUP SIGNALING FOR DISCONTINUOUS RECEPTION GROUPS | June 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17777822 | Method for locating a geo-tag | May 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17703416 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING/RECEIVING SIGNAL IN HALF-DUPLEX SCHEME | March 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14444621 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF AUTOMATIC NEIGHBOR RELATION (ANR) INTELLIGENCE ENHANCEMENT FOR BOOMER NEIGHBOR IN LTE | July 2014 | January 2016 | Abandon | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14341664 | INTERNATIONAL DIALING THROUGH CALL CONNECTIONS | July 2014 | January 2016 | Abandon | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14295487 | REMOTE HATCH POSITION AND CONFIRMATION | June 2014 | November 2015 | Abandon | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14296112 | INTERNATIONAL DIALING THROUGH CALL CONNECTIONS | June 2014 | January 2016 | Abandon | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14228313 | METAL PROTECTOR FRAME ASSEMBLY FOR MOBILE PHONE | March 2014 | September 2015 | Abandon | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14213444 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATING A SECONDARY MOBILE DEVICE | March 2014 | April 2016 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14195304 | PRESSURE-ENABLED NEAR FIELD COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE | March 2014 | January 2016 | Abandon | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14194664 | WIRELESS NETWORK PROMOTIONS | February 2014 | January 2016 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14105453 | PROACTIVE PROVISIONING OF POLICIES BY AN ANDSF SERVER | December 2013 | August 2016 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14097341 | Recommending Preferred Ringer Settings For A Mobile Communications Device | December 2013 | April 2016 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14044345 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF INTERACTING WITH A BROADCASTER VIA AN APPLICATION | October 2013 | April 2016 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13966250 | SHORT MESSAGE SERVICE PROMPTING SYSTEM AND METHOD | August 2013 | August 2015 | Abandon | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13907741 | DEVICE LOCALIZATION USING CAMERA AND WIRELESS SIGNAL | May 2013 | June 2016 | Abandon | 37 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13775067 | METHOD OF DISPLAYING MOBILE TERMINAL IN REMOTE DEVICE AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING THE SAME | February 2013 | July 2015 | Abandon | 29 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13772691 | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, STORAGE MEDIUM AND OUTPUT CONTROLLING METHOD | February 2013 | June 2016 | Abandon | 40 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 13755292 | ADAPTIVE TIMING FOR TRIGGERING GSM TO TD-SCDMA CELL RESELECTION | January 2013 | May 2016 | Abandon | 39 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13696161 | Method and Device for Data Processing in a Wireless Network | January 2013 | January 2016 | Abandon | 38 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 13589714 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING SERVICE AND SERVICE INTERFACE BASED ON POSITION | August 2012 | July 2015 | Abandon | 35 | 6 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11801731 | Transmission method using scalable video coding and mobile communication system using same | May 2007 | December 2015 | Abandon | 60 | 13 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11733605 | Efficient Deployment of Mobile Test Units to Gather Location-Dependent Radio-Frequency Data | April 2007 | November 2015 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 10448481 | Antenna system for adjustable sectorization of a wireless cell | May 2003 | November 2012 | Abandon | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner HU, JINSONG.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner HU, JINSONG works in Art Unit 2643 and has examined 21 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 0.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 29 months.
Examiner HU, JINSONG's allowance rate of 0.0% places them in the 0% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by HU, JINSONG receive 3.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 86% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HU, JINSONG is 29 months. This places the examiner in the 64% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HU, JINSONG. This interview benefit is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 50.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 44% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 33.3% of appeals filed. This is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 100.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 20% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.