Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18738226 | FEEDFORWARD MOTION COMPENSATION FOR FSOC TERMINALS | June 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18633199 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR COMPENSATING PERFORMANCE OF TRANSMITTER IN OPTICAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | April 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18434168 | Phase-Folding Coherent Optical Technology For Optical Communication | February 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18496217 | Data Transmission Method, Apparatus, and System | October 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18380088 | DYNAMIC LANE ASSIGNMENT FOR OPTICAL MODULES IN OPTICAL SUB-SYSTEMS | October 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18213763 | RECEIVER, RECEPTION DEVICE, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | June 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18096992 | POLARITY DEPENDENT OFFSET IN ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERTERS | January 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17918020 | BURST OPTICAL RELAYING DEVICE AND BURST OPTICAL RELAYING METHOD | October 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17871382 | ADD/DROP MULTIPLEXER, NETWORK SYSTEM, TRANSMISSION METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, AND MANAGEMENT DEVICE | July 2022 | December 2023 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17705057 | Providing Access To Client Overhead While Transparently Transmitting The Client Signal Over Multiple Optical Subcarriers | March 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17655817 | COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR TRANSPORT MEANS | March 2022 | December 2023 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14066709 | OPTICAL CONNECTOR | October 2013 | October 2015 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner VANDERPUYE, KENNETH N works in Art Unit 2634 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 24 months.
Examiner VANDERPUYE, KENNETH N's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by VANDERPUYE, KENNETH N receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by VANDERPUYE, KENNETH N is 24 months. This places the examiner in the 82% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 20% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 25% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.