USPTO Examiner WANG HANNAH S - Art Unit 2631

Examiner Information

Name: WANG, HANNAH S
Art Unit: 2631
Total Cases: 1
Last Active: July 2024

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18777291METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ROBUST MIMO TRANSMISSIONJuly 2024October 2025Allow1500NoNo
18657292APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR LOW LATENCY OFF-GRID PEER-TO-PEER TRACKING AND MESSAGINGMay 2024December 2025Abandon2010NoNo
18705076Receiver for and method of receiving symbols over time varying channels with Doppler spreadApril 2024January 2026Allow2120NoNo
18477820SIGNAL TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUSSeptember 2023November 2025Allow2610NoNo
18470830SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DRIVING THE SAMESeptember 2023November 2025Allow2610YesNo
18454507APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MONITORING DUTY CYCLE OF MEMORY CLOCK SIGNALAugust 2023August 2025Allow2310YesNo
17882385EXCESS BITRATE DISTRIBUTION BASED ON QUALITY GAIN IN SABR SERVERAugust 2022March 2023Allow800YesNo
17870923BUSINESS CARD INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMJuly 2022February 2026Abandon4320NoNo
16910576CACHE DECISION METHOD AND APPARATUSJune 2020February 2023Allow3100YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner WANG, HANNAH S - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner WANG, HANNAH S works in Art Unit 2631 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 31 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner WANG, HANNAH S's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by WANG, HANNAH S receive 0.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WANG, HANNAH S is 31 months. This places the examiner in the 55% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 20% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 25% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.