Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10199013 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MEASURING SIR IN CDMA COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | July 2002 | March 2006 | Allow | 44 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 10165391 | METHOD OF ADJUSTING WEIGHTS OF AN EQUALIZER | June 2002 | January 2006 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10162938 | RADIOFREQUENCY SIGNAL RECEIVER WITH MEANS FOR CORRECTING THE EFFECTS OF MULTIPATH SIGNALS, AND METHOD FOR ACTIVATING THE RECEIVER | June 2002 | March 2006 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10063621 | DIFFERENTIAL CLOCK SIGNALS ENCODED WITH DATA | May 2002 | November 2005 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10106437 | PHASE DETECTOR CUSTOMIZED FOR CLOCK SYNTHESIS UNIT | March 2002 | March 2006 | Allow | 47 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10084580 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ADAPTIVE EQUALIZATION | February 2002 | November 2005 | Allow | 44 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10086084 | METHOD FOR SELECTING SYNC MARKS AND SYNC MARK DETECTORS | February 2002 | October 2005 | Allow | 44 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10061102 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING NYQUIST FOLDING FREQUENCY MODULATION | February 2002 | February 2006 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10057751 | EFFICIENT FFT IMPLEMENTATION FOR ASYMMETRIC DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (ADSL) | January 2002 | August 2005 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10029842 | RECOVERING DATA ENCODED IN SERIAL COMMUNICATION CHANNELS | December 2001 | December 2005 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10033505 | PARALLEL SIGNAL TRANSMISSION DEVICE | December 2001 | May 2005 | Allow | 41 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 10017591 | ADAPTIVE EQUALIZATION METHOD AND ADAPTIVE EQUALIZER | December 2001 | September 2005 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 09979587 | Gain control device | November 2001 | September 2005 | Abandon | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 09991439 | DIGITAL VSB TRANSMISSION SYSTEM | November 2001 | February 2006 | Allow | 51 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 09991442 | DIGITAL VSB TRANSMISSION SYSTEM | November 2001 | August 2005 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 09959534 | ADAPTIVE EQUALIZER AND ADAPTIVE EQUALIZING METHOD | October 2001 | October 2005 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 09967548 | IN-BAND ADJACENT-CHANNEL DIGITAL AUDIO BROADCASTING SYSTEM | September 2001 | January 2006 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 09952191 | DATA DECISION CIRCUIT USING CLOCK SIGNAL WHICH HAS PHASE OPTIMIZED WITH RESPECT TO PHASE OF INPUT DATA SIGNAL | September 2001 | February 2006 | Allow | 53 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 09926039 | METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING DATA FROM AN INTERROGATING DEVICE TO PORTABLE OBJECTS | August 2001 | June 2005 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 09917837 | CDMA MULTI-USER DETECTION WITH A REAL SYMBOL CONSTELLATION | July 2001 | November 2005 | Allow | 52 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 09915382 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SYNCHRONIZATION | July 2001 | June 2005 | Allow | 47 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 09814709 | MODEM APPARATUS, IMAGE COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD | March 2001 | May 2005 | Allow | 49 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner AGHDAM, FRESHTEH N works in Art Unit 2631 and has examined 22 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 95.5%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 46 months.
Examiner AGHDAM, FRESHTEH N's allowance rate of 95.5% places them in the 84% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by AGHDAM, FRESHTEH N receive 1.18 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 12% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by AGHDAM, FRESHTEH N is 46 months. This places the examiner in the 12% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +4.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by AGHDAM, FRESHTEH N. This interview benefit is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 22.7% of allowed cases (in the 98% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 19.0% of allowed cases (in the 94% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.