Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18961563 | TOUCH SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE | November 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18820741 | Dynamic Display Timing Controller for Radio Frequency Interference Mitigation | August 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 17 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18741174 | Translating Interactions on a Two-Dimensional Interface to an Artificial Reality Experience | June 2024 | March 2026 | Abandon | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18642798 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE | April 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18586820 | SCAN SIGNAL DRIVER CIRCUIT, DISPLAY PANEL, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND DRIVING METHOD | February 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15895660 | FILTERING STYLUS STROKES | February 2018 | March 2018 | Allow | 1 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15563235 | DISTINGUISHING NON-INPUT CONTACT | September 2017 | June 2020 | Allow | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15673693 | OPERATION METHOD OF DISPLAY DEVICE | August 2017 | January 2020 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15604352 | ZERO-DIMENSIONAL BASELINE MANAGEMENT | May 2017 | September 2019 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15355353 | HANDHELD INTERFACE DEVICE HAVING A PLURALITY OF ELECTROSTATIC FRICTION (ESF) ELECTRODES | November 2016 | September 2019 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 15054674 | DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD | February 2016 | May 2019 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14924917 | PROJECTION SYSTEM WITH ADDITIONAL SERIES CONNECTED LIGHT VALVE FOR ENHANCED CONTRAST | October 2015 | May 2017 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14919434 | ELECTRO-OPTICAL DEVICE, METHOD OF CONTROLLING ELECTRO-OPTICAL DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENT | October 2015 | June 2018 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14707414 | Display Correction Circuit, Display Correction System, and Display Device | May 2015 | August 2019 | Allow | 52 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 14440902 | LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE | May 2015 | June 2017 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14570727 | FILTERING STYLUS STROKES | December 2014 | October 2017 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 14272882 | Active Stylus with Force Sensor | May 2014 | March 2016 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14117959 | SCANNING SIGNAL LINE DRIVE CIRCUIT, DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING THE SAME, AND DRIVING METHOD FOR SCANNING SIGNAL LINE | November 2013 | March 2016 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14117671 | LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE, METHOD OF DRIVING LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE, AND TELEVISION RECEIVER | November 2013 | July 2016 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13971063 | MEANS FOR DYNAMICALLY REGULATING THE TIME-OUT CHARACTERISTICS OF A DISPLAY OF AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE | August 2013 | December 2015 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13744550 | LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY WITH PHOTO-LUMINESCENT MATERIAL LAYER | January 2013 | March 2016 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13745260 | MOBILE TERMINAL AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME | January 2013 | September 2015 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13658642 | ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DISPLAY AND METHOD OF DRIVING THEREOF | October 2012 | June 2015 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13483666 | DISPLAY DEVICE AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF | May 2012 | July 2015 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13378233 | DISPLAY DRIVING CIRCUIT, DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE | December 2011 | October 2014 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 13378360 | COLOR SPACE MATCHING OF VIDEO SIGNALS | December 2011 | August 2014 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13378270 | LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF | December 2011 | October 2014 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13047292 | APPARATUS AND A METHOD FOR GESTURE RECOGNITION | March 2011 | July 2015 | Allow | 52 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 13023995 | DISPLAY CONTROL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING DISPLAY ON TOUCH PANEL, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | February 2011 | December 2013 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 13024241 | METHOD FOR ASSISTING USER INPUT TO A DEVICE | February 2011 | September 2013 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13024039 | LIQUID CRYSTAL PANEL DRIVING METHOD, AND SOURCE DRIVER AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY APPARATUS USING THE METHOD | February 2011 | June 2014 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 12682620 | BACKLIGHT AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY UNIT USING SAME | April 2010 | February 2014 | Allow | 46 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 12682235 | Interactive Display System With Collaborative Gesture Detection | April 2010 | December 2015 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 12682089 | CAPACITY LOAD DRIVE DEVICE AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE USING THE SAME | April 2010 | September 2014 | Allow | 53 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 12669100 | PLASMA DISPLAY PANEL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME | January 2010 | September 2012 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12687401 | INPUT APPARATUS, CONTROL APPARATUS, CONTROL SYSTEM, AND CONTROL METHOD | January 2010 | August 2013 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12686690 | POLARIZER CAPACITIVE TOUCH SCREEN | January 2010 | September 2012 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12686885 | PIXEL AND ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DISPLAY DEVICE USING THE SAME | January 2010 | July 2013 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12495984 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | July 2009 | January 2014 | Allow | 55 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 12495217 | METHOD FOR OPERATING MOUSE WHEEL ACCORDING TO POSITION OF CURSOR POINTER | June 2009 | May 2012 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12495011 | Optical Touch Panel Having SMT Components As Optical Gates | June 2009 | September 2013 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12494791 | DISPLAY UNIT WITH LUMINANCE AND CHROMATICITY CORRECTION USING COMPRESSED CORRECTION MATRIX | June 2009 | November 2013 | Allow | 53 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 12427433 | SENSING CIRCUIT, DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS | April 2009 | March 2014 | Allow | 59 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12309671 | DISPLAY CONTROLLER, DISPLAY DEVICE, DISPLAY SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING DISPLAY DEVICE | January 2009 | November 2013 | Allow | 58 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12260827 | DISPLAY DEVICE, DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | October 2008 | August 2011 | Allow | 33 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12260294 | PLSMA DISPLAY APPARATUS | October 2008 | March 2012 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12260141 | Automatic Color Adjustment Method and An Automatic Color Adjustment Device | October 2008 | January 2012 | Abandon | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12260103 | ELECTROLUMINESCENT DISPLAY WITH EFFICIENCY COMPENSATION | October 2008 | May 2012 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12260656 | Display Device Provided With Optical Input Function | October 2008 | July 2012 | Abandon | 45 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12083778 | Plasma Display Panel and Plasma Display Device | October 2008 | January 2012 | Abandon | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12084410 | Virtual Interface System | September 2008 | April 2012 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12188577 | DISPLAY APPARATUS, PIXEL STRUCTURE AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF | August 2008 | March 2012 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12188221 | DATA ACCESS METHOD FOR A TIMING CONTROLLER OF A FLAT PANEL DISPLAY AND RELATED DEVICE | August 2008 | June 2012 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12188237 | GRAPHIC USER INTERFACE DEVICE AND METHOD OF DISPLAYING GRAPHIC OBJECTS | August 2008 | March 2016 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 12187490 | PLASMA DISPLAY PANEL | August 2008 | January 2012 | Abandon | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12187774 | MATRIX ARRAY DRIVE DEVICE, DISPLAY AND IMAGE SENSOR | August 2008 | February 2012 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12187885 | Wireless Mouse with Companion Wireless Mouse Pad | August 2008 | November 2011 | Abandon | 40 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 12083479 | High Efficiency Display Utilizing Simultaneous Color Intelligent Backlighting and Luminescence Controlling Shutters | April 2008 | March 2012 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12083452 | Light Valve Display Using Low Resolution Programmable Color Backlighting | April 2008 | March 2012 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12083441 | Light Valve Display Using Low Resolution Programmable Color Backlighting | April 2008 | January 2012 | Abandon | 45 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12083444 | Display Utilizing Simultaneous Color Intelligent Backlighting and luminescence Controlling Shutters | April 2008 | February 2012 | Abandon | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12083449 | High Efficiency Display Utilizing Simultaneous Color Intelligent Backlighting and Luminescence Controllling Shutters | April 2008 | March 2012 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10547250 | METHOD OF CONTROLLING AN ELECTROCHROMIC MATRIX DISPLAY AND ELECTROCHROMIC DISPLAY | September 2006 | July 2008 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11464237 | SYSTEM FOR DISPLAYING IMAGES | August 2006 | June 2007 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10547335 | Data input device, data input method, data input program, and computer-readable recording medium containing data input program | September 2005 | September 2008 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10546048 | Guard-equipped image display device | August 2005 | April 2008 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10545062 | Electrophoretic display panel | August 2005 | February 2008 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11034886 | Keyboard and key seal | January 2005 | May 2008 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11035052 | Display apparatus and display system | January 2005 | May 2008 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11035181 | Viewing screen color limiting device and method | January 2005 | April 2008 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10968993 | Image display apparatus | October 2004 | March 2008 | Abandon | 41 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10931350 | Image displaying apparatus | September 2004 | October 2007 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10931312 | FUZZY LOGIC BASED LCD OVERDRIVE CONTROL METHOD | August 2004 | October 2007 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10823223 | Horizontal scrolling mouse | April 2004 | December 2007 | Abandon | 44 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10819274 | DRIVING CIRCUIT FOR COLOR IMAGE DISPLAY AND DISPLAY DEVICE PROVIDED WITH THE SAME | April 2004 | January 2008 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 10810621 | METHOD FOR LUMINANCE COMPENSATION OF LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY AND ITS DEVICE | March 2004 | September 2007 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10809800 | Display processor | March 2004 | December 2007 | Abandon | 44 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10810078 | Circuit element, signal processing circuit, control device, display device, method of driving display device, method of driving circuit element, and method of driving control device | March 2004 | August 2008 | Abandon | 53 | 1 | 2 | No | No |
| 10808369 | Multiline addressing drive method and apparatus for passive matrix liquid crystal, and a liquid crystal panel | March 2004 | November 2007 | Abandon | 44 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10763429 | Membrane antenna assembly for a wireless device | January 2004 | December 2007 | Abandon | 47 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10756756 | Current source circuit, a signal line driver circuit and a driving method thereof and a light emitting device | January 2004 | October 2013 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 2 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner NADKARNI, SARVESH J.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner NADKARNI, SARVESH J works in Art Unit 2629 and has examined 76 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 63.2%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.
Examiner NADKARNI, SARVESH J's allowance rate of 63.2% places them in the 23% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by NADKARNI, SARVESH J receive 1.86 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 43% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by NADKARNI, SARVESH J is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 24% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +21.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by NADKARNI, SARVESH J. This interview benefit is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 29.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 55% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 27.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 39% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 200.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 95% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 75.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 64% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 66.7% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 200.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 1.3% of allowed cases (in the 70% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 25% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.