USPTO Examiner ARONOVICH OLGA - Art Unit 2629

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19215026DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE DISPLAY DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEMay 2025March 2026Allow1000NoNo
19028529DISPLAY DATA GENERATION DEVICE, DISPLAY DATA GENERATION METHOD, AND DISPLAY DATA GENERATION PROGRAMJanuary 2025February 2026Allow1310NoNo
18687043SCREEN BRIGHTNESS ADJUSTMENT METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMJanuary 2025December 2025Allow2210NoNo
18966114Transparent Touch Display ApparatusDecember 2024February 2026Allow1410NoNo
18908377DISPLAY DEVICEOctober 2024March 2026Allow1710NoNo
18906796BIOFEEDBACK METHOD OF MODULATING DIGITAL CONTENT TO INVOKE GREATER PUPIL RADIUS RESPONSEOctober 2024March 2026Allow1710YesNo
18898288ELECTRONIC DEVICESeptember 2024December 2025Allow1500NoNo
18890622Wearable Electronic Devices, Extended Reality Systems Including Neuromuscular Sensors, and Methods for Generating Text from Speech Input and Modifying the Generated Text Based on Neuromuscular DataSeptember 2024June 2025Allow900YesNo
18825989METHOD OF TRANSMITTING TRANSMISSION DATA FROM SENSOR CONTROLLER TO PEN, AND PENSeptember 2024November 2025Allow1410NoNo
18840496DISPLAY CONTROL SYSTEM, DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAMAugust 2024October 2025Allow1410YesNo
18780662HYBRID PULSE-WIDTH-MODULATION PIXELSJuly 2024December 2025Allow1710NoNo
18766934OPTICAL APPARATUS CAPABLE OF ADJUSTING A LIGHT AMOUNT IN EACH OF A PLURALITY OF OPTICAL SYSTEMS WITH A SIMPLE STRUCTUREJuly 2024March 2026Allow2020NoNo
18616660SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUSES FOR PROVIDING A VERSATILE MEMS-BASED DISPLAYMarch 2024December 2025Allow2020NoNo
18576119TILING PANEL, SELF-LUMINOUS PANEL, AND MANUFACTURING METHODJanuary 2024February 2025Allow1420YesNo
18574598INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING TERMINAL, AND EXPECTED-OPERATION RECOGNITION METHODDecember 2023January 2026Allow2510NoNo
18333141ELECTRICAL DEVICEJune 2023March 2026Allow3310YesNo
17954248TOUCH INPUT DEVICESSeptember 2022November 2025Allow3820NoYes
15191614DYNAMIC ADJUSTMENT OF DEMODULATION WAVEFORMJune 2016September 2018Allow2720YesNo
15025672TOUCH SCREEN AND DRIVE METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY DEVICEMarch 2016June 2018Allow2620NoNo
15042042MOBILE TERMINAL WITH DUAL TOUCH SENSORS LOCATED ON DIFFERENT SIDES OF TERMINAL BODY AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAMEFebruary 2016January 2017Allow1110YesNo
15040207EVALUATION OF DIGITAL CONTENT USING INTENTIONAL USER FEEDBACK OBTAINED THROUGH HAPTIC INTERFACEFebruary 2016September 2018Allow3110YesNo
14940484INPUT OPERATION DETECTION DEVICE, PROJECTION APPARATUS, INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARD, DIGITAL SIGNAGE, AND PROJECTION SYSTEMNovember 2015April 2018Allow2920NoNo
14937541TIMING CONTROL UNIT AND APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DISPLAYING USING THE SAMENovember 2015July 2016Allow910NoNo
14922431APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING OPERATION OF MOBILE TERMINALOctober 2015March 2017Allow1720NoNo
14772050HEADS UP DISPLAY FOR A VEHICLE INTERIORSeptember 2015July 2018Allow3420NoNo
14815771TACTILE INTERFACE FOR A COMPUTING DEVICEJuly 2015October 2016Allow1500NoNo
14810743TOUCH SENSOR SHEET, TOUCH DISPLAY PANEL, AND DISPLAY APPARATUSJuly 2015October 2018Allow3930YesNo
14562039DISPLAY DEVICE, MOBILE TERMINAL AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAMEDecember 2014November 2016Allow2320NoNo
14504331DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DRIVING THE SAMEOctober 2014October 2015Allow1300NoNo
14095900DISPLAY APPRATUSDecember 2013October 2015Allow2310NoNo
14088761NOISE COMPENSATING TOUCH PANEL AND TOUCH DEVICE THEREOFNovember 2013September 2015Allow2110NoNo
14089201COLOR CALIBRATION APPARATUS AND METHOD USABLE WITH DISPLAY DEVICENovember 2013March 2016Allow2720YesNo
13943671SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A TOUCH INPUT INTERFACE FOR INFORMATION COMPUTING AND CONTROL DEVICESJuly 2013August 2014Allow1310NoNo
13850577MORE USEFUL MAN MACHINE INTERFACES AND APPLICATIONSMarch 2013December 2013Allow910YesNo
13579355LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICEAugust 2012July 2013Allow1110YesNo
13522618DISPLAY DEVICEJuly 2012June 2014Allow2300NoNo
13478842ELECTROMAGNETIC RESONANCE SENSING APPARATUS FOR A TOUCH SCREENMay 2012September 2014Allow2810NoNo
13477680Method and Apparatus for Display CalibrationMay 2012July 2014Allow2610YesNo
13265748INPUT APPARATUSOctober 2011June 2014Allow3240YesYes
13246702Pencil Eraser Gesture and Gesture Recognition Method for Touch-Enabled User InterfacesSeptember 2011May 2013Allow2020YesNo
13164849THREE-DIMENSIONAL DISPLAY SYSTEM, DISPLAY AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING BACKLIGHT OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL DISPLAYJune 2011February 2015Allow4420YesNo
12832984LCD BACKLIGHT DRIVING DEVICE WITH AN ISOLATING TRANSFORMERJuly 2010November 2012Allow2810NoNo
12759382OLED Display System Compensating for Changes ThereinApril 2010October 2012Abandon3010NoNo
12719021Light guide module, optical touch module, and method of increasing a signal to noise ratio of an optical touch moduleMarch 2010June 2014Allow5121YesNo
12712955METHOD OF CALIBRATING POSITION OFFSET OF CURSORFebruary 2010May 2013Allow3800NoNo
12712750POWER SUPPLY AND DISPLAY APPARATUS HAVING THE SAMEFebruary 2010December 2014Allow5721NoNo
12711295TOUCH SENSITIVE INPUT DEVICEFebruary 2010September 2012Abandon3010NoNo
12711254TOUCH PANEL AND TOUCH DISPLAY PANELFebruary 2010June 2013Allow3910NoNo
12683615METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR POWER CONTROL EVENT RESPONSIVE DISPLAY DEVICESJanuary 2010July 2014Allow5540NoYes
12572944CAPACITIVE MATRIX TOUCH SENSOROctober 2009April 2014Allow5530YesNo
12572343DISPLAY DEVICEOctober 2009April 2015Allow6040YesNo
12559590ELECTROPHORETIC DISPLAY DEVICE, ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, AND METHOD FOR DRIVING ELECTROPHORETIC DISPLAY DEVICESeptember 2009February 2012Abandon2910NoNo
12506061MOUSE STRUCTURE WITH MUSIC EDITING FUNCTIONJuly 2009June 2012Abandon3510NoNo
12505549ELECTRO-OPTICAL APPARATUS AND DISPLAY THEREOFJuly 2009July 2012Allow3610YesNo
12505521FLEXIBLE DISPLAY PANELJuly 2009April 2012Allow3310YesNo
12505476Optical touch display device, optical touch sensing device and touch sensing methodJuly 2009July 2012Abandon3610NoNo
12523624IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS, DISPLAY METHOD THEREOF, PROGRAM, INTEGRATED CIRCUIT, GOGGLE-TYPE HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAY, VEHICLE, BINOCULARS, AND DESKTOP DISPLAYJuly 2009June 2012Allow3500YesNo
12505285INPUT DISPLAY DEVICE, ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUMJuly 2009March 2013Allow4420NoNo
12331852DRIVING METHOD OF ELECTROPHORETIC DISPLAY DEVICE, ELECTROPHORETIC DISPLAY DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSDecember 2008May 2014Allow6020NoNo
12295802METHOD OF DRIVING PLASMA DISPLAY PANEL, AND PLASMA DISPLAY DEVICEOctober 2008December 2010Allow2710NoNo
12076808DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSMarch 2008November 2011Allow4410NoNo
12076785DISPLAY APPARATUS AND DRIVING METHOD WITH FIRST AND SECOND TIME CORRECTION OF PIXEL DRIVE TRANSISTORMarch 2008July 2012Allow5210NoNo
12077788Laminated and tilled displays and methods of manufacturing the sameMarch 2008October 2012Abandon5410NoNo
12076572Display apparatus of adjusting gamma and brightness based on ambient light and its display adjustment methodMarch 2008February 2012Abandon4710NoNo
12077518LCD DRIVING METHOD USING SELF-MASKING, AND MASKING CIRCUIT AND ASYMMETRIC LATCHES THEREOFMarch 2008June 2012Allow5110NoNo
12076473DISPLAY APPARATUS, DISPLAY-APPARATUS DRIVING METHOD AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENTMarch 2008May 2012Allow4910YesNo
12067449REFINED COORDINATE DETECTION METHOD AND ERROR CORRECTION METHOD FOR TOUCH PANELMarch 2008April 2011Allow3700NoNo
12077479Liquid crystal panel and method for driving sameMarch 2008October 2012Abandon5420NoNo
12067328Color Overdrive for Color Sequential Matrix-Type Display DevicesMarch 2008February 2012Abandon4710NoNo
12077385Liquid crystal display and driving method thereofMarch 2008October 2012Abandon5420NoNo
12067386INPUT DEVICE AND MOBILE TERMINAL HAVING THE SAMEMarch 2008November 2011Abandon4410NoNo
12076553Pointing apparatus, pointer control apparatus, pointing method, and pointer control methodMarch 2008January 2013Allow5840YesNo
12067304DISPLAY DEVICEMarch 2008November 2015Allow6020NoYes
12077299HEAD WORN HEAD UP DISPLAY SYSTEMMarch 2008January 2011Allow3400NoNo
12077090DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MAKING THE SAMEMarch 2008September 2011Allow4200NoNo
12077039ELECTROPHORETIC DISPLAY DEVICE, METHOD OF DRIVING ELECTROPHORETIC DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSMarch 2008May 2012Allow5020YesNo
12073929DISPLAY APPARATUS AND DRIVING METHOD THEREFOR, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEMarch 2008June 2011Allow3900NoNo
12074934Electronic device for selecting an application based on sensed orientation and methods for use therewithMarch 2008November 2011Abandon4410NoNo
11922758LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE AND ITS DRIVE METHODDecember 2007September 2011Allow4510NoNo
11922756DISPLAY DEVICE, ITS DRIVE CIRCUIT, AND DRIVE METHODDecember 2007August 2012Allow5620NoYes
11919807Isotonic/elastic hybrid input deviceNovember 2007November 2011Abandon4810NoNo
11931876PLASMA DISPLAY PANEL AND PLASMA DISPLAY APPARATUSOctober 2007June 2011Allow4310YesNo
11933235ELECTROPHORETIC DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAMEOctober 2007August 2011Abandon4510NoNo
11932731DIGITAL, DATA, AND MULTIMEDIA USER INTERFACE WITH A KEYBOARDOctober 2007March 2012Allow5320YesNo
11931200PLASMA DISPLAY PANEL AND PLASMA DISPLAY APPARATUSOctober 2007December 2011Abandon5020NoNo
11931735PLASMA DISPLAY PANELOctober 2007August 2012Allow5720YesNo
11927302REGULATION OF WAVELENGTH SHIFT AND PERCEIVED COLOR OF SOLID STATE LIGHTING WITH INTENSITY AND TEMPERATURE VARIATIONOctober 2007March 2012Allow5311YesNo
11927291INSPECTION DEVICE AND INSPECTION METHOD FOR ACTIVE MATRIX PANEL, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR ACTIVE MATRIX ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE PANELOctober 2007March 2012Allow5230NoNo
11817844LIGHT BLOCKING DISPLAY DEVICE OF ELECTRIC FIELD DRIVING TYPESeptember 2007June 2012Allow5740YesNo
11816211FLAT DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAMESeptember 2007August 2011Allow4920NoNo
11817153Input Device, Input Method, Corresponding Computer Program, and Corresponding Computer-Readable Storage MediumAugust 2007July 2013Allow6020YesNo
11817108PORTABLE TERMINALAugust 2007April 2012Allow5630YesNo
11817037ACTIVE MATRIX ARRAY DEVICEAugust 2007April 2012Allow5640YesNo
11817034METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRACKING SWEET SPOTSAugust 2007July 2013Allow6020NoNo
11816283DEVICE CAPABLE OF BEING OPERATED WITHIN A NETWORK, NETWORK SYSTEM, METHOD OF OPERATING A DEVICE WITHIN A NETWORK, PROGRAM ELEMENT, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUMAugust 2007May 2012Allow5720NoNo
11816033POINTER LIGHT TRACKING METHOD, PROGRAM, AND RECORDING MEDIUM THEREOFAugust 2007July 2011Allow4821NoNo
11816057Display Device and Method, Key, Keyboard and Electronic Device Using SameAugust 2007October 2011Abandon5020NoNo
11816030METHOD FOR DRIVING PLASMA DISPLAY PANEL AND PLASMA DISPLAY DEVICEAugust 2007August 2012Allow6020YesNo
11815899METHOD OF DRIVING PLASMA DISPLAY PANEL, AND PLASMA DISPLAY DEVICEAugust 2007April 2011Allow4520YesNo
11815306METHOD FOR DRIVING LIGHT-EMITTING PANELAugust 2007March 2012Allow5520NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner ARONOVICH, OLGA.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
1
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
8.5%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
9
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(33.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
6
(66.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
52.7%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner ARONOVICH, OLGA - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner ARONOVICH, OLGA works in Art Unit 2629 and has examined 146 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 69.9%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 45 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner ARONOVICH, OLGA's allowance rate of 69.9% places them in the 32% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by ARONOVICH, OLGA receive 1.82 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 41% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ARONOVICH, OLGA is 45 months. This places the examiner in the 12% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +35.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ARONOVICH, OLGA. This interview benefit is in the 83% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 38.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 32.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 48% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 80.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 63% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 88.9% of appeals filed. This is in the 82% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 87.5% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 50.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 4.8% of allowed cases (in the 85% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.0% of allowed cases (in the 68% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.