Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19260077 | TECHNIQUES FOR OPTIMIZING A DISPLAY LOCATION FOR DISPLAYING AUGMENTED-REALITY (AR) CONTENT USING AR GLASSES, AND DEVICES AND METHODS OF USING SUCH TECHNIQUES | July 2025 | March 2026 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 19206916 | CHOLESTERIC LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE WITH TIMING CONTROLLING SOFTWARE | May 2025 | February 2026 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 19203548 | GATE DRIVER, DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE GATE DRIVER, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE GATE DRIVER | May 2025 | January 2026 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 19198241 | DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME | May 2025 | January 2026 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18986230 | LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DRIVING THE SAME | December 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18902211 | DISPLAY SUBSTRATE, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS | September 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18822260 | SENSING DEVICES AND GLOVES FOR CAPTURING HAND ACTIONS | September 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18732137 | DISPLAY DEVICE, METHOD OF GENERATING COMPENSATION DATA FOR DISPLAY DEVICE, AND DEVICE FOR GENERATING COMPENSATION DATA | June 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18669799 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SETTING BIAS VOLTAGE | May 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18633435 | DISPLAY DEVICE | April 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 16976967 | DISPLAY SYSTEM FOR RENDERING A SCENE WITH MULTIPLE FOCAL PLANES | August 2020 | November 2025 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16793005 | REAL-TIME VISUAL PLAYBACKS | February 2020 | May 2021 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16721258 | DETECTION OF NON-TOUCH INPUTS USING A SIGNATURE | December 2019 | March 2021 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16416135 | METHOD FOR PREVENTING AN EDGE FROM BEING UNINTENTIONALLY TOUCHED, TOUCH CONTROL APPARATUS AND STORAGE MEDIUM | May 2019 | May 2021 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16389133 | Apparatus, Method And System For Location Based Touch | April 2019 | June 2020 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16320059 | DISPLAY DEVICE AND ADJUSTMENT METHOD | January 2019 | February 2021 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16301529 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL DISPLAY | November 2018 | January 2020 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16176387 | DISPLAY DEVICE AND LIGHT SOURCE | October 2018 | May 2020 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16023427 | AUGMENTED REALITY SPEED READING | June 2018 | March 2020 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15980727 | ON-BOARD HEAD UP DISPLAY | May 2018 | December 2019 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15809001 | SELF-REFRESH DISPLAY DRIVING DEVICE, DRIVING METHOD AND DISPLAY DEVICE | November 2017 | September 2019 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15206879 | APPARATUS, METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LOCATION BASED TOUCH | July 2016 | January 2019 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15206629 | PANEL DISPLAY DRIVING CIRCUIT AND TOUCH TIME ARRANGING METHOD | July 2016 | February 2018 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15174174 | MULTI-FUNCTIONAL ACTIVE MATRIX ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY | June 2016 | July 2017 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14439358 | MOBILE TERMINAL AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | April 2015 | June 2019 | Allow | 49 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14429981 | PIXEL ARRAY AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF, DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE | March 2015 | August 2017 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14430016 | LEVEL SHIFT CIRCUIT, GATE DRIVING CIRCUIT AND DISPLAY APPARATUS | March 2015 | January 2017 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14575826 | USER INTERFACE SYSTEM AND METHOD | December 2014 | November 2016 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14453136 | AUTOMATIC CORRECTION FUNCTION DETERMINING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, AND AUTOMATIC CORRECTION FUNCTION DETERMINING METHOD | August 2014 | February 2016 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14451710 | HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY | August 2014 | June 2017 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14270072 | IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | May 2014 | August 2017 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14269971 | TOUCH SENSING DEVICE AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF | May 2014 | April 2017 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14201591 | DISPLAY PANEL DRIVER AND DISPLAY DEVICE | March 2014 | November 2016 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 14094153 | METHOD OF DIMMING BACKLIGHT ASSEMBLY | December 2013 | April 2015 | Allow | 16 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13968228 | DISPLAY/TOUCH TEMPORAL SEPARATION | August 2013 | May 2017 | Allow | 45 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13967009 | PORTABLE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME | August 2013 | March 2016 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13966967 | OBJECT TRACKING FOR DEVICE INPUT | August 2013 | May 2017 | Allow | 45 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13727730 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | December 2012 | March 2016 | Allow | 39 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13700826 | ADJUSTING THE COLOR OUTPUT OF A DISPLAY DEVICE BASED ON A COLOR PROFILE | November 2012 | August 2015 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13700770 | STEREOSCOPIC IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS HAVING FILM-TYPE PATTERNED RETARDER | November 2012 | August 2015 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 13462934 | TRANSPARENT DISPLAY APPARATUS | May 2012 | March 2015 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 13419754 | ORGANIC EL DISPLAY DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | March 2012 | April 2014 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13420147 | DISPLAY DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR | March 2012 | June 2013 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13278138 | User Interface System and Method | October 2011 | August 2014 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13091599 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, DISPLAY DEVICE, DISPLAY SYSTEM, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING DISPLAY DEVICE | April 2011 | December 2014 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 12969809 | METHOD OF DIMMING BACKLIGHT ASSEMBLY | December 2010 | July 2013 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12883332 | METHOD FOR ANALYZING LIGHT PROFILE OF LIGHT SOURCE AND DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DRIVING LOCAL DIMMING OF LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE BY USING THE SAME | September 2010 | October 2013 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner FIGUEROA-GIBSON, GLORYVID works in Art Unit 2628 and has examined 37 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 29 months.
Examiner FIGUEROA-GIBSON, GLORYVID's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by FIGUEROA-GIBSON, GLORYVID receive 2.05 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 54% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by FIGUEROA-GIBSON, GLORYVID is 29 months. This places the examiner in the 64% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by FIGUEROA-GIBSON, GLORYVID. This interview benefit is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 42.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 40.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 61% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 19% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 25% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.