Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19050483 | INTERLACED ROW DRIVING ARRAY SUBSTRATE, DISPLAY PANEL, AND DISPLAY DEVICE | February 2025 | November 2025 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18978711 | DUAL-MEMORY DRIVING OF AN ELECTRONIC DISPLAY | December 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18873288 | EXTENDED REALITY (XR) SYSTEM WITH BODY-CENTRIC POSE ESTIMATION USING ALTIMETER RELATIVE ELEVATION | December 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18591422 | DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS | February 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18589620 | DISPLAY DEVICE, A METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME, AND A DISPLAY SYSTEM INCLUDING THE DISPLAY DEVICE | February 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18561216 | DISPLAY PANELS, COMPENSATION METHODS THEREOF, DEVICES FOR GENERATING COMPENSATION GRAYSCALES | November 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18475119 | RACING TREE DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS | September 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18466494 | GAME INTERACTIVE CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS, STORAGE MEDIUM AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | September 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18226892 | Mobile Game Controller and Method for Connecting to a Wireless Audio Device | July 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18350957 | INTERACTIVE CONTROL METHOD, APPARATUS, COMPUTER DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | July 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18152736 | DISPLAY MODULE AND INSPECTION METHOD OF THE SAME | January 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17908930 | DISPLAY INTENSITY REDUCTIONS | September 2022 | December 2023 | Abandon | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17694624 | GAMMA VOLTAGE GENERATING CIRCUIT, SOURCE DRIVER AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME | March 2022 | September 2023 | Abandon | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17680610 | IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS | February 2022 | December 2023 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17505585 | PROGRAMMABLE KEYBOARD SYSTEM | October 2021 | August 2023 | Abandon | 22 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16830795 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND TOUCH PANEL | March 2020 | November 2020 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16415222 | IMAGE DISPLAY SYSTEM, IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING IMAGE DISPLAY SYSTEM | May 2019 | February 2022 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15519347 | DETECTION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ARRAY SUBSTRATE ROW DRIVE CIRCUIT | May 2019 | October 2021 | Abandon | 54 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16396805 | Method, System and Apparatus for Augmented Reality | April 2019 | October 2021 | Abandon | 29 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14988572 | ARRAY SUBSTRATE, COLOR FILM SUBSTRATE AND TOUCH DISPLAY DEVICE | January 2016 | March 2021 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 10434609 | KEYPAD WITH EL UNITED IN KEYPAD RUBBER AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME | May 2003 | February 2007 | Allow | 46 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10305553 | DIRECTIONAL IMAGE DISPLAY | November 2002 | May 2006 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10188633 | SELF-POWERED SWITCH INITIATION SYSTEM | July 2002 | March 2006 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10177674 | SERVER APPARATUS, MOBILE TERMINAL, CONTENTS DISTRIBUTION METHOD, CONTENTS RECEPTION METHOD, AND PROGRAM PRODUCT | June 2002 | September 2005 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 09883448 | DRIVING METHOD OF PLASMA DISPLAY PANEL | June 2001 | July 2006 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner XIAO, KE works in Art Unit 2627 and has examined 11 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 54.5%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 42 months.
Examiner XIAO, KE's allowance rate of 54.5% places them in the 15% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by XIAO, KE receive 2.82 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 82% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by XIAO, KE is 42 months. This places the examiner in the 19% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +55.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by XIAO, KE. This interview benefit is in the 95% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 20.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 21% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 18.2% of allowed cases (in the 97% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 25% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.