USPTO Examiner ABDIN SHAHEDA A - Art Unit 2627

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19087247TOUCHPAD FORCE CALCULATION USING NO-TOUCH CAPACITANCEMarch 2025February 2026Allow1100YesNo
18815416DISPLAY DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFORAugust 2024January 2026Allow1720YesNo
18811364Compensation Circuit and Display Device Including SameAugust 2024February 2026Allow1710NoNo
18810775DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING THE SAMEAugust 2024February 2026Allow1710NoNo
18782025DATA DRIVING INTEGRATED CIRCUIT, DISPLAY APPARATUS, AND PIXEL COMPENSATION METHODJuly 2024January 2026Allow1820YesNo
18695698DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICEMarch 2024March 2026Allow2310NoNo
18609263ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOFMarch 2024February 2026Allow2320YesNo
18442957GATE DRIVING PANEL CIRCUIT, DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICEFebruary 2024November 2025Allow2110NoNo
18273801ELECTRONIC DEVICEJuly 2023January 2026Allow3020NoNo
18025176DISPLAY PANEL FPS SWITCHINGMarch 2023February 2026Allow3630YesNo
18153885DISPLAY APPARATUSJanuary 2023February 2026Allow3810NoNo
17993212ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAMENovember 2022November 2025Allow3610NoNo
17862999LIGHT EMITTING DISPLAY DEVICEJuly 2022January 2026Allow4220YesNo
17790207DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY APPARATUSJune 2022November 2025Allow4110NoNo
17835030DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICEJune 2022January 2026Allow4320NoNo
17707204DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAMEMarch 2022January 2026Allow4620NoNo
17651479DEVICE HAVING A CAMERA OVERLAID BY DISPLAYFebruary 2022February 2026Allow4870YesYes
15890545LIGHT SOURCE APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOFFebruary 2018March 2019Allow1300NoNo
15742037GOA CIRCUITJanuary 2018January 2019Allow1200NoNo
15742036GOA DRIVING CIRCUIT AND LCDJanuary 2018January 2019Allow1200NoNo
15742221DRIVING METHOD FOR LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY PANEL AND DEVICE OF THE SAMEJanuary 2018February 2019Allow1300NoNo
15727663PEN FOR CAPACITIVE TOUCH SYSTEMSOctober 2017March 2019Allow1720NoYes
15539692GOA CIRCUIT DRIVING ARCHITECTUREJune 2017January 2019Allow1810NoNo
15611395Systems and Methods for Multi-Output Electrostatic Haptic EffectsJune 2017February 2019Allow2040YesNo
15430898Systems and Methods for Surface Elements that Provide Electrostatic Haptic EffectsFebruary 2017June 2018Allow1620YesNo
15306561DISCRETE CURSOR MOVEMENT BASED ON TOUCH INPUTOctober 2016October 2018Allow2320NoNo
15072546ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSMarch 2016September 2016Allow620NoNo
14906352ARRAY SUBSTRATE WITH DATA LINE SHARING STRUCTUREJanuary 2016January 2019Allow3610YesNo
14964341TOUCH ENABLED USER DEVICE WITH UNPOWERED DISPLAYDecember 2015October 2018Allow3430YesNo
14695765LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYApril 2015June 2017Allow2610NoNo
14645021ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSMarch 2015July 2015Allow400NoNo
14421906PIXEL ARRAY AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF, DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICEFebruary 2015April 2017Allow2610NoNo
14622357ELECTRODE OF SELF-CAPACITIVE TOUCH PANEL UTILIZING SERPENTINE TRACE TO INCREASE RESISTANCEFebruary 2015January 2017Allow2310YesNo
14558597USING DISPLAY COMPONENTS FOR LIGHT SENSINGDecember 2014October 2016Allow2310YesNo
14486360Managing Information DisplaySeptember 2014September 2016Allow2420YesNo
14322701Systems and Methods for Multi-Output Electrostatic Haptic EffectsJuly 2014February 2017Allow3230NoNo
14322697Systems and Methods for Surface Elements that Provide Electrostatic Haptic EffectsJuly 2014October 2016Allow2820NoNo
14047160DISPLAY SYSTEMS FOR REDUCING POWER CONSUMPTION AND METHODS FOR DRIVING THE SAMEOctober 2013May 2015Allow2010NoNo
13844211DISPLAY APPARATUSMarch 2013March 2015Allow2410NoNo
13844262METHOD OF DISPLAYING A THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGE AND DISPLAY APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING THE METHODMarch 2013March 2015Allow2410NoNo
13821930TOUCH SWITCHMarch 2013March 2015Allow2410NoNo
13695702LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICENovember 2012September 2014Allow2200NoNo
13545694CAPACITIVE TOUCH CONTROL SENSORJuly 2012July 2014Allow2510NoNo
13544378TOUCH SCREEN WITH SOFT KEY ENABLING ELECTROMAGNETIC RESONANCE INPUTJuly 2012June 2017Allow6050YesYes
13515087PIXEL CIRCUIT, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR DRIVING DISPLAY DEVICEJune 2012July 2014Allow2500YesNo
13490666DISPLAY APPARATUS, DISPLAY METHOD, AND VEHICLEJune 2012November 2014Allow2920NoNo
13505600POSITION DETECTION SYSTEM, DISPLAY PANEL, AND DISPLAY DEVICEJune 2012May 2014Allow2410YesNo
13441352METHOD FOR DRIVING DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS APPLYING THE SAMEApril 2012April 2015Allow3630YesNo
13500766MOBILE TERMINAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD THEREOFApril 2012December 2014Allow3220NoNo
13440894Straight Line Gesture Recognition and RenderingApril 2012March 2015Allow3630NoNo
13391982Apparatus with Correlated Emitter-Detector PairsApril 2012June 2014Allow2710YesNo
13427147DISPLAY DEVICE AND DRIVING METHOD OF DISPLAY DEVICEMarch 2012March 2014Allow2410NoNo
13070922INFORMATION PRESENTING DEVICE, TACTILE SENSE PRESENTING METHOD, AND PROGRAMMarch 2011January 2015Allow4630NoNo
13070986DISPLAY APPARATUSMarch 2011February 2014Allow3510YesNo
12999327LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY AND PIXEL DISPLAYING STRUCTURE THEREOFDecember 2010November 2014Allow4730NoNo
12955036ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSNovember 2010November 2014Allow4850YesYes
12902021METHOD FOR DISPLAYING A MENU IN MOBILE TERMINAL AND MOBILE TERMINAL THEREOFOctober 2010March 2014Allow4130YesNo
12674380FLEXIBLE DISPLAY AND A METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A FLEXIBLE DISPLAYJune 2010May 2014Allow5030NoNo
12672831TOUCHPAD WITH STRIP-SHAPED INPUT AREAMay 2010June 2013Allow4010NoNo
12716275LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE WITH ADAPTIVE CHARGING/DISCHARGING TIME AND RELATED DRIVING METHODMarch 2010October 2012Allow3110NoNo
12643896HYBRID LOW POWER COMPUTER MOUSEDecember 2009May 2014Allow5350NoNo
12572204SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SWITCHING BETWEEN AN ELECTRONIC PAPER DISPLAY AND A VIDEO DISPLAYOctober 2009December 2013Allow5020YesYes
12571708APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING INPUT IN COMPUTING EQUIPMENT WITH TOUCH SCREENOctober 2009June 2016Allow6040YesYes
12520726DISPLAY APPARATUS AND DRIVE METHOD THEREOFJune 2009April 2013Allow4610YesNo
12519708ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFORJune 2009July 2014Allow6050YesNo
12517497INPUT APPARATUS, CONTROL APPARATUS, CONTROL SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD, AND HANDHELD APPARATUSJune 2009January 2013Allow4410YesNo
12518649IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAMJune 2009October 2012Allow4010NoNo
12282055PLASMA DISPLAY DEVICE AND PLASMA DISPLAY PANEL DRIVE METHODOctober 2008December 2012Allow5750NoNo
12289200WEARABLE DISPLAYOctober 2008September 2013Allow5940NoNo
12110797Option Menu for Use with a Computer Management SystemApril 2008September 2013Allow6030YesYes
12106835PORTABLE TERMINALApril 2008October 2013Allow6040NoNo
12106645INFORMATION DISPLAY DEVICE, INFORMATION DISPLAYING METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTApril 2008March 2013Allow5920YesNo
12106091DETERMINING A POSITION OF A POINTING DEVICEApril 2008September 2012Allow5320YesNo
11995480SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFICATION OF DISPLAYSMarch 2008June 2013Allow6030YesNo
12010384INFORMATION OUTPUT UNIT AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSJanuary 2008March 2013Allow6030YesNo
11826347OPERATION BODY, INFORMATION-INPUT DEVICE, AND INFORMATION TERMINAL DEVICEJuly 2007November 2012Allow6040NoNo
11273972User control input deviceNovember 2005August 2014Allow6050YesYes
10518772CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENT FOR A DISPLAY DEVICE WHICH CAN BE OPERATED IN A PARTIAL MODEAugust 2005May 2012Allow6090NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner ABDIN, SHAHEDA A.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
1
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
73.7%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
7
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(42.9%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
4
(57.1%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
70.8%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 42.9% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner ABDIN, SHAHEDA A - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner ABDIN, SHAHEDA A works in Art Unit 2627 and has examined 61 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner ABDIN, SHAHEDA A's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by ABDIN, SHAHEDA A receive 2.20 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 60% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ABDIN, SHAHEDA A is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ABDIN, SHAHEDA A. This interview benefit is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 35.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 78% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 49% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 77.8% of appeals filed. This is in the 69% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 57.1% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 19% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 25% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.