Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18882585 | SENSOR CONTROLLER, ACTIVE PEN, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD | September 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18882538 | PEN STATE DETECTION CIRCUIT, METHOD, AND DEVICE, AND PARAMETER SUPPLY DEVICE | September 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18769856 | NOISE COMPENSATION USING A SPATIAL NOISE MODEL | July 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18768838 | BACKLIGHT PIXEL DRIVING CIRCUIT AND DISPLAY DEVICE | July 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18766781 | SHIFT REGISTER CIRCUIT | July 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18721895 | EYE SENSING | June 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18745452 | Display Device and Pen Touch System | June 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18669984 | MULTI-OBJECT TRACKING USING CORRELATION FILTERS IN VIDEO ANALYTICS APPLICATIONS | May 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18686075 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | February 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18682271 | VIRTUAL INPUT ELEMENT DISPLAY METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | February 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18427434 | DEVICES, METHODS, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES FOR DISPLAYING SETS OF CONTROLS IN RESPONSE TO GAZE AND/OR GESTURE INPUTS | January 2024 | April 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18580041 | DISPLAY APPARATUS, DRIVING METHOD, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | January 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18399877 | DISPLAY DEVICE | December 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18395374 | INTERACTIVE METHOD, APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | December 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18504192 | NAVIGATION DEVICE WITH IMPROVED LIGHT UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY AND OPTICAL ENGINE THEREOF | November 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18558487 | PIXEL CIRCUIT, PIXEL DRIVING METHOD AND DISPLAY DEVICE | November 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18471103 | REGISTRATION DEVICE AND REGISTRATION METHOD | September 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18330070 | MOTOR VEHICLE | June 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 24 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18329991 | MOTOR VEHICLE | June 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 25 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 18308490 | DISPLAY DEVICE | April 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 26 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17723510 | HUMAN EMULATION ROBOT DISPLAY SYSTEM | April 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17483832 | STRAPLESS AUTONOMOUS EXTENDED REALITY VIEWER | September 2021 | August 2025 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17469109 | HYBRID SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LOW-LATENCY USER INPUT PROCESSING AND FEEDBACK | September 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 46 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner ARONOVICH, OLGA works in Art Unit 2621 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 47 months.
Examiner ARONOVICH, OLGA's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by ARONOVICH, OLGA receive 3.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 86% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ARONOVICH, OLGA is 47 months. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ARONOVICH, OLGA. This interview benefit is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 33.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 200.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 19% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 24% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.