Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19051168 | DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE | February 2025 | January 2026 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18965069 | DISPLAY DEVICE | December 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18939066 | DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE | November 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18918371 | MULTI-USER MULTI-TOUCH PROJECTED CAPACITANCE TOUCH SENSOR WITH EVENT INITIATION BASED ON COMMON TOUCH ENTITY DETECTION | October 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18915290 | DISPLAY APPARATUS | October 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18672250 | DISPLAY PANEL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | May 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18613749 | PIXEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME | March 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18683065 | HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTING DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS THEREOF | February 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18421945 | ELECTRONIC SYSTEM CONTROL METHOD WHICH CAN AUTOMATICALLY SET PERIPHERAL OPERATION MODE | January 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18401975 | DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS | January 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18569234 | ARRAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY PANEL | December 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18523275 | EYE MOVEMENT DETECTING DEVICE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND SYSTEM | November 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 23 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18506134 | DISPLAY DEVICE | November 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 19 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18380116 | SHARED-CONTENT SESSION USER INTERFACES | October 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 18370868 | DISPLAY DEVICE | September 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18221182 | INTUITIVE AUGMENTED REALITY COLLABORATION ON VISUAL DATA | July 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17921607 | DISPLAY PANEL, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR DISPLAY PANEL | October 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17800576 | DISPLAY ASSEMBLY AND DISPLAY APPARATUS | August 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17363175 | VIRTUAL AMBIENT ILLUMINANCE SENSOR SYSTEM | June 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 48 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner ABDIN, SHAHEDA A.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner ABDIN, SHAHEDA A works in Art Unit 2621 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.
Examiner ABDIN, SHAHEDA A's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by ABDIN, SHAHEDA A receive 4.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 97% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ABDIN, SHAHEDA A is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 100.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 19% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 24% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.