USPTO Examiner NGUYEN ANH TUAN V - Art Unit 2619

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19257429DIGITAL TWIN-BASED INTELLIGENT SLOPE MONITORING METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND STORAGE MEDIAJuly 2025September 2025Allow200NoNo
18646381INTERFACES, SYSTEMS AND APPARATUSES FOR CONSTRUCTING 3D AR ENVIRONMENT OVERLAYS, AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SAMEApril 2024September 2025Allow1720NoNo
18633935METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING PICKED OBJECT, COMPUTER DEVICE, READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTApril 2024December 2025Allow2000NoNo
18527769ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR DISPLAYING VIRTUAL OBJECT AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOFDecember 2023February 2026Allow2610YesNo
18506004GENERATION OF A VIRTUAL VIEWPOINT IMAGE OF A PERSON FROM A SINGLE CAPTURED IMAGENovember 2023February 2026Allow2710NoNo
18386087THREE-DIMENSIONAL INVERSION METHOD OF AIRBORNE TRANSIENT ELECTROMAGNETICS BASED ON DEEP LEARNINGNovember 2023August 2025Allow2210NoNo
18499924METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ESTIMATING A DEPTH MAP ASSOCIATED WITH A DIGITAL HOLOGRAM REPRESENTING A SCENE AND COMPUTER PROGRAM ASSOCIATEDNovember 2023March 2026Abandon2910NoNo
18379231METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND SYSTEM FOR CUSTOMIZING MOTION-BASED PROJECTIONOctober 2023December 2025Abandon2610NoNo
18476167DECOMPOSING AND RECOMPOSING SCENES USING NEURAL RADIANCE FIELDSSeptember 2023October 2025Allow2510NoNo
18472826SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FACE ASSET CREATION AND MODELS FROM ONE OR MORE IMAGESSeptember 2023February 2026Allow2910NoNo
18275193An Athlete's Perspective Sports Game Broadcast System Based On VR TechnologyJuly 2023August 2025Allow2510NoNo
18274923A METHOD AND AN APPARATUS FOR EDITING MULTIPLE VIDEO SHOTSJuly 2023October 2025Allow2710YesNo
18262662COLOR AND INFRA-RED THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTION USING IMPLICIT RADIANCE FUNCTIONSJuly 2023October 2025Allow2710YesNo
18354485CONTROLLABLE IMAGE GENERATIONJuly 2023October 2025Allow2710YesNo
18345460SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRIMITIVE ID MAP SAMPLINGJune 2023August 2025Allow2610NoNo
18252118Learning Articulated Shape Reconstruction from ImageryMay 2023November 2025Allow3010YesNo
18127310CONTINUOUS RENDERING FOR MOBILE APPARATUSESMarch 2023October 2025Allow3120NoNo
18189616Coordination Between Independent Rendering FrameworksMarch 2023November 2025Abandon3210NoNo
18188600AUGMENTED REALITY ENVIRONMENT MELDINGMarch 2023March 2026Allow3630YesNo
18156342SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF GUIDED INSTRUCTIONS OR SUPPORT USING A VIRTUAL OBJECTJanuary 2023August 2025Allow3130YesNo
18156185ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING DISPLAY THAT OPTIMALLY DISPLAY CONTENT WITH RESPECT TO CAMERA HOLE, AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING DISPLAY THEREOFJanuary 2023December 2025Allow3540YesNo
17764718SPEECH IMAGE PROVIDING METHOD AND COMPUTING DEVICE FOR PERFORMING THE SAMEDecember 2022October 2025Allow4310NoNo
18145513COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED TRAINING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USER-INTERACTIVE TRAINING OF METHODS PERFORMABLE IN AN IVD LABORATORY SYSTEMDecember 2022September 2025Allow3310YesNo
17988499SYSTEM FOR AND METHOD OF GRAPHICALLY REPRESENTING INFORMATIONNovember 2022January 2026Allow3840YesNo
17981074TRAINABLE VISUAL QUALITY METRICS FOR MEASURING RENDERING QUALITY IN A GRAPHICS ENVIRONMENTNovember 2022January 2026Abandon3840YesNo
17777699METHOD FOR DISPLAYING A SURROUNDINGS MODEL OF A VEHICLE, COMPUTER PROGRAM, ELECTRONIC CONTROL UNIT AND VEHICLEMay 2022September 2025Allow4050YesNo
17742147METHOD OF GENERATING PRINTHEAD ACTUATION DATA FOR PRINTING A 3-D OBJECTMay 2022October 2025Abandon4120NoNo
17571239ASSIGNING PRIMITIVES TO TILES IN A GRAPHICS PROCESSING SYSTEMJanuary 2022October 2025Allow4640NoYes
17569945VOLUMETRIC VIDEO FROM AN IMAGE SOURCEJanuary 2022November 2025Abandon4660YesNo
17278989INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM FOR GENERATING A FILE INDICATING TYPES OF STREAM ATTRIBUTESMarch 2021October 2025Abandon5560NoNo
12332477Methods, Systems, and Products for Graphing Data to Reduce OverlapDecember 2008August 2013Allow5630YesNo
12288472Display control apparatus and method, program, and recording media for display of a list of program information using three axesOctober 2008July 2013Allow5740NoNo
12198410METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING IMAGE DISPLAY DATAAugust 2008August 2013Allow5950YesNo
12169169IMAGE GENERATING APPARATUS AND IMAGE GENERATING METHOD FOR PERFORMING WRITING AND READING OF IMAGE BY USING PLURAL BUFFERS TO GENERATE IMAGE FRAME, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMJuly 2008October 2013Allow6030YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner NGUYEN, ANH TUAN V - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner NGUYEN, ANH TUAN V works in Art Unit 2619 and has examined 5 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 80.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 57 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner NGUYEN, ANH TUAN V's allowance rate of 80.0% places them in the 49% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by NGUYEN, ANH TUAN V receive 4.20 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 98% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by NGUYEN, ANH TUAN V is 57 months. This places the examiner in the 1% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +50.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by NGUYEN, ANH TUAN V. This interview benefit is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 38% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 18% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 24% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.