Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18710837 | Hyper-Personalized Augmented Objects | May 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18662337 | THREAD SCHEDULING OVER COMPUTE BLOCKS FOR POWER OPTIMIZATION | May 2024 | March 2026 | Abandon | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18658567 | CAPTURE AND DISPLAY OF POINT CLOUDS USING AUGMENTED REALITY DEVICE | May 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18643549 | DYNAMIC SCALE FOR VECTOR GRAPHIC RENDERING | April 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18698835 | LCD Display Unit for Use in a Reflection Display System in a Motor Vehicle, and Reflection Display System | April 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18607842 | ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING CONTENT | March 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18590770 | ACCIDENT RE-CREATION USING AUGMENTED REALITY | February 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18686587 | ROBUST FACIAL ANIMATION FROM VIDEO AND AUDIO | February 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18587252 | IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD THEREOF | February 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18443335 | METHOD FOR ADJUSTING A SIZE OF A VIRTUAL SCENE COMPRISING A PLURALITY OF OBJECTS | February 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18293314 | OVERLAY ADAPTATION FOR VISUAL DISCRIMINATION | January 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18292099 | DATA COMPRESSION EQUIPMENT, DATA COMPRESSION METHODS, AND PROGRAMS | January 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18391816 | METHOD FOR EDITING THREE-DIMENSIONAL VOLUMETRIC DATA | December 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18502868 | MODEL FINE-TUNING FOR AUTOMATED AUGMENTED REALITY DESCRIPTIONS | November 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18384354 | HEAD-MOUNTED ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR CONVERTING A SCREEN OF AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE INTO EXTENDED REALITY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE CONNECTED THERETO | October 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18465827 | HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAY DEVICE WITH SELECTIVE COLOR SEE-THROUGH VISOR | September 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18362665 | AUGMENTED REALITY DISPLAY DEVICE AND NEAR-EYE DISPLAY DEVICE | July 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18227447 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUGMENTED REALITY DETECTION OF LOOSE PHARMACY ITEMS | July 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18340628 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUGMENTED REALITY IN AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS | June 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18208550 | AR DISPLAY DEVICE FOR VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING SAME | June 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18207013 | VIDEO CLIP OBJECT TRACKING | June 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18256112 | OPTICAL ASSEMBLY FOR USE IN AN OBJECT HANDLING STATION | June 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18200111 | EXPERIENCE SHARING SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF | May 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18312802 | METHOD FOR PROCESSING MEDICAL IMAGES | May 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18031263 | MOTION VISUALIZATION SYSTEM AND THE MOTION VISUALIZATION METHOD | April 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18192880 | HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAY APPARATUS | March 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18185448 | SPLIT COMPUTE REPROJECTION | March 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18181651 | IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM AND STORAGE MEDIUM | March 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18151284 | NATURAL HAND RENDERING IN XR SYSTEMS | January 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18083344 | Controlling Augmented Reality Content Via Selection of Real-World Locations or Objects | December 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18065269 | AUGMENTED REALITY VISUALIZATION OF AN ACTION ON AN IDENTIFIED OBJECT | December 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18061372 | AUGMENTED REALITY ENHANCED MEDIA | December 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17931173 | DYNAMIC CORRECTION OF HOLOGRAPHIC CONTENT TO BE DISPLAYED ON A FOLDABLE MOBILE DEVICE | September 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 38 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17688660 | COOPERATION AMONG MULTIPLE DISPLAY SYSTEMS TO PROVIDE A HEALTHCARE USER CUSTOMIZED INFORMATION | March 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17671986 | PROVIDING GUIDANCE REGARDING CONTENT VIEWED VIA AUGMENTED REALITY DEVICES | February 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17377122 | REMOTE LANDMARK RENDERING FOR EXTENDED REALITY INTERFACES | July 2021 | July 2025 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17007699 | AUGMENTED REALITY DISPLAY SYSTEM, PROGRAM, AND METHOD | August 2020 | January 2021 | Allow | 4 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16754259 | Display Device for a Driving System for Automated Driving for Displaying the Active Automated Driving Mode | April 2020 | July 2025 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16639516 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A 3D DIGITAL MODEL USED FOR CREATING A HAIRPIECE | February 2020 | April 2021 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16567793 | Game Rendering Method, Terminal, and Non-Transitory Computer-Readable Storage Medium | September 2019 | February 2021 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16432083 | PRESENTING INFORMATION ON OBJECT TO BE OBSERVED | June 2019 | February 2021 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16108086 | CAPTURING AND DISPLAYING A VIDEO IN AN IMMERSIVE REALITY ENVIRONMENT | August 2018 | March 2020 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16020391 | VISUAL FLAIRS FOR EMPHASIZING GESTURES IN ARTIFICIAL-REALITY ENVIRONMENTS | June 2018 | May 2020 | Allow | 23 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16012855 | DISPLAY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | June 2018 | March 2019 | Allow | 9 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15738622 | IMAGE GENERATION DEVICE | December 2017 | March 2020 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15821151 | IMAGE FORMING DEVICE EXECUTING DRAWING PROCESS AND RECORDING MEDIUM | November 2017 | June 2019 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15563472 | DISPLAY CONTROL APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD, PROGRAM FOR DISPLAY CONTROL, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | September 2017 | August 2020 | Allow | 34 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15715367 | RAY CASTING VISUALIZATION MULTI-USER INTERACTION PROCESSING METHOD BASED ON HADOOP AND CUDA | September 2017 | February 2018 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15646537 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE | July 2017 | July 2019 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15126041 | DISPLAY CONTROL APPARATUS AND DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD | September 2016 | September 2019 | Allow | 36 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 15064145 | MANAGING RENDERING TARGETS FOR GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNITS | March 2016 | November 2017 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14863462 | GRAPH DISPLAY APPARATUS, ITS OPERATION METHOD AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM HAVING STORED THEREIN GRAPH DISPLAY PROGRAM | September 2015 | December 2017 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14748574 | METHODS, APPARATUSES, AND SYSTEMS FOR REMOTE PLAY | June 2015 | August 2017 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14423922 | DETERMINING SPACE TO DISPLAY CONTENT IN AUGMENTED REALITY | February 2015 | May 2017 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14630729 | CONSTRUCTING FONTS FROM SCANNED IMAGES FOR RENDERING TEXT | February 2015 | February 2017 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14539606 | IDENTIFYING AND OBSCURING FACES OF SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS IN AN IMAGE | November 2014 | July 2017 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14538276 | Method and Apparatus for Shadow Estimation and Spreading | November 2014 | September 2016 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14377754 | GRADATION DRAWING DEVICE | August 2014 | January 2017 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14376522 | MEDICAL IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS AND MEDICAL IMAGE DISPLAY METHOD | August 2014 | November 2016 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14445238 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE WITH DIFFERENT PROCESSING MODES | July 2014 | May 2017 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14373512 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VIDEO FRAME SEQUENCE CONTROL | July 2014 | April 2016 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14334793 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | July 2014 | December 2016 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14199771 | ELASTIC NAVIGATION FOR FIXED LAYOUT CONTENT | March 2014 | October 2016 | Allow | 32 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14173925 | IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM | February 2014 | August 2015 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14075108 | GENERATING METHOD OF GAMMA VALUE TEST CHART OF DISPLAY DEVICE AND MEASURING METHOD OF GAMMA VALUE THEREOF | November 2013 | October 2015 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14062343 | Server-Based Fast Remote Display on Client Devices | October 2013 | February 2017 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14046638 | USER INTERFACE TECHNIQUES FOR SIMULATING THREE-DIMENSIONAL DEPTH | October 2013 | March 2016 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14033263 | GRAPH DISPLAY CONTROL DEVICE, GRAPH DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD AND GRAPH DISPLAY CONTROL PROGRAM | September 2013 | December 2015 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14032458 | WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICE CONFIGURED TO CAPTURE ORIENTATION INFORMATION AND ORIENTATION INFORMATION GATHERING METHOD | September 2013 | October 2017 | Allow | 49 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14006561 | VEHICULAR APPARATUS AND EXTERNAL DEVICE SCREEN IMAGE DISPLAY SYSTEM | September 2013 | January 2016 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14004712 | IMAGE SIGNAL PROCESSING DEVICE, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND TELEVISION DEVICE FOR REDUCING UNEVEN LUMINANCE IN IMAGE SIGNALS | September 2013 | August 2015 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13918712 | VIRTUAL DISPLAY DEVICE DRIVERS COMPATIBLE WITH WINDOWS DISPLAY DRIVER MODEL | June 2013 | May 2015 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13824713 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING/RECEIVING IMAGE DATA AT HIGH SPEED | March 2013 | September 2015 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13833870 | Display Device Comprising Grayscale Conversion Portion and Display Portion | March 2013 | September 2016 | Allow | 42 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 13823888 | COLOR INFORMATION GENERATION DEVICE, COLOR INFORMATION GENERATION METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | March 2013 | April 2015 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13824022 | MAP SYMBOL DRAWING DEVICE | March 2013 | January 2015 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13835761 | DRAWING DATA GENERATION APPARATUS, DRAWING DATA GENERATION METHOD, PROGRAM, AND DRAWING DATA GENERATION SYSTEM FOR CHANGING MAGNIFICATION OF DISPLAYED IMAGES | March 2013 | June 2015 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13732020 | Method and Apparatus for Improving Speed of Rasterizing Transparent Images | December 2012 | June 2015 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner LI, GRACE Q.
With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner LI, GRACE Q works in Art Unit 2618 and has examined 43 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 26 months.
Examiner LI, GRACE Q's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by LI, GRACE Q receive 1.84 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 42% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LI, GRACE Q is 26 months. This places the examiner in the 76% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LI, GRACE Q. This interview benefit is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 32.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 40.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 62% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 10% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 18% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 24% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.