Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18439182 | DISPLACEMENT-CENTRIC ACCELERATION FOR RAY TRACING | February 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18395195 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPERATING A DISPLAY SYSTEM BASED ON USER PERCEPTIBILITY | December 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18537388 | Hardware Acceleration for Motion Blur with Ray Tracing | December 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18563997 | RAY TRACING CHANNEL MODELING METHOD FOR RECONFIGURABLE INTELLIGENT SURFACE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION | November 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18225493 | TEXTURE SAMPLING METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON MERGE PROCESSING OF TEXEL REQUESTS | July 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 32 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18248306 | METHOD FOR SIMULATING THE EFFECTS OF THE OPTICAL QUALITY OF WINDSHIELD | April 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18296712 | IMAGE TEXTURE GENERATION METHOD BASED ON 3D SIMPLIFIED MODEL AND RELATED DEVICE | April 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18175813 | SPATIOTEMPORAL SELF-GUIDED SHADOW DENOISING IN RAY-TRACING APPLICATIONS | February 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17987847 | MESH ZIPPERING | November 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17946509 | EFFICIENCY OF RAY-BOX TESTS | September 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17946678 | OBJECT SHELLING AND HOLLOWING | September 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17883474 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL SHARING | August 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 41 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17515320 | MESH RETEXTURING IN AN EXTENDED REALITY ENVIRONMENT | October 2021 | July 2025 | Allow | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15834659 | VISUALIZATION OF CONNECTED DATA | December 2017 | January 2019 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15466371 | CURVE EDITING MECHANISM | March 2017 | October 2018 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15252616 | VISUALIZATION OF CONNECTED DATA | August 2016 | December 2018 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15218808 | VERTEX SHADERS FOR BINNING BASED GRAPHICS PROCESSING | July 2016 | June 2018 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15218015 | GRAPHICS PROCESSING SYSTEMS | July 2016 | July 2018 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14875886 | Texture Blending Between View-Dependent Texture and Base Texture in a Geographic Information System | October 2015 | October 2016 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14550454 | IMAGE DISPLAY SYSTEM AND METHOD OF FITTING MULTIPLE MODELS TO IMAGE | November 2014 | September 2017 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14123610 | OBJECT DETECTION FRAME DISPLAY DEVICE AND OBJECT DETECTION FRAME DISPLAY METHOD | December 2013 | August 2015 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14055257 | 3-DIMENSIONAL SHAPE RECONSTRUCTION DEVICE USING DEPTH IMAGE AND COLOR IMAGE AND THE METHOD | October 2013 | April 2016 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14054951 | IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | October 2013 | November 2015 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13994100 | METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF INFORMATION REPRESENTATIVE OF A PIXEL OF A VIRTUAL OBJECT | June 2013 | March 2016 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13729129 | Detecting and Describing Visible Features on a Visualization | December 2012 | December 2015 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13674228 | INFORMATION DISPLAY APPARATUS, METHOD THEREOF AND PROGRAM THEREOF | November 2012 | December 2015 | Allow | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13650282 | Detecting and Describing Visible Features on a Visualization | October 2012 | November 2015 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner DOAN, PHUC N works in Art Unit 2618 and has examined 15 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 28 months.
Examiner DOAN, PHUC N's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by DOAN, PHUC N receive 1.73 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 37% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DOAN, PHUC N is 28 months. This places the examiner in the 68% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DOAN, PHUC N. This interview benefit is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 47.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 28.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 40% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 18% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 24% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.