USPTO Examiner MAZUMDER TAPAS - Art Unit 2615

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18754454VIDEO CONFIRMATION COMPUTERJune 2024February 2025Allow810YesNo
18622566Image Data Set Alignment for an AR Headset Using Anatomic Structures and Data FittingMarch 2024January 2025Allow900YesNo
18617611ANATOMICAL MODEL DISPLAYINGMarch 2024November 2024Allow700NoNo
18615948REAL-TIME DATA SOURCE AND CONFIGURATION IDENTIFICATION FOR GEOSPATIAL COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENTSMarch 2024July 2024Allow300NoNo
184191633D CAPTIONS WITH SEMANTIC GRAPHICAL ELEMENTSJanuary 2024April 2025Allow1510YesNo
18412340DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DISPLAYING AN IMAGE THEREONJanuary 2024March 2025Allow1410YesNo
18509038EARLY RELEASE OF RESOURCES IN RAY TRACING HARDWARENovember 2023September 2024Allow1010NoNo
18382045CONFIGURABLE EXTREMITY VISIBILITYOctober 2023June 2025Allow2000NoNo
18372551AUGMENTED REALITY SYSTEM TO PROVIDE RECOMMENDATION TO REPAIR OR REPLACE AN EXISTING DEVICE TO IMPROVE HOME SCORESeptember 2023May 2025Allow2000YesNo
18465404IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL DISPLAYSeptember 2023March 2025Allow1810YesNo
18455200Systems and Methods for Displaying Augmented Anatomical FeaturesAugust 2023December 2024Allow1620YesNo
18229401DYNAMIC INPUT SYSTEM FOR SMART GLASSES BASED ON USER AVAILABILITY STATESAugust 2023September 2024Allow1310YesNo
18339780BODY MESH RECONSTRUCTION FROM RGB IMAGEJune 2023April 2025Allow2200NoNo
18202575DYNAMIC AUGMENTED REALITY COMPONENTSMay 2023March 2024Allow910NoNo
18323313EXTENDED REALITY (XR) 360� SYSTEM AND TOOL SUITEMay 2023April 2025Allow2200NoNo
18037106VIDEO OUTPUT DEVICEMay 2023June 2025Allow2510NoNo
18135638GHOST VISUALIZATION FOR AUGMENTED REALITY (AR) SURGICAL SYSTEMS AND METHODSApril 2023May 2025Allow2500NoNo
18298066SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTERACTIVE VIDEO CONFERENCINGApril 2023September 2024Allow1720NoNo
18184094Graphics ProcessingMarch 2023November 2024Allow2000NoNo
18119496GEO-SPATIAL AR CONTENT ANCHORING AND NFT MINTING SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED PROCESSESMarch 2023October 2024Allow1900NoNo
18117687THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA CREATION METHOD, CLIENT DEVICE, AND SERVERMarch 2023July 2024Allow1620YesNo
18169985METHOD FOR MULTI-VIEW POINT CLOUD REGISTRATION FOR WHOLE AIRCRAFT BASED ON SPHERICAL HARMONIC FEATURE (SHF)February 2023January 2025Allow2300NoNo
18150241SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PARAMETRIC CAPTURE OF LIVE-STREAMING EVENTSJanuary 2023February 2025Allow2600NoNo
18150581SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTERACTIVE VIDEO CONFERENCINGJanuary 2023September 2024Allow2100NoNo
18081593TECHNIQUES FOR IMPROVED LIGHTING MODELS FOR APPEARANCE CAPTUREDecember 2022March 2025Allow2710YesNo
18065202FINE-SCALE MOVEMENT TRACKING OF UNDERWATER OBJECTSDecember 2022September 2024Allow2100NoNo
18077424CONFIGURABLE MULTIPLE-DIE GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNITDecember 2022March 2025Allow2720YesNo
18061657SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE SYNTHETIC LIP SYNCHRONIZATION HAVING FAITHFUL TEXTURESDecember 2022September 2024Allow2100NoNo
17928813GRAPHICS RENDERING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUMNovember 2022May 2025Allow3010NoNo
17961878COMMUNICATION EXCHANGE SYSTEM FOR REMOTELY COMMUNICATING INSTRUCTIONSOctober 2022July 2024Allow2210NoNo
17936043METHOD, APPARATUS, AND DEVICE FOR PROCESSING IMAGES, AND STORAGE MEDIUMSeptember 2022April 2025Allow3010NoNo
17934911APPARATUS FOR DISPLAYING AT LEAST ONE VIRTUAL LANE LINE BASED ON ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING SAMESeptember 2022November 2024Allow2600NoNo
17933959Selective Depth AnalysisSeptember 2022September 2024Allow2410NoNo
17949087METHOD AND SYSTEMS FOR LABELLING MOTION-CAPTURED POINTSSeptember 2022June 2025Abandon3310NoNo
17945196Feedback Using Coverage for Object ScanningSeptember 2022February 2025Allow2920YesNo
17797517Systems and methods for automatically adjusting design element attributesAugust 2022February 2025Allow3120YesNo
17880191IMPROVING ACCURACY OF INTERACTIONS FOR GAZE-ENABLED AR OBJECTS WHEN IN MOTIONAugust 2022August 2024Allow2410NoNo
17835673SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LIGHT-WEIGHT NETWORKED VOLUMETRIC ASSET CONTROLJune 2022July 2024Allow2510NoNo
17751661METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VIRTUAL AND SEMI-VIRTUAL EVENTS AND EXHIBITSMay 2022April 2025Allow3410NoNo
17773328METHOD OF DETECTING COLLISION OF OBJECTS, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUMApril 2022October 2024Allow3010NoNo
17659792DEVICES, METHODS AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES FOR GOAL-BASED ANIMATIONApril 2022October 2024Allow3010YesNo
17723227ASSOCIATING DEVICE COORDINATE SYSTEMS IN A MULTI-PERSON AUGMENTED REALITY SYSTEMApril 2022July 2024Allow2710NoNo
17709093HEAD-TRACKING BASED MEDIA SELECTION FOR VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTSMarch 2022July 2024Allow2810NoNo
17698863MICROLENSES PROVIDING WIDE RANGE CHIEF RAY ANGLE MANIPULATION FOR A PANEL DISPLAYMarch 2022February 2025Abandon3520NoNo
17674561SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISPLAYING AND ADJUSTING VIRTUAL OBJECTS BASED ON INTERACTIVE AND DYNAMIC CONTENTFebruary 2022August 2024Allow3020NoNo
17650918INTERACTIVELY DEFINING AN OBJECT SEGMENTATIONFebruary 2022July 2024Allow2920YesNo
17604936METHOD FOR EVALUATING AN ORTHODONTIC ALIGNEROctober 2021August 2024Allow3410NoNo
17356043TYPED UNORDERED ACCESS VIEW OVERLOADING ON PIXEL PIPELINEJune 2021January 2025Allow4310YesNo
17060836IMAGE GENERATION USING ONE OR MORE NEURAL NETWORKSOctober 2020September 2024Allow4850YesNo
15696292VISUAL MUSIC COLOR CONTROL SYSTEMSeptember 2017January 2018Allow510NoNo
15283112MOBILE DEVICE WITH DISPLAY OVERLAID WITH AT LEAST A LIGHT SENSORSeptember 2016May 2017Allow710NoNo
14972852METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE REPRODUCED IN A CURVED-SURFACE DISPLAYDecember 2015March 2017Allow1510NoNo
14874342VISUAL MUSIC COLOR CONTROL SYSTEMOctober 2015July 2017Allow2100YesNo
14782013Image Raster RotationOctober 2015May 2017Allow3200NoNo
14473758DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION IN COOPERATION WITH DEPTH OF VIRTUAL OBJECT AND CONTROLLING METHOD THEREOFAugust 2014December 2016Allow2810YesNo
14370593DISPLAY DEVICE AND COMPUTERJuly 2014July 2016Allow2520NoNo
14137709ADJUSTING GRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR RECOGNITION INTERFACESDecember 2013October 2017Allow4630NoNo
138560713D DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING IMAGE USING THE SAMEApril 2013July 2014Allow1510YesNo
13391680RECEPTION DISPLAY APPARATUS, INFORMATION TRANSMISSION APPARATUS, OPTICAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, RECEPTION DISPLAY INTEGRATED CIRCUIT, INFORMATION TRANSMISSION INTEGRATED CIRCUIT, RECEPTION DISPLAY PROGRAM, INFORMATION TRANSMISSION PROGRAM, AND OPTICAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHODFebruary 2012April 2016Allow5020YesNo
13253924Process Communication Method and SystemOctober 2011September 2016Allow5960NoNo
13255896METHOD AND DEVICE FOR FORMING SURFACE PROCESSED DATASeptember 2011October 2015Allow4940YesNo
13176250DISPLAY DEVICE AND IMAGE DISPLAY METHODJuly 2011April 2014Allow3320YesNo
13017623COLOR PROCESSING DEVICE, COLOR PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAMJanuary 2011March 2014Allow3720YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner MAZUMDER, TAPAS - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MAZUMDER, TAPAS works in Art Unit 2615 and has examined 57 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 96.5%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 25 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MAZUMDER, TAPAS's allowance rate of 96.5% places them in the 89% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MAZUMDER, TAPAS receive 1.21 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 21% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MAZUMDER, TAPAS is 25 months. This places the examiner in the 66% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +5.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MAZUMDER, TAPAS. This interview benefit is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 36.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 36.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 22% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.