Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18613077 | IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MAPPING ERRORS OR ARTIFACTS | March 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18598982 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TIMELINE VISUALIZATION | March 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18533301 | AR DISPLAY APPARATUS AND AR DISPLAY METHOD | December 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18483028 | Systems and methods for recolouring vector graphics | October 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18450317 | AUGMENTED REALITY INTERFACE AND METHOD OF USE | August 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18333766 | Preserving Document Design Using Font Synthesis | June 2023 | June 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18072086 | CONTROL DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM FOR DISPLAYING THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE | November 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17963947 | TECHNOLOGY FOR REPLICATING AND/OR CONTROLLING OBJECTS IN EXTENDED REALITY | October 2022 | October 2024 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17950841 | GENERATING MULTIPLE RESOLUTIONS OF A VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENT | September 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17799762 | TERMINAL DEVICE AND RF POWER SUPPLY DEVICE | August 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17887815 | Digital Object Animation Authoring Interfaces | August 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17875428 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE | July 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17874770 | HEAD-FRAME SYMBOLOGY ISOLATION FOR HEAD WORN DISPLAY (HWD) | July 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17851448 | VIRTUAL SELFIE STICK | June 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 31 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17805997 | ANALYSIS SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SIGNAL EYE DIAGRAMS | June 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17743432 | STATIC ELECTRICITY VISUALIZATION SYSTEM | May 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17735592 | Systems and Methods for 3D Registration of Curves and Surfaces Using Local Differential Information | May 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17714496 | CONTEXTUAL AWARENESS OF USER INTERFACE MENUS | April 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 22 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17693881 | MEDIA COMPOSITOR FOR COMPUTER-GENERATED REALITY | March 2022 | June 2023 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17687943 | METHOD, DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR GENERATING VIRTUAL IMAGE | March 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17673984 | GRAPH DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING DISPLAY CONTROL FUNCTION FOR CONVERTING TWO-DIMENSIONAL GRAPH TO THREE-DIMENSIONAL GRAPH AND DISPLAYING THREE-DIMENSIONAL GRAPH, AND CORRESPONDING GRAPH DISPLAY METHOD AND NONTRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM | February 2022 | August 2023 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17650214 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONFIGURING COLOR, DEVICE, MEDIUM AND PRODUCT | February 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17589496 | CHANGING LCD DISPLAY TIMING CONTROLLER SETTINGS FOR DIFFERENT GRAPHICS PROCESSOR REQUIREMENTS | January 2022 | November 2023 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17580383 | APPARATUS, A METHOD AND A COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR ROTATING DISPLAYED VISUAL INFORMATION | January 2022 | April 2024 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17646117 | METHOD FOR GENERATING VIRTUAL CHARACTER, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | December 2021 | February 2024 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17644291 | Methods and Systems for Rendering View-Dependent Images Using 2D Images | December 2021 | October 2023 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17644145 | CONVERTING BOREHOLE IMAGES INTO THREE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES FOR NUMERICAL MODELING AND SIMULATION APPLICATIONS | December 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17643893 | ENHANCED INTERACTIVE FEATURES FOR A VIDEO PRESENTATION SYSTEM | December 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 42 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17615148 | ELEMENT DATA MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, ELEMENT DATA MANAGEMENT METHOD, PROGRAM, AND DATA STRUCTURE OF ELEMENT DATA | November 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17534205 | PERSONAL SPACE BUBBLE IN VR ENVIRONMENTS | November 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17531277 | INFORMATION DISPLAYING METHOD AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM IN WHICH PROGRAM FOR EXECUTING INFORMATION DISPLAYING METHOD IS STORED | November 2021 | May 2024 | Abandon | 29 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17452598 | VISUALIZATION OF RELATIONSHIPS AMONG ORDER COMPONENTS | October 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17452568 | GENERATION OF STYLIZED DRAWING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHAPES USING NEURAL NETWORKS | October 2021 | September 2023 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17362908 | PER-PIXEL VARIABLE RATE SHADING CONTROLS USING STENCIL DATA | June 2021 | March 2024 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17357931 | Systems and methods for recolouring vector graphics | June 2021 | July 2023 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17321211 | Computationally-Efficient Generation of Simulations of Cloth-Like Materials Using Bilinear Element Models | May 2021 | October 2023 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17245763 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TIMELINE VISUALIZATION | April 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17235067 | Contrast Ratio Color Picker | April 2021 | September 2023 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17225107 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM | April 2021 | October 2023 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17204749 | LIGHT-RESAMPLING WITH SURFACE SIMILARITY TEST | March 2021 | March 2024 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17186593 | FACE POSE ESTIMATION/THREE-DIMENSIONAL FACE RECONSTRUCTION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | February 2021 | November 2023 | Allow | 33 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17256201 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GRAPHICS VIRTUALIZATION WITH LATE SYNCHRONIZATION | December 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16723866 | MULTIMODAL APPROACH FOR AVATAR ANIMATION | December 2019 | October 2023 | Abandon | 45 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16494356 | AR DISPLAY APPARATUS AND AR DISPLAY METHOD | September 2019 | September 2023 | Allow | 48 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 16040602 | DATA PLOT PROCESSING | July 2018 | April 2019 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15250270 | SYSTEMS, APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR IMAGE MESH WARPING | August 2016 | April 2018 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14830726 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING METHOD AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS THEREOF | August 2015 | August 2018 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14257129 | IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MODIFYING A DISPLAY TEXTURE OF AN IMAGE | April 2014 | January 2019 | Allow | 57 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 14015266 | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTING TRANSPARENCY OF DISPLAY USED FOR PACKAGING A PRODUCT | August 2013 | April 2016 | Allow | 32 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13550985 | Automatic Selection of Different Visualizations for the Organization of Multivariate Data | July 2012 | September 2017 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13264712 | CONVERGENT MATRIX FACTORIZATION BASED ENTIRE FRAME IMAGE PROCESSING | October 2011 | December 2015 | Allow | 50 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13154594 | AUTOMATIC SELECTION OF DIFFERENT VISUALIZATIONS FOR THE ORGANIZATION OF MULTIVARIATE DATA | June 2011 | July 2015 | Allow | 49 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13117698 | Rendering Transparent Primitives | May 2011 | November 2015 | Allow | 53 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12848351 | RESIZING OBJECTS IN REGIONS OF VIRTUAL UNIVERSES | August 2010 | December 2014 | Allow | 53 | 7 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner LE, SARAH.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 25.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner LE, SARAH works in Art Unit 2614 and has examined 52 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 78.8%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 31 months.
Examiner LE, SARAH's allowance rate of 78.8% places them in the 40% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by LE, SARAH receive 2.42 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 83% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LE, SARAH is 31 months. This places the examiner in the 36% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +28.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LE, SARAH. This interview benefit is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 30.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 51% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 4.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 44% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 25.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 21% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.