Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18690751 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM | March 2024 | March 2026 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18572388 | A METHOD FOR GENERATING A SHIMMER VIEW OF A PHYSICAL OBJECT | December 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18389319 | LIGHT NORMALIZATION IN COMBINED 3D USER REPRESENTATIONS | November 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18507740 | IMAGE HARMONIZATION FOR IMAGE STITCHING SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS | November 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18466729 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIA FOR 3D ASSET COMPILER | September 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18458032 | VIEWPOINTS DETERMINATION FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECTS | August 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18455510 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-GENERATED BACKGROUNDS | August 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18364982 | LEARNING DIRECTABLE VIRTUAL AGENTS THROUGH CONDITIONAL ADVERSARIAL LATENT MODELS | August 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18364783 | CROSS-ATTENTION DECODING FOR VOLUMETRIC RENDERING | August 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18355995 | PROGRESSIVELY GENERATING FINE POLYGON MESHES | July 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18215964 | Obfuscating 3D Representation Data for Privacy | June 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18212100 | BLOCKCHAIN-BASED DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND PROGRAM PRODUCT | June 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18201523 | STYLIZED IMAGE PAINTING | May 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18198172 | PICTURE GENERATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND MEDIUM | May 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18317156 | ANIMATION COMPOSITOR FOR DIGITAL AVATARS | May 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18317069 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMPUTER VISION-ASSISTED COLORIMETRIC TEST READING | May 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18036838 | LABELING DEVICE, LABELING METHOD, LABELING PROGRAM, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | May 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18251224 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTION METHOD, THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTION APPARATUS AND STORAGE MEDIUM | April 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18033695 | ORAL IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND ORAL IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD | April 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18128986 | Controllable Three-dimensional Object Generation | March 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18191799 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIA FOR DIGITAL PLACES | March 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18191174 | DISPLAY DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD OF DISPLAY DEVICE | March 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18126632 | AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING ELECTRONIC FILES BASED ON AGGREGATED INFORMATION FROM RECORDS | March 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18173920 | GLASSES-TYPE INFORMATION DISPLAY DEVICE, DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD, AND DISPLAY CONTROL PROGRAM | February 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18170661 | SEMANTIC GUIDANCE FOR 3D RECONSTRUCTION | February 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18167478 | Integration Framework for Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Elements in an Artificial Reality Environment | February 2023 | August 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18165779 | GENERATING AN AVATAR EXPRESSION | February 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18017748 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, 3D SYSTEMS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODS | January 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18153943 | METHODS FOR DISPLAYING, SELECTING AND MOVING OBJECTS AND CONTAINERS IN AN ENVIRONMENT | January 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18149993 | DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE SUPPORTING SAME | January 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18080089 | SPATIALLY DISENTANGLED GENERATIVE RADIANCE FIELDS FOR CONTROLLABLE 3D-AWARE SCENE SYNTHESIS | December 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18077434 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING FACE HARMONIZATION IMAGE | December 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18077438 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EQUIPMENT INSPECTION WITH A DIGITAL TWIN AND AUGMENTED REALITY | December 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18075884 | Displayed Image Transition | December 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18058294 | PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF AUGMENTED REALITY OBJECTS WITH PHYSICAL OBJECTS | November 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17986399 | TRANSFORMING NON-REALISTIC TO REALISTIC VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS | November 2022 | August 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17485399 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR RAY TRACING WITH SHADER CALL GRAPH ANALYSIS | September 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 44 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner CREARY, LATRELL ANTHONY works in Art Unit 2613 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 44 months.
Examiner CREARY, LATRELL ANTHONY's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by CREARY, LATRELL ANTHONY receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CREARY, LATRELL ANTHONY is 44 months. This places the examiner in the 14% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 18% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 23% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.