Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18408181 | High-Fidelity Micro-Doppler Effect Simulator | January 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18572888 | Method for calculating one or more isovists of a physical or extended reality environment | December 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18534725 | IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM, FOR HIGH-DEFINITION CREATION OF AN IMAGE ON A SCREEN | December 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18491993 | LUMINANCE-PRESERVING AND TEMPORALLY STABLE DALTONIZATION | October 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18378152 | IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD | October 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18483813 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MEDIA FOR GENERATING VISUALIZATION OF PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT IN ARTIFICIAL REALITY | October 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18553640 | AUTO SAFE ZONE DETECTION | October 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18473274 | NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | September 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18281995 | IDENTIFYING VARIATION IN SURGICAL APPROACHES | September 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18447019 | FEATURE EXTRACTION USING A POINT OF A COLLECTION OF POINTS | August 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18362295 | AUGMENTED REALITY-ASSISTED SERVICING OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ASSETS | July 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18322196 | SERVER APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND OPERATING METHOD OF SYSTEM | May 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18122793 | SURGICAL SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES EMPLOYING AUGMENTED REALITY (AR) FOR PLANNING | March 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17935665 | Systems and Methods for Defining, Bonding, and Editing Point Cloud Data Points with Primitives | September 2022 | March 2023 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17695902 | SINGLE IMAGE-BASED REAL-TIME BODY ANIMATION | March 2022 | March 2023 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17544658 | LAST-LEVEL PROJECTION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIRTUAL AND AUGMENTED REALITY | December 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17520614 | Integrated Sports Trading Card with Near Field Communication | November 2021 | October 2023 | Abandon | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17502520 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING A FLOOR PLAN | October 2021 | January 2023 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17449127 | HYBRID PHOTOGRAMMETRY | September 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17381936 | Method and Apparatus for Determining Experience Quality of VR Multimedia | July 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17352334 | DIRECTED IMAGE CAPTURE | June 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17351855 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING TILE-BASED PATH RENDERING | June 2021 | February 2023 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17340261 | STYLIZED IMAGE PAINTING | June 2021 | February 2023 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17240860 | 2.5D GRAPHICS RENDERING SYSTEM | April 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17239941 | Video-Bot based System and Method for Continually improving the Quality of Candidate Screening Process, Candidate Hiring Process and Internal Organizational Promotion Process, using Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning Technology and Statistical Inference based Automated Evaluation of responses that employs a scalable Cloud Architecture | April 2021 | July 2023 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17238023 | DISPLAY SYSTEM | April 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17211509 | USER INTERFACE FOR DISPLAYING POINT CLOUDS GENERATED BY A LIDAR DEVICE ON A UAV | March 2021 | February 2023 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17146702 | Systems And Methods Of Using Mixed Reality For Interacting With A Display System | January 2021 | February 2023 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16904996 | SMARTWEARABLES WITH EMBEDDED NFC (NEAR FIELD COMMUNICATION) AND VITAL HEALTH SENSORS WITH MOBILE/CLOUD DATA AND ULTRA VIOLET GERMICIDAL IRRADIATION (UVGI) TECHNOLOGIES | June 2020 | December 2022 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16747529 | Method, system for roadway intersection designs and computer program product | January 2020 | June 2023 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16511961 | TECHNIQUES FOR FEATURE-BASED NEURAL RENDERING | July 2019 | March 2023 | Allow | 44 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16225829 | ROAD SURFACE DETECTION | December 2018 | February 2023 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14326841 | Computer Graphics Processor and Method for Rendering a Three-Dimensional Image on a Display Screen | July 2014 | October 2015 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14064899 | TRAINING SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR DYNAMICALLY INJECTING EXPRESSION INFORMATION INTO AN ANIMATED FACIAL MESH | October 2013 | November 2014 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13869761 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SIMULATING THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL OF WORKPIECE | April 2013 | March 2015 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13808388 | IMAGE GENERATION APPARATUS AND IMAGE GENERATION METHOD | January 2013 | May 2015 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13617913 | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DISPLAYING 3D IMAGE AND DEVICE AND METHOD FOR RECEIVING 3D IMAGE BY USING LIGHT OF DIFFERENT WAVELENGTHS | September 2012 | March 2015 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13548867 | IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM FOR GENERATING MULTI-VIEWPOINT IMAGES | July 2012 | November 2014 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10875943 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BLENDING DATA SAMPLING TECHNIQUES | June 2004 | July 2006 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10465055 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING FACTORED APPROXIMATIONS FOR ARBITRARY BIDIRECTIONAL REFLECTANCE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS | June 2003 | January 2006 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10433315 | AUTOMATIC GENERATING DEVICE FOR 3-D STRUCTURE SHAPE, AUTOMATIC GENERATING METHOD, PROGRAM THEREFOR, AND RECORDING MEDIUM RECORDING THE PROGRAM | June 2003 | March 2006 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10204685 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR VOLUME PROCESSING AND RENDERING | January 2003 | June 2006 | Allow | 46 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BROOME, SAID A.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner BROOME, SAID A works in Art Unit 2612 and has examined 27 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 88.9%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 23 months.
Examiner BROOME, SAID A's allowance rate of 88.9% places them in the 70% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by BROOME, SAID A receive 1.52 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 27% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BROOME, SAID A is 23 months. This places the examiner in the 85% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +13.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BROOME, SAID A. This interview benefit is in the 50% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 16.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 66.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 9% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 100.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 7.4% of allowed cases (in the 90% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 23% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.