Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18821364 | METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR GENERATING CONTENT USING A DIFFUSION MODEL | August 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18766481 | INTERACTIVE GUI ELEMENTS FOR INDICATING OBJECTS TO SUPPLEMENT REQUESTS FOR GENERATIVE OUTPUT | July 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18564209 | IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD | November 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18515378 | GENERATIVE IMAGE FILLING USING A REFERENCE IMAGE | November 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18505009 | RELIGHTABLE NEURAL RADIANCE FIELD MODEL | November 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18491599 | Systems and Methods for 3D Facial Modeling | October 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18137293 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADJUSTING A USER POSITION IN VIRTUAL REALITY | April 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10677258 | DISPLAY AND DISPLAY PANEL DRIVING METHOD | October 2003 | March 2006 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 10402957 | TOUCH PANEL INTEGRATED TYPE DISPLAY APPARATUS | April 2003 | July 2006 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10387129 | ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND OPERATION DEVICE FOR OPERATING THE APPARATUS | March 2003 | July 2006 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 10321363 | POWER MODULE AND DISPLAY DEVICE | December 2002 | February 2006 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10288914 | APPARATUS FOR IMAGE PROJECTION | November 2002 | January 2006 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner GODDARD, TAMMY works in Art Unit 2611 and has examined 5 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 38 months.
Examiner GODDARD, TAMMY's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by GODDARD, TAMMY receive 1.60 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 30% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by GODDARD, TAMMY is 38 months. This places the examiner in the 30% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 40.0% of allowed cases (in the 100% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 23% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.