USPTO Examiner AHMAD NAUMAN UDDIN - Art Unit 2611

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18414428System and Method for Creating a Design Tool Using a Clockwise Fill RuleJanuary 2024February 2026Allow2510YesNo
18567263METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RENDERING TRANSPARENT POLYHEDRONDecember 2023December 2025Allow2410YesNo
18527750AVERAGE RATE REGULATOR FOR PARALLEL ADAPTIVE SAMPLERDecember 2023September 2025Allow2210NoNo
18554487INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODOctober 2023January 2026Abandon2810NoNo
18285934DIFFERENTIABLE FACIAL INTERNALS MESHING MODELOctober 2023October 2025Allow2510YesNo
18473814BLENDING ELEVATION DATA INTO A SEAMLESS HEIGHTFIELDSeptember 2023November 2025Allow2620YesNo
18466143METHOD AND DEVICE WITH IMAGE GENERATION BASED ON NEURAL SCENE REPRESENTATIONSeptember 2023March 2026Allow3020YesNo
18279751Rendering an Immersive ExperienceSeptember 2023December 2025Abandon2710NoNo
18240739METHOD FOR PROCESSING EMOJI MESSAGE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND MEDIUMAugust 2023November 2025Abandon2710NoNo
18450779CONTENT DISPLAY CONTROL DEVICE, CONTENT DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING CONTENT DISPLAY CONTROL PROGRAMAugust 2023September 2025Allow2510YesNo
18447963VIRTUAL REPRESENTATIVE CONDITIONING SYSTEMAugust 2023September 2025Allow2510YesNo
18353288INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMJuly 2023August 2025Allow2510NoNo
18326887ROLLING VIDEO BUFFER APPARATUSMay 2023January 2026Allow3220NoNo
18318724METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RECONSTRUCTING THREE-DIMENSIONAL, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUMMay 2023October 2025Abandon2910NoNo
18252979IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, MODEL TRAINING METHOD, APPARATUS, MEDIUM AND DEVICEMay 2023October 2025Allow2920NoNo
18251995DEFORMABLE NEURAL RADIANCE FIELDSMay 2023October 2025Allow2920YesNo
18144005PROP PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON LIVE ROOMMay 2023July 2025Allow2610NoNo
18142785Photographing Method, and Electronic Device and Non-Transitory Readable Storage MediumMay 2023June 2025Allow2510NoNo
18136033Method and apparatus for multiple dimension image creationApril 2023July 2025Abandon2710NoNo
18134270METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR COMPRESSING DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL DATAApril 2023September 2025Allow2920YesNo
18299943INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODApril 2023February 2026Allow3410YesNo
18127487TEMPORAL PREDICTION BASED VERTEX POSITION COMPRESSIONMarch 2023May 2025Allow2610YesNo
18089984UNSUPERVISED VOLUMETRIC ANIMATIONDecember 2022April 2025Allow2810NoNo
18069472Computer Systems and Methods for Rendering Three-Dimensional Views Using Object Cache BufferingDecember 2022March 2025Allow2710YesNo
18067587COMFORTABLE MULTIPLEXED LIGHTING FOR MODELING RELIGHTABLE AVATARSDecember 2022April 2025Allow2810YesNo
18051648RECONSTRUCTING GENERAL RADIAL GRADIENTSNovember 2022February 2025Allow2710NoNo
17959982GENERATING AND INTERPOSING INTERPOLATED FRAMES WITH APPLICATION FRAMES FOR DISPLAYOctober 2022January 2026Allow3940YesNo
17940363VISUAL RECOGNITION SYSTEM AND VISUAL RECOGNITION METHODSeptember 2022January 2026Abandon4020NoNo
17823574RECONSTRUCTING CONCENTRIC RADIAL GRADIENTSAugust 2022March 2025Allow3010YesNo
17754729DISPLAY SCREEN ADJUSTMENT METHOD, STORAGE MEDIUM AND TERMINAL DEVICEApril 2022May 2025Allow3810NoNo
17485017DYNAMIC TILE SEQUENCING IN GRAPHIC PROCESSINGSeptember 2021July 2025Allow4520NoNo
17484619OUT-OF-ORDER EXECUTION OF GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNIT TEXTURE SAMPLER OPERATIONSSeptember 2021July 2025Allow4520NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner AHMAD, NAUMAN UDDIN - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner AHMAD, NAUMAN UDDIN works in Art Unit 2611 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 45 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner AHMAD, NAUMAN UDDIN's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by AHMAD, NAUMAN UDDIN receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by AHMAD, NAUMAN UDDIN is 45 months. This places the examiner in the 12% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 17% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 23% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.