USPTO Examiner ZHENG BIN QING - Art Unit 2499

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18948632MOBILE SECURITY FILE LEAKAGE DETECTION METHOD AND SYSTEMNovember 2024September 2025Abandon1010NoNo
18541608Identifying Security-Relevant Commits Through Architectural ContextDecember 2023January 2026Allow2510YesNo
18507363INTERFACE INVOCATION REQUEST PROCESSING METHODS AND APPARATUSESNovember 2023October 2025Allow2310YesNo
18371759METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING RECORDING MEDIUM AND COMPUTER PROGRAMSeptember 2023August 2025Allow2320NoNo
18305701VISUALIZATION OF SECURITY VULNERABILITIESApril 2023November 2025Allow3020YesNo
18299216MEMORY PROTECTIONApril 2023February 2026Allow3510YesNo
18132061CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM STORING CYBER THREAT INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAMApril 2023October 2025Allow3120YesNo
18295107AUTHENTICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SATELLITE NAVIGATION MESSAGE AND CORRECTION MESSAGESApril 2023February 2026Allow3410YesNo
18156708QUANTUM RESISTANT ENCRYPTION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE THEREOFJanuary 2023November 2025Abandon3420NoNo
18082154CONTROL METHOD AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUSDecember 2022March 2025Abandon2710NoNo
18064471SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTHENTICATIONDecember 2022November 2025Allow3530YesNo
18009700METHOD AND DEVICE FOR REGISTERING BIOMETRIC FEATUREDecember 2022October 2025Abandon3420NoNo
18007761DOCUMENT REDACTED PART DISPLAYING SYSTEM, DOCUMENT REDACTED PART DISPLAYING METHOD, AND PROGRAMDecember 2022July 2025Abandon3220NoNo
18007794METHOD FOR SECURING COMMUNICATIONDecember 2022June 2025Allow3130YesNo
18000639INFORMATION SECURITY PROTECTION METHOD AND APPARATUSDecember 2022June 2025Allow3110NoNo
18060759TECHNIQUES FOR FORENSIC TRACING OF SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY FROM CLOUD COMPUTING LOGSDecember 2022January 2026Allow3730YesNo
17994949DATA BACKUP AND RECOVERY SYSTEMNovember 2022June 2025Allow3110YesNo
17980500MOBILE EDGE COMPUTING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CONSTRUCTING TRAFFIC DATA FEATURE SET USING THE SAMENovember 2022March 2025Abandon2810NoNo
17974629SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVING MEMBERSHIP OF SUBSET FROM GIVEN SET AND LINEAR OPERATION THEREFOROctober 2022May 2025Allow3110NoNo
17972655SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DETECTING ABNORMAL ACT THREATENING TO SECURITY BASED ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEOctober 2022June 2025Allow3220YesNo
17918643AUTHENTICATED ENCRYPTION APPARATUS, AUTHENTICATED DECRYPTION APPARATUS, AUTHENTICATED ENCRYPTION SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMOctober 2022January 2026Abandon3920YesNo
17961275PASSWORD AUTHENTICATION APPARATUS, PASSWORD AUTHENTICATION METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMOctober 2022February 2025Abandon2810NoNo
17916883APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR POLICY-BASED AUTOMATED EXCEPTION HANDLINGOctober 2022August 2025Allow3520YesNo
17958004SECURE HASHING OF LARGE DATA FILES TO VERIFY FILE IDENTITYSeptember 2022March 2025Allow3010YesNo
17929040METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR POLICY ATTRIBUTES EXCHANGE BETWEEN SECURITY POLICY MANAGEMENT PLATFORMS AND 5G AS A SERVICE PLATFORMSSeptember 2022March 2025Allow3020YesNo
17785978DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND DATA TRANSMISSION DEVICEJune 2022June 2025Allow3620YesNo
17839718SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING AND DISTRIBUTING WEB FORM FOR COLLECTING DATAJune 2022November 2025Abandon4120NoNo
17784773Device and Method for Digital Utilization of Certificate Data, and Program ThereforJune 2022May 2025Abandon3520NoNo
17839066RECURSIVE CRYPTOGRAPHY PROTOCOLJune 2022December 2024Allow3010YesNo
17838350MONITORING SYSTEMS AND METHODSJune 2022June 2025Abandon3620YesNo
17784734AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUMJune 2022October 2024Allow2810NoNo
17835853HEARING DEVICE WITH CERTIFICATES AND RELATED METHODSJune 2022October 2024Allow2810NoNo
17140224SOFT-SENSOR TO MEASURE PH OF TREATED SEAWATERJanuary 2021November 2024Allow4720YesNo
17124238RESOURCE AWARE NEURAL NETWORK MODEL DYNAMIC UPDATINGDecember 2020December 2024Abandon4820NoNo
17124270TRAINING OF PREDICTIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODELS ACCEPTABILITY AND VALUE FEEDBACK LOOPDecember 2020September 2024Allow4520YesNo
17056985RANKING OF BUSINESS OBJECTNovember 2020October 2024Abandon4710NoNo
16963603A METHOD FOR COLLABORATIVE MACHINE LEARNING OF ANALYTICAL MODELSJuly 2020March 2025Abandon5620NoNo
16759561MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS WITH MEMORY BASED PARAMETER ADAPTATION FOR LEARNING FAST AND SLOWERApril 2020October 2024Allow5410YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner ZHENG, BIN QING - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner ZHENG, BIN QING works in Art Unit 2499 and has examined 6 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 50.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner ZHENG, BIN QING's allowance rate of 50.0% places them in the 12% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by ZHENG, BIN QING receive 1.67 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 34% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ZHENG, BIN QING is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +100.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ZHENG, BIN QING. This interview benefit is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 49% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 17% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 23% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.