Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18678569 | MANAGING INFERENCE MODELS IN VIEW OF RECONSTRUCTABILITY OF SENSITIVE INFORMATION | May 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18321627 | COLLABORATIVE SOFTWARE APPLICATION STATIC VULNERABILITY DETECTION | May 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18131757 | SYSTEM FOR COMPONENT-LEVEL THREAT ASSESSMENT IN A COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT | April 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18081710 | ELECTRONIC SYSTEM AND SECURITY AUTHORITY DELEGATION METHOD THEREOF | December 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18064536 | Method and System for Secure Interoperability between Medical Devices | December 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18061294 | SECURE AND EFFICIENT DISTRIBUTION OF SMART CONTRACT APPLICATION BINARY INTERFACES AND ADDRESSES | December 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17975246 | System and platform for enabling personal health data ownership | October 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 49 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18048346 | Systems and Methods for Protecting Against Token-Based Malicious Scripts | October 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17966807 | PREVENT NETWORK SPREAD OF MALWARE BY RESTRICTING IT TO ONE PATIENT ONLY | October 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18046381 | COORDINATING DATA ACCESS AMONG MULTIPLE SERVICES | October 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17937406 | SECURE PROVISIONING AND ROTATION OF CERTIFICATES FOR EDGE DEVICES | September 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17951448 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING MALICIOUS EVENTS | September 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17821285 | CIRCUIT AND METHOD FOR DETECTING A FAULT INJECTION ATTACK IN AN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT | August 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17820644 | Notification Prompt Method, Server, and Storage Medium | August 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17883783 | METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY ACCESSING WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK BY INTERNET OF THINGS DEVICE, AND APPARATUS | August 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17878955 | Data exchange protection and governance system | August 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17878968 | Cryptography-as-a-Service | August 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17783686 | METHOD FOR SECURE EXECUTING OF A SECURITY RELATED PROCESS | June 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17736417 | DETECTING BACKDOORS IN BINARY SOFTWARE CODE | May 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 41 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17727759 | ORGANIZATION-LEVEL RANSOMWARE INCRIMINATION | April 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17716224 | ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD OF THREAT DETECTION IN A COMPUTER OR COMPUTER NETWORK | April 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17706329 | CONSENSUS AUTHENTICATION UTILIZING NODES IN A DISTRIBUTED NETWORK OF NODES | March 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17694725 | Secure remote reset | March 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17691413 | INCIDENT RESPONSE ACCORDING TO RISK SCORE | March 2022 | June 2024 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17681832 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING ANOMALIES OF AN INFRASTRUCTURE IN A NETWORK | February 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 46 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17649604 | TECHNIQUES FOR PROVIDING COMPUTER-MEDIATED REALITY CONTENT AS DIGITAL MULTIMEDIA EXPERIENCES VIA WEBPAGE NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENS | February 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 48 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17389704 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AGGREGATING AND SECURING MANAGED DETECTION AND RESPONSE CONNECTION INTERFACES BETWEEN MULTIPLE NETWORKED SOURCES | July 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner BAZNA, JUDY works in Art Unit 2495 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 47 months.
Examiner BAZNA, JUDY's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by BAZNA, JUDY receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BAZNA, JUDY is 47 months. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 17% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 23% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.