USPTO Examiner CHOLLETI RAGHAVENDER NMN - Art Unit 2492

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18617953DETECTION OF SUSPICIOUS OBJECTS IN CUSTOMER PREMISES EQUIPMENT (CPE)March 2024December 2025Abandon2020NoNo
18144450CONFIGURATION-AWARE FUNCTIONALITY ENABLEMENT IN INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTMay 2023February 2026Allow3420NoNo
18142698METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR FACILITATING APPLICATION VULNERABILITY DRIFT ANALYTICSMay 2023February 2026Allow3320YesNo
18034844SCALABLE SOURCE CODE VULNERABILITY REMEDIATIONMay 2023January 2026Allow3320NoNo
18120446RESPONSE SUPPORT DEVICE AND RESPONSE SUPPORT METHODMarch 2023September 2025Abandon3010NoNo
18120160METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING ANOMALOUS BEHAVIOR IN STREAM DATAMarch 2023November 2025Allow3220NoNo
18020863DIGITAL SIGNATURESFebruary 2023August 2025Abandon3010NoNo
18099167METHOD FOR PROTECTING AGAINST THE THEFT OF MACHINE LEARNING MODULES, AND PROTECTION SYSTEMJanuary 2023June 2025Abandon2910NoNo
18077493REDUCING RESOURCE CONSUMPTION FOR CROSS-TENANT KERNEL SERVICESDecember 2022October 2025Allow3420YesNo
18055900AUTOMATED CONTAINER SECURITYNovember 2022August 2025Allow3320YesNo
17969693SYSTEM-LEVEL AUTHENTICATION CREDENTIALS TO PERFORM DATA CENTER OPERATIONSOctober 2022June 2025Abandon3210NoNo
17917610Managing Sidelink Communication SecurityOctober 2022July 2025Abandon3420NoNo
17960013ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING VEHICLE BASED ON DRIVER AUTHENTICATIONOctober 2022December 2025Allow3830YesNo
17957904AUTOMATED POLICY REFINER FOR CLOUD-BASED IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMSSeptember 2022February 2025Allow2920YesNo
17945625ANOMALOUS COMMAND LINE ENTRY DETECTIONSeptember 2022August 2025Allow3520YesNo
17931507SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USER CONTROL AND EXCLUSION OF CRYPTOGRAPHIC TOKENIZED DATASeptember 2022April 2025Allow3220YesNo
17929619INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMSeptember 2022March 2025Allow3120NoNo
17821493Aggregate Event Profiles for Detecting Malicious Mobile ApplicationsAugust 2022March 2026Allow4340NoNo
17786945Authentication Method, Medium, and Electronic DeviceJune 2022March 2026Allow4530NoNo
17709094AGENT-BASED ESTABLISHMENT OF SECURE CONNECTION BETWEEN ENDPOINTS AND CLOUD SERVERSMarch 2022September 2025Allow4230NoNo
17703298METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING RISK WITHIN A NETWORKMarch 2022December 2025Abandon4420YesNo
17697746COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMMarch 2022March 2026Abandon4840NoNo
17525604APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETECTING VULNERABILITY TO NONVOLATILE MEMORY ATTACKNovember 2021June 2025Abandon4320NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner CHOLLETI, RAGHAVENDER NMN - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner CHOLLETI, RAGHAVENDER NMN works in Art Unit 2492 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 0.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 43 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner CHOLLETI, RAGHAVENDER NMN's allowance rate of 0.0% places them in the 0% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by CHOLLETI, RAGHAVENDER NMN receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CHOLLETI, RAGHAVENDER NMN is 43 months. This places the examiner in the 16% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 17% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.