USPTO Examiner SRIRAM ADITYA - Art Unit 2491

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18444428VISUAL AND AUDIO OUTPUT AUTHENTICATION IN AVATAR SYSTEMSFebruary 2024January 2026Allow2310YesNo
18540905METHOD OF CONTRACTING RESERVES USING PEDERSEN COMMITMENT AND METHOD OF PROVING RESERVES USING ZERO-KNOWLEDGE PROOF ALGORITHM BASED ON PEDERSEN COMMITMENTDecember 2023March 2026Allow2711YesNo
18529880Composite Voice-Based AuthenticationDecember 2023January 2026Abandon2610NoNo
18500985METHOD FOR MANAGING DOCUMENT TO BE CLEANED BASED ON METADATA OF SECURE DOCUMENT, APPARATUS FOR THE SAME, COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR THE SAME, AND RECORDING MEDIUM STORING COMPUTER PROGRAM THEREOFNovember 2023March 2026Abandon2820NoNo
18368085Digital Watermarking for Automated Vishing PreventionSeptember 2023November 2025Allow2620NoNo
18240680System and Method for Validating a Digital Item Token on a Simulated User DeviceAugust 2023May 2025Allow2020YesNo
18363877IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS CAPABLE OF CONTROLLING DISPLAY UNIT AND IMAGE FORMING UNIT BASED ON LICENSE STATE, AND CONTROL METHOD FOR THE IMAGE FORMING APPARATUSAugust 2023December 2025Allow2911NoNo
18248387INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMApril 2023March 2026Abandon3520NoNo
18132400Biograb (Biodigitalization and BioBlockchainAdaptation)April 2023March 2026Abandon3510YesNo
18192726DATA PRIVACY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHODMarch 2023January 2026Allow3420YesNo
18246822Method, Apparatus and Device for Constructing Token for Cloud Platform Resource Access ControlMarch 2023August 2025Allow2920NoNo
18122002NON-FUNGIBLE TOKEN (NFT) PRESENTATION SYSTEMMarch 2023September 2025Abandon3001NoNo
18118222Method and System for Decommissioning Cloud-Connected PrintersMarch 2023March 2026Allow3620NoNo
18022518COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND PROGRAMFebruary 2023October 2025Allow3220YesNo
18162736SERVER AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM FOR COMMUNICATION SYSTEMFebruary 2023September 2025Allow3220YesNo
18155846MONITORING EXECUTION OF ACTIONS IN COMPUTER NETWORK ENVIRONMENTSJanuary 2023December 2025Allow3530YesNo
18148004INTERNET-OF-THINGS DEVICES AND METHODS OF CONTROLLING POWER THERETODecember 2022July 2025Allow3120NoNo
18003884METHOD FOR COLLABORATIVE MANAGEMENT OF LICENSES ACROSS INDUSTRIAL SECTORSDecember 2022December 2025Allow3620YesNo
18066089TRANSPARENT AND ADAPTIVE LEARNING ANTI-PIRACY SERVICE FOR MEDIA FILESDecember 2022August 2025Allow3230YesNo
18078038Case Tampering Detection Device and Method for Computer SystemDecember 2022March 2026Abandon3940NoNo
18062038SECURITY TECHNIQUE FOR DIGITAL DATA ON DIGITAL STORAGE MEDIUMDecember 2022October 2025Allow3440YesYes
18076312WAN OPTIMIZATION FOR ENCRYPTED DATA TRAFFICDecember 2022June 2025Abandon3010NoNo
18072444PROCESSOR ARCHITECTURE AND RELATED TECHNIQUESNovember 2022August 2025Allow3330NoNo
17994246DATA SECURITYNovember 2022October 2025Allow3530NoNo
17984108Method to Validate Application Programming Interface (API) leveraging Non fungible Token (NFT)November 2022February 2026Allow4030YesNo
17981386EXTRACTED FIELD GENERATION TO FILTER LOG MESSAGESNovember 2022June 2025Abandon3110NoNo
17973797DYNAMIC TRANSITIONING AMONG DEVICE SECURITY STATES BASED ON SERVER AVAILABILITYOctober 2022February 2026Allow4040YesNo
17967375SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR RESPONSIVELY AUGMENTING A RISK ENGINE TO ADDRESS NOVEL RISK PATTERNSOctober 2022December 2025Abandon3721NoNo
17956227IDENTITY SHARDED CACHE FOR THE DATA PLANE DATASeptember 2022December 2025Allow3930YesNo
17878313MALICIOUS ATTACK PROTECTION CIRCUIT, SYSTEM-ON-CHIP INCLUDING THE SAME, AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOFAugust 2022November 2025Allow4020YesNo
17876218CYBERSECURITY RISK ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION TOOLJuly 2022September 2025Allow3830YesNo
17867767RANDOM PASSWORD GENERATIONJuly 2022February 2025Abandon3110NoNo
17860582LOGGING AND CONTROLLING COMMUNICATIONS USING UNIVERSAL REFERENCES FOR HARDWARE AND/OR SOFTWARE CONFIGURATIONSJuly 2022January 2026Abandon4240YesNo
17845898CONFIDENTIAL COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT FOR SERVICE MESH ON A NETWORK INTERFACE DEVICEJune 2022August 2025Abandon3820YesNo
17527094DISPLAY CASE WITH TRANSPARENT DISPLAY FOR WATERMARKINGNovember 2021July 2025Allow4420YesNo
17454295COLLABORATIVE DIGITAL BOARDNovember 2021January 2026Allow5030YesNo
17485370MEMORY ASSISTED INCLINE ENCRYPTION/DECRYPTIONSeptember 2021July 2025Allow4610NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner SRIRAM, ADITYA - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SRIRAM, ADITYA works in Art Unit 2491 and has examined 3 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 46 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SRIRAM, ADITYA's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SRIRAM, ADITYA receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SRIRAM, ADITYA is 46 months. This places the examiner in the 11% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SRIRAM, ADITYA. This interview benefit is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 17% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 22% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.