Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18658566 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTONOMOUSLY POSITIONING A CAMERA OF A SEWER INSPECTION AND/OR MAINTENANCE SYSTEM | May 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17980259 | ENCODING METHOD BASED ON ENCODING ORDER CHANGE AND DEVICE THEREFOR, AND DECODING METHOD BASED ON ENCODING ORDER CHANGE AND DEVICE THPREFOR | November 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17958221 | IMAGE DECODING DEVICE, IMAGE DECODING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | September 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17956444 | REDUCING BLOCKINESS FOR CODECS | September 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17931676 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PERFORMING COMBINED INTER AND INTRA PREDICTION | September 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17847127 | ENCODER, DECODER AND CORRESPONDING METHODS OF CODING BLOCK PARTITIONING RESTRICTIONS DERIVATION | June 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17781497 | Video Encoding or Decoding Methods and Apparatuses with Scaling Ratio Constraint | June 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17504123 | DETERMINING RELATIVE POSITION AND ORIENTATION OF CAMERAS USING HARDWARE | October 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17436989 | IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND DEVICE, AND RECORDING MEDIUM STORING BITSTREAM | September 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17423125 | IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD | July 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17234523 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CORRELATING AN IMAGE CAPTURING DEVICE TO A HUMAN USER FOR ANALYZING GAZE INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE | April 2021 | December 2022 | Abandon | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17233633 | DISPLAY BANDWIDTH REDUCTION WITH MULTIPLE RESOLUTIONS | April 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16111887 | DETECTION DEVICE, ROAD SURFACE INFORMATION SYSTEM, AND VEHICLE | August 2018 | January 2023 | Abandon | 53 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15803849 | Wearable Device Capable of Recognizing Human Face and License Plate | November 2017 | July 2019 | Abandon | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15497599 | EVENT RECONSTRUCT THROUGH IMAGE REPORTING | April 2017 | July 2019 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14788416 | COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT SAMPLE ADAPTIVE OFFSET FILTERING DURING VIDEO ENCODING | June 2015 | January 2019 | Abandon | 43 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 14556887 | VIDEO PROCESSING SYSTEM WITH COLOR-BASED RECOGNITION AND METHODS FOR USE THEREWITH | December 2014 | June 2017 | Abandon | 30 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14369761 | DISPLAY DEVICE AND TELEVISION DEVICE | June 2014 | March 2017 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14180936 | Exterior Mirror Blind Spot Warning Display and Video Camera | February 2014 | February 2017 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13642454 | IMAGE-TRANSMITTING APPARATUS HAVING A SECURITY FUNCTION | October 2012 | October 2016 | Abandon | 48 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner ATALA, JAMIE JO works in Art Unit 2486 and has examined 19 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 0.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 33 months.
Examiner ATALA, JAMIE JO's allowance rate of 0.0% places them in the 0% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by ATALA, JAMIE JO receive 2.84 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 93% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ATALA, JAMIE JO is 33 months. This places the examiner in the 28% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ATALA, JAMIE JO. This interview benefit is in the 11% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 15% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.