USPTO Examiner BECKER JOSEPH W - Art Unit 2483

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18615671VIDEO CODING WITH GUIDED SEPARATE POST-PROCESSING STEPSMarch 2024October 2025Allow1900NoNo
18443186Method of Coding and Decoding Images, Coding and Decoding Device and Computer Programs Corresponding TheretoFebruary 2024September 2025Allow1900NoNo
18423311IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING EFFICIENT DEBLOCKINGJanuary 2024August 2025Allow1810NoNo
18407985ADAPTIVE LOOP FILTER-BASED VIDEO OR IMAGE CODINGJanuary 2024March 2025Allow1500NoNo
18405242TEMPORAL MOTION VECTOR PREDICTIONJanuary 2024March 2026Allow2610NoNo
18403639POST-FILTERING FOR WEIGHTED ANGULAR PREDICTIONJanuary 2024September 2025Allow2120YesNo
18573642DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CODING VIDEO DATADecember 2023March 2026Allow2610NoNo
18545219IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUSDecember 2023March 2025Allow1510NoNo
18543377SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING MOTION COMPENSATION FOR BI-PREDICTION IN VIDEO CODINGDecember 2023September 2025Allow2120NoNo
18532808EXTENDED LOW-FREQUENCY NON-SEPARABLE TRANSFORM (LFNST) DESIGNS WITH WORST-CASE COMPLEXITY HANDLINGDecember 2023December 2025Allow2410NoNo
18529337METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SELECTIVELY BREAKING PREDICTION IN VIDEO CODINGDecember 2023March 2025Allow1510NoNo
18523025Reference Picture ResamplingNovember 2023January 2025Allow1410NoNo
18515843DECODING DEVICE OF FILTERING RECONSTRUCTED VIDEO DATANovember 2023October 2024Allow1010NoNo
18503941ENCODER, DECODER, ENCODING METHOD, AND DECODING METHODNovember 2023September 2024Allow1110NoNo
18481800VIDEO CODING WITH GUIDED SEPARATE POST-PROCESSING STEPSOctober 2023December 2023Allow200NoNo
18477292CONCEPT FOR ENHANCING PARALLEL CODING CAPABILITIESSeptember 2023February 2026Allow2810NoNo
18368848METHOD FOR ACCESS UNIT DELIMITER SIGNALINGSeptember 2023September 2024Allow1210YesNo
18237068CODING UNIT QUANTIZATION PARAMETERS IN VIDEO CODINGAugust 2023October 2024Allow1410NoNo
18228037SIMPLIFIED BINARY ARITHMETIC CODING ENGINEJuly 2023October 2024Allow1410NoNo
18356201MULTI-VIEW DISPLAY DEVICEJuly 2023October 2025Allow2710NoNo
18329415PADDING PROCESS AT UNAVAILABLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS IN ADAPTIVE LOOP FILTERINGJune 2023October 2024Allow1710NoNo
18322428USING QUANTIZATION GROUPS IN VIDEO CODINGMay 2023October 2024Allow1710NoNo
18137457INDUSTRIAL CAMERAApril 2023October 2024Allow1800NoNo
18136231DOORBELL COMMUNITIESApril 2023February 2025Allow2211NoNo
18249423CELL IMAGING SYSTEMS AND METHODSApril 2023November 2025Abandon3110NoNo
18301737VIDEO ENCODING SYSTEMApril 2023March 2024Allow1110NoNo
18295732IMAGE PROJECTION METHOD FOR VIRTUAL TOURApril 2023January 2026Allow3421NoNo
18192188INTRAOCULAR SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING DATA AND POWER OPTICALLY TO AN IMPLANTMarch 2023July 2025Allow2810NoNo
18123997DISPLAY TERMINAL, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, METHOD FOR DISPLAYING, METHOD FOR COMMUNICATING, AND RECORDING MEDIUMMarch 2023November 2025Abandon3220NoNo
18025983IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHODMarch 2023March 2025Allow2410NoNo
18117252POST-FILTERING FOR WEIGHTED ANGULAR PREDICTIONMarch 2023September 2023Allow700NoNo
18177297Method and Apparatus of Matrix-Based Intra Prediction for Video CodingMarch 2023October 2023Allow700YesNo
18175759CONFIGURATION OF OPTICAL SENSOR DEVICES IN VEHICLES BASED ON THERMAL DATAFebruary 2023November 2025Allow3340YesNo
18173306TRANSFORM BLOCK SIZE RESTRICTION IN VIDEO CODINGFebruary 2023August 2025Allow3030YesNo
18172188Systems and Methods for Encoding Alternative Streams of Video for Use in Adaptive Bitrate StreamingFebruary 2023December 2025Allow3420NoNo
18103570VIDEO ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND DEVICE, AND RECORDING MEDIUM STORING BIT STREAMJanuary 2023March 2024Allow1310NoNo
18155216SAMPLE PADDING IN ADAPTIVE LOOP FILTERINGJanuary 2023March 2024Allow1310YesNo
18095479DOORBELL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND METHODSJanuary 2023August 2024Allow1911NoNo
18074887REFERENCE PICTURE RESAMPLINGDecember 2022December 2024Abandon2430YesNo
17994591ENCODER, DECODER, ENCODING METHOD, AND DECODING METHODNovember 2022December 2023Allow1310NoNo
17994092RESTRICTIONS ON IN-LOOP FILTERINGNovember 2022March 2026Allow4040YesNo
17990247NUMBER RESTRICTION FOR SUBLAYERSNovember 2022October 2024Allow2340YesNo
17970407TEMPLATE-MATCHING BASED ADAPTIVE MOTION VECTOR RESOLUTION BY USING AN ADAPTIVE ORDER OF MOTION VECTOR RESOLUTIONSOctober 2022January 2026Allow3930YesNo
17969633SELECTING A CODING METHOD FOR SUFFIX VALUES FOR DISPLACEMENT VECTOR DIFFERENCES BASED ON VALUE INTERVALSOctober 2022July 2025Allow3320YesNo
17961160ADAPTIVE LOOP FILTER-BASED VIDEO OR IMAGE CODINGOctober 2022November 2023Allow1310NoNo
17959479METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR SIGNALING OF SYNTAX ELEMENTS IN VIDEO CODINGOctober 2022November 2024Allow2510NoNo
17937938CAMERA MODULE FOR VEHICLEOctober 2022May 2024Allow1920NoNo
17896382IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUSAugust 2022October 2023Allow1310NoNo
17819362Method and Apparatus for Non-Linear Adaptive Loop Filtering in Video CodingAugust 2022October 2023Allow1410NoNo
17880799IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS USING NEURAL NETWORK BASED DEBLOCKING FILTERINGAugust 2022January 2025Allow2910NoNo
17760017A METHOD, AN APPARATUS AND A COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR VIDEO ENCODING AND VIDEO DECODINGAugust 2022May 2024Allow2110NoNo
17875382LOW COMPLEXITY LARGE TRANSFORMJuly 2022December 2023Allow1710NoNo
17792205ENCODING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND DEVICES THEREFORJuly 2022February 2024Allow1900NoNo
17858700MOTION VECTOR RANGE DERIVATION FOR ENHANCED INTERPOLATION FILTERJuly 2022April 2024Allow2100NoNo
17853274SIGNALED ADAPTIVE LOOP FILTER WITH MULTIPLE CLASSIFIERS IN VIDEO CODINGJune 2022October 2024Allow2710NoNo
17848385PHOTOGRAPHING METHOD IN LONG-FOCUS SCENARIO AND TERMINALJune 2022September 2024Allow2610NoNo
17787267DECODER, ENCODER AND METHODS FOR MIXING NAL UNITS OF DIFFERENT NAL UNIT TYPES IN VIDEO STREAMSJune 2022February 2025Allow3211NoNo
17843015METHOD AND APPARATUS OF POSITION DEPENDENT PREDICTION COMBINATION FOR OBLIQUE DIRECTIONAL INTRA PREDICTIONJune 2022March 2025Allow3320NoNo
17843549PROCESSING OF VIDEO OPERATIONS AS SUBTASKS FOR VIDEO FRAGMENTSJune 2022March 2025Allow3311YesNo
17842995TRANSFORMATION METHOD, ENCODER, DECODER, AND STORAGE MEDIUMJune 2022September 2024Allow2710NoNo
17787234VIDEO DATA STREAM, VIDEO ENCODER, APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR A HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCE DECODER AND FOR OUTPUT LAYER SETSJune 2022March 2024Allow2100NoNo
17835647USING QUANTIZATION GROUPS IN VIDEO CODINGJune 2022January 2023Allow710NoNo
17727791IMAGE AND VIDEO DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND SYSTEMApril 2022October 2025Allow4230NoNo
17716380PADDING PROCESS AT UNAVAILABLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS IN ADAPTIVE LOOP FILTERINGApril 2022February 2023Allow1120NoNo
17275824VIDEO DECODING METHOD AND DEVICE, AND VIDEO ENCODING METHOD AND DEVICEApril 2022March 2025Abandon4811YesNo
17714318ENCODER, A DECODER AND CORRESPONDING METHODSApril 2022January 2026Allow4630YesNo
17711959SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING PLACEMENT OF LABWARE COMPONENTSApril 2022October 2024Allow3020NoNo
17701303SELECTIVE APPLICATION OF SAMPLE PADDING IN ADAPTIVE LOOP FILTERINGMarch 2022October 2022Allow710NoNo
17701444ELECTRONIC DEVICE, CONTROL METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME, AND RECORDING MEDIUMMarch 2022September 2025Allow4231NoNo
17694008QUANTIZATION PARAMETER OFFSET FOR CHROMA DEBLOCKING FILTERINGMarch 2022September 2023Allow1930YesNo
17434657APPARATUSES FOR ENCODING AND DECODING IMAGE, AND METHODS FOR ENCODING AND DECODING IMAGE THEREBYMarch 2022June 2025Allow4530YesNo
17678253AFFINE MOTION MODEL RESTRICTIONS FOR MEMORY BANDWIDTH REDUCTION OF ENHANCED INTERPOLATION FILTERFebruary 2022July 2025Allow4140YesNo
17677400TECHNOLOGY TO ACCELERATE SCENE CHANGE DETECTION AND ACHIEVE ADAPTIVE CONTENT DISPLAYFebruary 2022August 2024Allow3020YesNo
17586116IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING EFFICIENT DEBLOCKINGJanuary 2022October 2023Allow2000NoNo
17585458METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIDEO CODINGJanuary 2022December 2023Allow2310NoNo
17572833TRANSFORM BLOCK SIZE RESTRICTION IN VIDEO CODINGJanuary 2022November 2022Allow1020NoNo
17570783SAMPLE PADDING IN ADAPTIVE LOOP FILTERINGJanuary 2022September 2022Allow910NoNo
17570175TARGETS, FIXTURES, AND WORKFLOWS FOR CALIBRATING AN ENDOSCOPIC CAMERAJanuary 2022August 2023Allow1900NoNo
17526472METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SELECTIVELY BREAKING PREDICTION IN VIDEO CODINGNovember 2021August 2023Allow2110NoNo
17525900IMAGE AND VIDEO DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND SYSTEMNovember 2021October 2024Allow3511YesNo
17513540ADAPTIVE LOOP FILTER-BASED VIDEO OR IMAGE CODINGOctober 2021June 2022Allow810NoNo
17479192RESTRICTION ON APPLICABILITY OF CROSS COMPONENT MODESeptember 2021April 2022Allow710NoNo
17460992METHOD OF CODING AND DECODING IMAGES, CODING AND DECODING DEVICE AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS CORRESPONDING THERETOAugust 2021November 2023Allow2610NoNo
17411819METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR NON-LINEAR LOOP FILTERINGAugust 2021October 2024Allow3830YesNo
17432501IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHODAugust 2021March 2024Allow3120YesNo
17399839ADAPTIVE LOOP FILTERING FOR VIDEO CODINGAugust 2021October 2022Allow1520YesNo
17382550APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING DEBLOCKINGJuly 2021November 2023Allow2810NoNo
17424656METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR NON-LINEAR ADAPTIVE LOOP FILTERING IN VIDEO CODINGJuly 2021May 2022Allow1010NoNo
17378464CODECJuly 2021June 2023Allow2300NoNo
17368972RESTRICTIONS ON IN-LOOP FILTERINGJuly 2021September 2022Allow1420NoNo
17367655IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE GENERATING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMJuly 2021January 2025Allow4330YesNo
17416235VIDEO STREAM ADAPTIVE FILTERING FOR BITRATE REDUCTIONJune 2021December 2024Allow4230YesNo
17326588EXTENDED LOW-FREQUENCY NON-SEPARABLE TRANSFORM (LFNST) DESIGNS WITH WORST-CASE COMPLEXITY HANDLINGMay 2021August 2023Allow2710NoNo
17327346HIGH LEVEL CONTROL OF PDPC AND INTRA REFERENCE SAMPLE FILTERING OF VIDEO CODINGMay 2021April 2023Abandon2320NoNo
17303067HIGH-LEVEL DEBLOCKING FILTER (DBF), ADAPTIVE LOOP FILTER (ALF) AND SAMPLE ADAPTIVE OFFSET (SAO) CONTROL, AND ADAPTATION PARAMETER SET (APS) NUMBER CONSTRAINT IN VIDEO CODINGMay 2021October 2023Allow2920YesNo
17317222DOORBELL COMMUNITIESMay 2021June 2024Abandon3721NoNo
17291980SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR APPLYING DEBLOCKING FILTERS TO RECONSTRUCTED VIDEO DATAMay 2021August 2023Allow2730YesNo
17233804ENCODER, DECODER, ENCODING METHOD, AND DECODING METHODApril 2021August 2022Allow1610YesNo
17217808REFERENCE IMAGE ENCODING METHOD, REFERENCE IMAGE DECODING METHOD, REFERENCE IMAGE ENCODING DEVICE, AND REFERENCE IMAGE DECODING DEVICEMarch 2021January 2024Allow3420NoNo
17214422POST-FILTERING FOR WEIGHTED ANGULAR PREDICTIONMarch 2021November 2022Allow2000NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BECKER, JOSEPH W.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
4
Examiner Affirmed
4
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
7.4%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
10
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(20.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
8
(80.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
25.2%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 20.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner BECKER, JOSEPH W - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BECKER, JOSEPH W works in Art Unit 2483 and has examined 187 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 78.6%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 25 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BECKER, JOSEPH W's allowance rate of 78.6% places them in the 47% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BECKER, JOSEPH W receive 1.96 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 49% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BECKER, JOSEPH W is 25 months. This places the examiner in the 79% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +28.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BECKER, JOSEPH W. This interview benefit is in the 77% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 29.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 57% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 25.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 34% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 50.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 63.6% of appeals filed. This is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 28.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 10.8% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 21% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.