Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18758760 | ENCODER, DECODER, ENCODING METHOD, AND DECODING METHOD | June 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18220462 | IMAGE PICKUP UNIT AND ENDOSCOPE | July 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18214780 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SIGNALING NEURAL NETWORK POST-FILTER APPLICATION SPECIFIC PURPOSE INFORMATION IN VIDEO CODING | June 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18195221 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) ENCODING APPARATUS AND METHOD AND AI DECODING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR REGION OF OBJECT OF INTEREST IN IMAGE | May 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18172174 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HADAMARD TRANSFORM DOMAIN FILTERING OF THE VIDEO SIGNAL WITH VARIOUS BIT DEPTH | February 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18164221 | INSPECTION DEVICE, BLISTER PACKING MACHINE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING BLISTER PACK | February 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18099996 | IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, MOBILE OBJECT CONTROL DEVICE, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | January 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17780812 | IMAGE/VIDEO ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND DEVICE | December 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18077675 | IMAGE CAPTURING APPARATUS AND IMAGE CAPTURING METHOD | December 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18072237 | DEVICE AND METHOD WITH GAZE ESTIMATING | November 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17982975 | COMPONENT DEPENDENT INTRA AND INTER PREDICTION SIGNALING | November 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17983017 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ASYMMETRIC BLENDING OF PREDICTIONS OF PARTITIONED PICTURES | November 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17982126 | PREDICTION OF INTRABC FLIP TYPE | November 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17920908 | IMAGING SYSTEM, IMAGING METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM | October 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17919832 | IMAGE GENERATION DEVICE AND HEAD-UP DISPLAY | October 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17917591 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING A REAL IMAGE SIGNAL AND A COMPUTER GRAPHICS SIGNAL TO AN EXTERNAL DEVICE BY WIRELESS COMMUNICATION | October 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17841139 | CONTROL APPARATUS, LENS APPARATUS, IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | June 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17839579 | AUGMENTED REALITY EYEWEAR WITH X-RAY EFFECT | June 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17836378 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CALCULATING A DISTRIBUTOR QUALITY SCORE | June 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17805340 | SEGMENT-WISE PREDICTION MACHINE LEARNING FRAMEWORKS | June 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17824045 | VOLUMETRIC VIDEO IN WEB BROWSWER | May 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17751304 | Detection and Tracking of Humans using Sensor Fusion to Optimize Human to Robot Collaboration in Industry | May 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17750282 | SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM OF AUTOMATICALLY RECOGNIZING MALOCCLUSION CLASS | May 2022 | July 2024 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17770965 | IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, DISPLAY SYSTEM, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | April 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17608370 | INFORMATION COMPRESSION/DECOMPRESSION METHODS AND APPARATUSES, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | November 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17488153 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENCAPSULATING VIDEO DATA INTO A FILE | September 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 42 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17388146 | WHICH LUT TO BE UPDATED OR NO UPDATING | July 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner ZEWEDE, ASTEWAYE GETTU works in Art Unit 2481 and has examined 26 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 76.9%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 28 months.
Examiner ZEWEDE, ASTEWAYE GETTU's allowance rate of 76.9% places them in the 36% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by ZEWEDE, ASTEWAYE GETTU receive 1.62 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 43% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ZEWEDE, ASTEWAYE GETTU is 28 months. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +46.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ZEWEDE, ASTEWAYE GETTU. This interview benefit is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 37.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 82% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 14.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 9% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 200.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 15% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 19% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.