USPTO Examiner HALLENBECK HUBER JEREMIAH CHARLES - Art Unit 2481

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18641259IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND DEVICE, AND RECORDING MEDIUM IN WHICH BITSTREAM IS STOREDApril 2024March 2025Allow1110NoNo
18608059METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING A VIDEO SIGNALMarch 2024June 2025Allow1420NoNo
18418021IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON WRAP-AROUND MOTION COMPENSATION, AND RECORDING MEDIUM STORING BITSTREAMJanuary 2024December 2024Allow1110NoNo
18409147Scalable Prediction Type CodingJanuary 2024February 2025Allow1410NoNo
18407806VIDEO SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD AND DEVICE USING MOTION COMPENSATIONJanuary 2024November 2024Allow1010NoNo
18403318METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PICTURE ENCODING AND DECODINGJanuary 2024April 2025Allow1520NoNo
18391106INTER PREDICTION-BASED IMAGE CODING METHOD AND APPARATUSDecember 2023November 2024Allow1110NoNo
18543968METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIDEO CODINGDecember 2023March 2025Allow1520NoNo
18517737Coefficients Coding In Transform Skip ModeNovember 2023January 2025Allow1320NoNo
18514228Concept Of Interweaved PredictionNovember 2023February 2025Allow1520NoNo
18510196HISTORY-BASED MOTION VECTOR PREDICTIONNovember 2023June 2024Allow700NoNo
18496152VIDEO CODING USING MAPPED TRANSFORMS AND SCANNING MODESOctober 2023January 2025Allow1520NoNo
18494880ENCODING METHOD, DECODING METHOD, AND DECODEROctober 2023December 2024Allow1420NoNo
18494947ENCODING METHOD, DECODING METHOD, AND DECODEROctober 2023August 2024Allow1010NoNo
18489195SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION FOR INTRA BLOCK COPY IN VIDEO CODINGOctober 2023January 2025Allow1520NoNo
18370589SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SPATIAL PREDICTIONSeptember 2023February 2025Allow1720NoNo
18467513METHODS OF SUBBLOCK SKIPPING FOR AFFINE MOTION SEARCH FOR VIDEO CODINGSeptember 2023June 2025Allow2110NoNo
18238340IMAGE DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND IMAGE ENCODING METHOD AND APPARATUSAugust 2023May 2025Allow2120NoNo
18230384VIDEO DECODER AND METHODSAugust 2023July 2024Allow1210NoNo
18226353MOVING PICTURE CODING METHOD, MOVING PICTURE DECODING METHOD, MOVING PICTURE CODING APPARATUS, MOVING PICTURE DECODING APPARATUS, AND MOVING PICTURE CODING AND DECODING APPARATUSJuly 2023June 2024Allow1010NoNo
18352620IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUSJuly 2023June 2024Allow1110NoNo
18336735DECODING AND ENCODING OF NEURAL-NETWORK-BASED BITSTREAMSJune 2023December 2024Allow1810NoNo
18329040Electronic Device Content Provisioning Adjustments based on Wireless Communication Channel Bandwidth ConditionJune 2023August 2024Allow1510NoNo
18317160LOW-COST APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTED REMOTE COLLECTION OF ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR VALUEMay 2023March 2025Abandon2220NoNo
18114791METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INTER PREDICTION IN VIDEO CODING SYSTEMFebruary 2023November 2023Allow910NoNo
18114003INTER PREDICTION-BASED IMAGE CODING METHOD AND APPARATUSFebruary 2023September 2023Allow710NoNo
18156746EVENT ATTENDANCE MONITORING USING A VIRTUAL ASSISTANTJanuary 2023April 2025Allow2710NoNo
18156040CONSTRUCTION METHOD FOR A SPATIAL MOTION CANDIDATE LISTJanuary 2023August 2024Allow1930YesNo
18097579Predictive and Residual Coding of Sparse Signals for Weight Update CompressionJanuary 2023May 2025Allow2810NoNo
18097390SUB-BLOCK MOTION DERIVATION AND DECODER-SIDE MOTION VECTOR REFINEMENT FOR MERGE MODEJanuary 2023September 2024Allow2030YesNo
18092066IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND DEVICE, AND RECORDING MEDIUM IN WHICH BITSTREAM IS STOREDDecember 2022January 2024Allow1210NoNo
18146227VIDEO SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD AND DEVICE USING MOTION COMPENSATIONDecember 2022October 2023Allow910NoNo
18078443ENCODER, DECODER, ENCODING METHOD, AND DECODING METHODDecember 2022October 2024Allow2210NoNo
18078179Foveated Partial Image Compression Using Automatically Detected LandmarksDecember 2022January 2025Allow2510NoNo
17978263SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION FOR INTRA BLOCK COPY IN VIDEO CODINGNovember 2022July 2023Allow910NoNo
17977638GRID-BASED PATCH GENERATION FOR VIDEO-BASED POINT CLOUD CODINGOctober 2022January 2025Allow2710NoNo
17969756APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A WIRELESS, PORTABLE, AND/OR HANDHELD, DEVICE WITH SAFETY FEATURESOctober 2022October 2024Allow2410NoNo
17996207SEMANTICS FOR CONSTRAINED PROCESSING AND CONFORMANCE TESTING IN VIDEO CODINGOctober 2022March 2025Allow2930YesNo
17955719COEFFICIENTS CODING IN TRANSFORM SKIP MODESeptember 2022July 2024Allow2240YesNo
17955927AFFINE MODELS USE IN AFFINE BILATERAL MATCHINGSeptember 2022April 2025Allow3010YesNo
17955525IMPROVED TEMPORAL MERGE CANDIDATES IN MERGE CANDIDATE LISTS IN VIDEO CODINGSeptember 2022July 2024Allow2110NoNo
17952898IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON WRAP-AROUND MOTION COMPENSATION, AND RECORDING MEDIUM STORING BITSTREAMSeptember 2022October 2023Allow1320NoNo
17951900BILATERAL MATCHING WITH AFFINE MOTIONSeptember 2022September 2024Allow2410YesNo
17952193DECODING METHODS AND DEVICES, AND ENCODING METHODS AND DEVICESSeptember 2022December 2024Allow2710NoNo
17945273CONSTRAINTS ON REFERENCE PICTURE ORDERSeptember 2022October 2023Allow1320YesNo
17896350SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SPATIAL PREDICTIONAugust 2022June 2023Allow910NoNo
17886111METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AN EFFICIENT INTER-PREDICTION STRUCTURE AND SIGNALING FOR LOW-DELAY VIDEO STREAMINGAugust 2022June 2024Allow2200NoNo
17886104Collocated Picture Indication In Video BitstreamsAugust 2022February 2024Allow1830YesNo
17885295RESTRICTIONS ON MOTION VECTOR DIFFERENCEAugust 2022September 2023Allow1320NoNo
17875304SIGNALING OF MAXIMUM NUMBER OF TRIANGLE MERGE CANDIDATESJuly 2022February 2024Allow1930YesNo
17871170MOVING PICTURE CODING METHOD, MOVING PICTURE DECODING METHOD, MOVING PICTURE CODING APPARATUS, MOVING PICTURE DECODING APPARATUS, AND MOVING PICTURE CODING AND DECODING APPARATUSJuly 2022April 2023Allow910NoNo
17862217VIDEO CODING USING OPTICAL FLOW AND RESIDUAL PREDICTORSJuly 2022August 2024Allow2510YesNo
17858161ENCODING METHOD, DECODING METHOD, AND DECODERJuly 2022July 2023Allow1320YesNo
17810725VIDEO CODING USING MAPPED TRANSFORMS AND SCANNING MODESJuly 2022April 2023Allow910NoNo
17809167USING UNREFINED MOTION VECTORS FOR PERFORMING DECODER-SIDE MOTION VECTOR DERIVATIONJune 2022September 2024Allow2710NoNo
17806221MOTION VECTOR CANDIDATE CONSTRUCTION FOR GEOMETRIC PARTITIONING MODE IN VIDEO CODINGJune 2022July 2024Allow2510NoNo
17832748PRIMARY AND AUXILIARY IMAGE CAPTURE DEVICES FOR IMAGE PROCESSING AND RELATED METHODSJune 2022June 2023Abandon1310NoNo
17615473IMAGE DECODING DEVICE, IMAGE DECODING METHOD, AND PROGRAMJune 2022March 2025Abandon3920YesNo
17753859OVER-THE-EYE APPARATUS FOR CAPTURING IMAGES FROM A USER'S POINT OF VIEWMarch 2022December 2024Allow3311NoNo
17679864DISPLAY APPARATUSFebruary 2022April 2023Allow1410NoNo
17676824INTRA-PREDICTION ESTIMATION USING APPROXIMATE RECONSTRUCTED SAMPLESFebruary 2022September 2023Allow1920NoNo
17674946VEHICLE DISPLAY DEVICE, VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM, VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMFebruary 2022November 2023Allow2110NoNo
17569416METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIDEO CODINGJanuary 2022May 2023Allow1610NoNo
17561275IDENTIFYING LONG TERM REFERENCE FRAME USING SCENE DETECTION AND PERCEPTUAL HASHINGDecember 2021November 2023Allow2220NoNo
17560214FOLLOWING SHOOT METHOD, GIMBAL CONTROL METHOD, PHOTOGRAPHING APPARATUS, HANDHELD GIMBAL AND PHOTOGRAPHING SYSTEMDecember 2021April 2025Allow4030YesNo
17554294MOTION PRECISION IN SUB-BLOCK BASED INTER PREDICTIONDecember 2021August 2023Allow2040YesNo
17545156SYSTEMS, METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR COMPRESSING VIDEO CONTENTDecember 2021February 2024Allow2600NoNo
17539945SEMI-GLOBAL MATCHING (SGM) COST COMPRESSIONDecember 2021July 2023Allow2020NoNo
17612738SUB-BLOCK DIVISION-BASED IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND DEVICENovember 2021March 2024Allow2810NoNo
17607211VIDEO GENERATION APPARATUS, METHOD AND PROGRAMOctober 2021July 2024Allow3210NoNo
17495797GENERATIVE ADVERSARIAL NETWORK FOR VIDEO COMPRESSIONOctober 2021March 2024Allow3010NoNo
17474078SYSTEMS, METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR STEREO VISION AND TRACKINGSeptember 2021August 2023Allow2320NoNo
17468385THUMBNAIL CACHESeptember 2021August 2024Abandon3530YesNo
17435347COLOR AND INFRARED IMAGE SENSORAugust 2021August 2024Abandon3620NoNo
17408082METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIDEO CODINGAugust 2021September 2023Allow2530NoNo
17395133VIDEO CODING WITH CONTENT ADAPTIVE SPATIALLY VARYING QUANTIZATIONAugust 2021May 2023Allow2120NoNo
17385466THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGER AND PROJECTION DEVICEJuly 2021July 2024Allow3630NoNo
17365843NUMBER OF MOTION CANDIDATES IN A LOOK UP TABLE TO BE CHECKED ACCORDING TO MODEJuly 2021October 2023Allow2730NoNo
17419361HISTORY-BASED MOTION VECTOR PREDICTIONJune 2021March 2024Abandon3220NoNo
17359890MOTION VECTOR DERIVATION BETWEEN DIVIDING PATTERNSJune 2021October 2023Allow2710NoNo
17413419METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING VIDEO DATAJune 2021September 2023Allow2710NoNo
17342033METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING A VIDEO SIGNALJune 2021December 2023Allow3020NoNo
17311800IMAGE ENCODING APPARATUS, IMAGE ENCODING METHOD, IMAGE DECODING APPARATUS, AND IMAGE DECODING METHODJune 2021December 2023Abandon3010NoNo
17298589DOUBLE-BLINDED, RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF AUGMENTED REALITY LOW-VISION MOBILITY AND GRASP AIDMay 2021June 2025Allow4940NoNo
17296934DEFECT INSPECTION APPARATUS AND DEFECT INSPECTION METHODMay 2021March 2025Abandon4530NoNo
17317375BLENDING METHOD FOR INTER PREDICTION WITH GEOMETRY PARTITIONMay 2021August 2023Allow2710NoNo
17238548SUB-BLOCK MOTION CANDIDATE LIST IN VIDEO CODINGApril 2021April 2023Allow2420YesNo
17237924VIDEO DECODER AND METHODSApril 2021May 2023Allow2430NoNo
17216633METHOD FOR MOTION ESTIMATION, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEMarch 2021March 2023Allow2400NoNo
17188691METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING CANDIDATE MOTION INFORMATION LIST, INTER PREDICTION METHOD, AND APPARATUSMarch 2021September 2023Allow3120YesNo
17183790PRUNING IN MULTI-MOTION MODEL BASED SKIP AND DIRECT MODE CODED VIDEO BLOCKSFebruary 2021July 2023Allow2820YesNo
17136983HISTORY-BASED MOTION VECTOR PREDICTOR CONSTRAINT FOR MERGE ESTIMATION REGIONDecember 2020March 2023Allow2710NoNo
17135054SELECTION OF CODED MOTION INFORMATION FOR LUT UPDATINGDecember 2020March 2023Allow2610NoNo
17252019IMAGE ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUSDecember 2020June 2023Allow3050NoNo
16951137CONCEPT OF INTERWEAVED PREDICTIONNovember 2020July 2023Allow3220YesNo
17056111Method and Apparatus of Video Coding Using Bi-Directional CU WeightNovember 2020April 2023Abandon2930NoYes
17082651Autonomous Virtual WallOctober 2020March 2025Abandon5230NoNo
17038719INTELLIGENT COMPUTING RESOURCES ALLOCATION FOR FEATURE NETWORK BASED ON FEATURE PROPAGATIONSeptember 2020August 2024Allow4750YesNo
17015137Scalable Prediction Type CodingSeptember 2020August 2023Allow3550NoNo
16932475SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING DIGITAL MULTIMEDIA CONTENTS INCLUDING MOVIES AND TV SHOWSJuly 2020March 2023Allow3230YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner HALLENBECK-HUBER, JEREMIAH CHARLES.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
4
Examiner Affirmed
1
(25.0%)
Examiner Reversed
3
(75.0%)
Reversal Percentile
88.9%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 75.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
4
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(75.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(25.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
93.5%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 75.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner HALLENBECK-HUBER, JEREMIAH CHARLES - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner HALLENBECK-HUBER, JEREMIAH CHARLES works in Art Unit 2481 and has examined 110 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 90.0%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 25 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner HALLENBECK-HUBER, JEREMIAH CHARLES's allowance rate of 90.0% places them in the 70% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by HALLENBECK-HUBER, JEREMIAH CHARLES receive 2.12 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 71% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HALLENBECK-HUBER, JEREMIAH CHARLES is 25 months. This places the examiner in the 66% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +3.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HALLENBECK-HUBER, JEREMIAH CHARLES. This interview benefit is in the 25% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 33.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 42.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 57% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 42.9% of appeals filed. This is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 31.6% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 15% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 19% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.