Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18429029 | DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF CODED MODULATION SYMBOLS IN UPLINK CONTROL INFORMATION | January 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18470686 | METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR MANAGING DUTY CYCLE IN WIRELESS LOCAL ACCESS NETWORKS (WLANS) | September 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18370347 | Method, Apparatus and System for Network Energy Saving | September 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17990483 | COMMUNICATION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM | November 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17926406 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING TIME DENSITY RELATED TO PT-RS IN NR V2X | November 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18052278 | Time-Domain Resource Allocation for Multi-Cell Scheduling by a Single DCI | November 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17915195 | ROUTING CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND BORDER GATEWAY PROTOCOL PEER | September 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17935745 | UPLINK AND CONTROL CHANNEL AWARE SKIP HANDOVER IN ADVANCED NETWORKS | September 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17932164 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING TRUNCATED MAC CONTROL ELEMENT REPORT BY USER EQUIPMENT IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | September 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17882269 | OPERATION METHOD RELATED TO PAGING MONITORING IN A SIDELINK RELAY IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | August 2022 | August 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17797404 | CELL MOBILITY IN HANDLING MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE EVENT | August 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17875822 | POWER CONTROL METHOD AND DEVICE | July 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17812846 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING BACK-OFF TIMER TO UES DURING NETWORK SLICE ADMISSION CONTROL | July 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17846087 | METAVERSE END-TO-END (E2E) NETWORK ARCHITECTURE | June 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17837387 | Optimization Of BCC Interleaver And LDPC Tone Mapper For Distributed-Tone Resource Units And Distributed-Tone Multi-Resource Units | June 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17561528 | APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DURING A SHORT-INTER-FRAME-SPACE (SIFS) | December 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 38 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner PHAM, NHU works in Art Unit 2479 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 38 months.
Examiner PHAM, NHU's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by PHAM, NHU receive 0.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PHAM, NHU is 38 months. This places the examiner in the 30% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 21% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.