USPTO Examiner LEE JAE YOUNG - Art Unit 2479

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
16343319BROADCAST SIGNAL TRANSMISSION/RECEPTION DEVICE AND METHODApril 2019April 2020Allow1200NoNo
16261731CODING AND DECODING OF A POLAR CODE CONCATENATED WITH INTERLEAVING WITH AN OUTER SYSTEMATIC CODEJanuary 2019July 2019Allow610NoNo
15774653ECHO CANCELLER DEVICE AND VOICE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICEMay 2018July 2019Allow1500NoNo
15915986RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHODMarch 2018April 2019Allow1310NoNo
15746742TERMINAL, BASE STATION, TRANSMISSION METHOD, AND RECEPTION METHODJanuary 2018January 2020Allow2420NoNo
15699797METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUPPORTING FEMTOCELL SERVICE CAPABILITIES FOR SERVICESSeptember 2017October 2018Allow1310YesNo
15548190RESOLUTION OF BEAM AND NODE IDENTITIES FOR DUAL CONNECTIVITYAugust 2017November 2018Allow1610NoNo
15218797WIRELESS COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHODJuly 2016June 2018Allow2210NoNo
15145948MONITORING VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (VoIP) QUALITY DURING AN ONGOING CALLMay 2016October 2016Allow510YesNo
15025785BACKHAUL SIGNALING SUPPORT FOR UL-DL INTERFERENCE MANAGEMENT FOR TDD eIMTAMarch 2016October 2018Allow3120NoNo
15061279MONITORING VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (VoIP) QUALITY DURING AN ONGOING CALLMarch 2016August 2016Allow510YesNo
14913042MOBILE COMMUNICATION METHODFebruary 2016November 2017Allow2001YesNo
15000245Systems and Methods to Format and Encode Aviation Data for Improved TransmittabilityJanuary 2016February 2018Allow2520NoNo
14899663Collaboration Method and System in Distributed Resilient Network Interconnect SystemDecember 2015October 2017Allow2220NoNo
14723238METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IDENTIFICATION AND TRANSFER IN INTERNET PROTOCOL MULTIMEDIA SUBSYSTEM COLLABORATIVE SESSIONSMay 2015September 2016Allow1600NoNo
14439984RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHODApril 2015December 2017Allow3121YesNo
14609550MONITORING VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (VOIP) QUALITY DURING AN ONGOING CALLJanuary 2015April 2016Allow1420YesNo
14395943METHOD FOR ESTIMATING CHANNEL IN WIRELESS ACCESS SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR SAMEOctober 2014August 2016Allow2100NoNo
14395784METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ESTABLISHING DEVICE-TO-DEVICE CONNECTION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMOctober 2014July 2016Allow2101YesNo
14338601MULTI-PATH SEARCH APPARATUS AND METHOD IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMJuly 2014May 2016Allow2210NoNo
14337457MONITORING VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (VoIP) QUALITY DURING AN ONGOING CALLJuly 2014January 2016Allow1810NoNo
14323137METHODS AND DEVICES FOR ALLOCATING A RADIO RESOURCE FOR AN LTE-UNLICENSED DATA TRANSMISSIONJuly 2014July 2016Allow2420YesNo
14323255DATA TRANSPORT SYSTEM, TRANSMISSION METHOD, AND TRANSPORT APPARATUSJuly 2014July 2016Allow2520NoNo
14254065APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTING A REFERENCE TIMINGApril 2014March 2016Allow2310NoNo
14253842SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SYNCHRONIZING TIMING BETWEEN WIRELESS NETWORKING DEVICESApril 2014May 2016Allow2620NoNo
14252974UNIFIED CONGESTION CONTROL FOR REAL-TIME MEDIA SUPPORTApril 2014October 2016Allow3030YesNo
14252636SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING WLAN POWER SAVING USING AN ALTERNATE WIRELESS PROTOCOLApril 2014October 2016Allow3030NoNo
14111746METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING ADDRESS OF A MACHINE TYPE COMMUNICATION DEVICE IN A WIRELESS NETWORKApril 2014February 2016Allow2820NoNo
13813757METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUPPORTING FEMTOCELL SERVICE CAPABILITIES FOR SERVICESJanuary 2014June 2017Allow5220NoNo
13639083ADAPTIVE SCHEDULING AND HARQ MANAGEMENT FOR COOPERATIVE TRANSMISSIONSJanuary 2014November 2015Allow3810NoNo
14110720QUALITY OF EXPERIENCEJanuary 2014May 2016Allow3120YesNo
13879526HOMOGENEOUS CIRCUIT SWITCHED VOICE SUPPORT INDICATION IN A MOBILE NETWORKJanuary 2014September 2015Allow2910NoNo
14110493METHOD FOR A TRANSMITTER FOR A MULTI-CHANNEL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR SENDING REAL-TIME DATADecember 2013January 2016Allow2710NoNo
14110612QOS AWARE MULTI RADIO ACCESS POINT FOR OPERATION IN TV WHITESPACESDecember 2013October 2015Allow2510NoNo
14110547APPARATUS AND METHOD TO REDUCE INTERFERENCE BETWEEN DISPARATE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMSDecember 2013September 2016Allow3840YesNo
14098110METHOD FOR SETTING NETWORK INFORMATION IN COMMUNICATION DEVICE, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICEDecember 2013November 2016Allow3640NoNo
14022113TIERED CONTENTION MULTIPLE ACCESS (TCMA): A METHOD FOR PRIORITY-BASED SHARED CHANNEL ACCESSSeptember 2013September 2015Allow2530YesNo
13825804CHANNEL ACCESS SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COGNITIVE RELAYING FOR CELLULAR SYSTEMSJuly 2013March 2016Allow3630YesNo
13831485MEDIA DEVICE CONFIGURATION AND ECOSYSTEM SETUPMarch 2013October 2015Allow3111NoNo
13704666METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SINR ESTIMATIONDecember 2012April 2015Allow2820YesNo
13704561METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING PROTOCOL CONNECTION IN PBB NETWORK AND BEB NODEDecember 2012April 2015Allow2820YesNo
13704520LOCAL SELECTION OF RETRANSMITTING DEVICE IN COOPERATIVE CLUSTER TO ENHANCE CELLULAR MULTICASTDecember 2012August 2014Allow2000YesNo
13704555METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT IN A COMMUNICATION NETWORKDecember 2012October 2015Allow3440YesNo
13668517METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SPEED NEGOTIATION FOR TWISTED PAIR LINKS USING INTELLIGENT E-FIFO IN FIBRE CHANNEL SYSTEMSNovember 2012April 2015Allow2940YesNo
13512262DETECTION OF WIRING DEFECTSSeptember 2012March 2015Allow3420NoNo
13614244THIRD PARTY CHARGING FOR SIP SESSIONSSeptember 2012August 2014Allow2310NoNo
13452637SIGNALING TO APPLICATION LACK OF REQUESTED BANDWIDTHApril 2012December 2012Allow810YesNo
13449312STACK SIGNALING TO APPLICATION WITH LACK OF REQUESTED BANDWIDTHApril 2012January 2013Allow900YesNo
13318284METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING A BODY AREA NEWORK USING A COORDINATOR DEVICEOctober 2011October 2014Allow3620NoNo
13318239COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND A DELAY AMOUNT DETECTION METHODOctober 2011March 2014Allow2900NoNo
13275896EXPEDITED RESOURCE NEGOTIATION IN SIPOctober 2011August 2014Abandon3440YesYes
13234006REDUCTION OF LEAKAGE CURRENT IN MOBILE DEVICE WITH EMBEDDED BATTERYSeptember 2011February 2015Allow4100NoNo
13233977SYSTEMS FOR REMOTELY WAKING UP APPLICATION PROCESSOR OF MOBILE DEVICESeptember 2011May 2014Allow3210NoNo
13205401METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR A SCALABLE RADIO ARCHITECTUREAugust 2011February 2013Allow1800NoNo
13146095PRECODING IN TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKJuly 2011August 2014Allow3720NoNo
13146080METHOD OF TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING DATA IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMJuly 2011April 2014Allow3211NoNo
13145862APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING MULTIMEDIA BROADCAST/MULTICAST SERVICE IN MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMJuly 2011December 2013Allow2920NoNo
13042380REMOTE WAKEUP OF APPLICATION PROCESSOR OF MOBILE DEVICEMarch 2011May 2014Allow3820NoNo
13041670APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR RECEIVING STREAMING DATA IN A PORTABLE TERMINALMarch 2011July 2013Allow2910NoNo
12830948HIGH AVAILABILITY TRANSPORT PROTOCOL METHOD AND APPARATUSJuly 2010May 2013Allow3450YesNo
12669604APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TRANSMIT/RECEIVE OF IMAGE DATAMarch 2010July 2013Allow4210NoNo
12582901NETWORK RELAY APPARATUSOctober 2009November 2013Allow4921YesNo
12582018METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SYMMETRIC ROUTINGOctober 2009September 2013Allow4720YesNo
12581113METHODS FOR SUPPORTING RAPID NETWORK TOPOLOGY CHANGES WITH LOW OVERHEAD COSTS AND DEVICES OF THE SAMEOctober 2009January 2013Allow3910NoNo
12574347CROSS-CONNECT METHOD AND CROSS-CONNECT APPARATUSOctober 2009June 2014Allow5620YesNo
12574474METHOD FOR APPLICATION BROADCAST FORWARDING FOR ROUTERS RUNNING REDUNDANCY PROTOCOLSOctober 2009August 2014Allow5840YesYes
12573193RECEIVER DEVICE, TRANSMISSION SYSTEM, AND PACKET TRANSMISSION METHODOctober 2009April 2013Allow4311YesNo
12572586COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND ACCESS GATEWAY APPARATUSOctober 2009March 2012Allow3010YesNo
12571008WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMSeptember 2009February 2012Allow2940YesNo
12521948TRAIN CAR-TO-CAR COMMUNICATION DEVICEJuly 2009April 2012Allow3400YesNo
11917874BASE STATION AND METHOD FOR USE THEREINMay 2009December 2011Allow4820YesNo
12345618PACKET PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR REALIZING WIRE-SPEED, AND METHOD THEREOFDecember 2008November 2012Allow4740YesNo
12250236FIXED-POINT IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ADAPTIVE IMAGE FILTER WITH HIGH CODING EFFICIENCYOctober 2008December 2012Allow5020NoNo
11917871CHANNEL ASSIGNMENT APPARATUS AND CHANNEL ASSIGNMENT METHODSeptember 2008November 2011Allow4720YesNo
11884796RADIOCOMMUNICATION SYSTEM MOBILE STATION WHICH CAN COMMUNICATE DIRECTLY WITH ANOTHER MOBILE STATIONMay 2008February 2012Allow5420YesNo
11871640METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CODING IMAGES REPRESENTING VIEWS OF THE SAME SCENEOctober 2007October 2013Allow6020YesNo
11885412RELAY DEVICEAugust 2007May 2012Allow5630NoNo
11846984METHOD OF IMPROVING THROUGHPUT IN A SYSTEM INCLUDING PERSISTENT ASSIGNMENTSAugust 2007May 2013Allow6050YesNo
11833799DELIVERY OF DATA PACKETS VIA AGGREGATED SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OVERLAY ON A MESH NETWORKAugust 2007January 2012Allow5330YesNo
11733558PLURAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS FUNCTIONS HAVING SHARING TRANSACTION(S)April 2007October 2011Allow5430YesNo
11731359TEREDO CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN CLIENTS BEHIND SYMMETRIC NATSMarch 2007January 2012Allow5850YesNo
11731696LAYERED APPROACH FOR REPRESENTING AND ANALYZING VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK SERVICESMarch 2007January 2012Allow5750YesNo
11660919METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LOCALISING USERS FOR SERVICES BASED ON SIP OR H.323 PROTOCOLS WITH DYNAMIC IP ADDRESS ALLOCATIONFebruary 2007October 2012Allow6040YesNo
11616701BIFURCATED CONFERENCING FUNCTIONSDecember 2006October 2013Allow6040NoYes
11588924Profile sharing across personaOctober 2006September 2013Allow6040YesNo
11541808PACKET TRANSMISSION APPARATUS, PACKET FORWARDING METHOD AND PACKET TRANSMISSION SYSTEMOctober 2006July 2011Allow5820YesNo
11536944MULTIPLE PEER GROUPS FOR EFFICIENT SCALABLE COMPUTINGSeptember 2006October 2010Allow4830YesNo
11536315INDIVIDUAL END-TO-END D/DV/L MEASUREMENT IN IP MULTICASTSeptember 2006June 2012Allow6060YesNo
11507225TIERED CONTENTION MULTIPLE ACCESS (TCMA): A METHOD FOR PRIORITY-BASED SHARED CHANNEL ACCESSAugust 2006May 2013Allow6050YesNo
11492068DELAY REDUCTION METHOD FOR TELEPHONY SYSTEMS WITH MULTIPLE PACKET GENERATORSJuly 2006December 2011Allow6050YesNo
11432624EXPEDITED RESOURCE NEGOTIATION IN SIPMay 2006July 2011Allow6050YesYes
11433804STACK SIGNALING TO APPLICATION WITH LACK OF REQUESTED BANDWIDTHMay 2006December 2011Allow6060YesNo
11400440METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPERATING IN A WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK BASED ON INFORMATION FROM A WIRELESS WIDE AREA NETWORKApril 2006March 2012Allow6060YesNo
11400755QOS-BASED ROUTING FOR CE-BASED VPNApril 2006August 2010Abandon5250YesNo
11400748BUFFERING IN STREAMING DELIVERYApril 2006August 2010Allow5240YesNo
10557058METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING A PUSH-TO-TALK SERVICE IN A MOBILE RADIO COMMUNICATION NETWORK OF THE GSM-TYPEFebruary 2006March 2012Allow6060YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner LEE, JAE YOUNG.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
4
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(25.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(75.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
35.9%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 25.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner LEE, JAE YOUNG - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner LEE, JAE YOUNG works in Art Unit 2479 and has examined 96 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 97.9%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner LEE, JAE YOUNG's allowance rate of 97.9% places them in the 89% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by LEE, JAE YOUNG receive 2.25 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 58% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LEE, JAE YOUNG is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -3.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LEE, JAE YOUNG. This interview benefit is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 34.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 23.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 133.3% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 86% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 75.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 35.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 3.1% of allowed cases (in the 81% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 22% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.