Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18967703 | EDGE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR HANDLING SERVICE FOR MULTIPLE SERVICE PROVIDERS | December 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18244404 | Network Protocol for View Replication Over Unreliable Networks | September 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18336817 | MEASUREMENT MODEL BASED ON UPLINK SIGNALS WITH RECIPROCITY TO DOWNLINK BEAM | June 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18188532 | SCALED-OUT TRANSPORT AS CONNECTION PROXY FOR DEVICE-TO-DEVICE COMMUNICATIONS | March 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18090318 | TDD-TO-FDD HANDOVER BASED ON SERVICE TYPE AND UPLINK QUALITY | December 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18069012 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SEAMLESSLY TRANSFERRING A RADIO CONNECTION BETWEEN COMPONENTS OF A CLIMATE CONTROL SYSTEM | December 2022 | April 2024 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18069040 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SEAMLESSLY TRANSFERRING A RADIO CONNECTION BETWEEN COMPONENTS OF A CLIMATE CONTROL SYSTEM | December 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17998996 | RESOURCE COLLISION AVOIDANCE IN SIDELINK FOR DISCONTINUOUS RECEPTION (DRX) | November 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17779317 | DEPLOYMENT CONTROL SYSTEM, DEPLOYMENT CONTROL METHOD, AND DEPLOYMENT CONTROL PROGRAM | May 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17774628 | DETECTION AND TRIGGERING FOR UE-TO-UE P2P TRAFFIC FLOW ROUTING OPTIMIZATION | May 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17773830 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ALLOCATING BEAM FAILURE REQUEST RESOURCES | May 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17661037 | EDGE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR HANDLING SERVICE FOR MULTIPLE SERVICE PROVIDERS | April 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17712913 | USING A ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR NETWORK PORT FAILOVER | April 2022 | June 2024 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17754493 | Enhancements to Simultaneous Transmit/Reception in an Integrated Access and Backhaul Node | April 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17653370 | COLLISION MITIGATION FOR A DUAL SUBSCRIBER IDENTITY MODULE (SIM) DUAL ACTIVE (DSDA) USER EQUIPMENT | March 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17653443 | NETWORK ASSISTED UPLINK TRANSMISSION ANTENNA PORTS SELECTION | March 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17626291 | METHOD FOR PROVIDING HIGH AVAILABILITY SERVICE THROUGH GNB REALLOCATION AND DEVICE THEREFOR | January 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17559264 | METHOD FOR SELECTING CELL IN NTN AND APPARATUS | December 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17547679 | APPARATUS AND METHOD OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION | December 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17596342 | METHOD FOR PERFORMING LOW LATENCY COMMUNICATION IN WIRELESS LAN SYSTEM | December 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17545718 | FEEDBACK INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE | December 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17594762 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING DATA-DRIVEN INTELLIGENT NETWORK WITH FLOW CONTROL OF INDIVIDUAL APPLICATIONS AND TRAFFIC FLOWS | October 2021 | March 2024 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17602497 | USER TERMINAL AND RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD | October 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17602286 | COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND COMMUNICATION METHOD | October 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17593313 | CHANNEL-STATE INFORMATION FEEDBACK ENHANCEMENT FOR ULTRA-RELIABLE LOW-LATENCY COMMUNICATION | September 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17460467 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NETWORK TRAFFIC SHAPING | August 2021 | October 2024 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17410909 | TIMING ADVANCE IN FULL-DUPLEX COMMUNICATION | August 2021 | November 2023 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17431258 | METHOD FOR GENERATING LOW PAPR SEQUENCE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND APPARATUS FOR SAME | August 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17343242 | CONTROL OVERHEAD REDUCTION IN SIDELINK NETWORK | June 2021 | October 2023 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17337941 | TECHNIQUES FOR CONFIGURING DOWNLINK CONTROL INFORMATION FOR MULTI-BEAM FULL-DUPLEX OPERATION | June 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17333809 | DETERMINATION OF SPATIAL ORIENTATION | May 2021 | May 2024 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17329863 | CONFIGURATION AND USE OF ALLOCATED BANDWIDTHS FOR PREDEFINED SERVICE CLASSIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH PREDEFINED TYPES OF A COMMUNICATION RESOURCE AT A USER PLANE FUNCTION NODE | May 2021 | May 2024 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17302722 | Multicast Broadcast Service for 5G New Radio | May 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17315459 | MULTICAST TREE TOPOLOGY HAVING MULTICAST HUBS FOR DIFFERENT MULTICAST AREAS IN A WI-SUN FAN DATA NETWORK | May 2021 | April 2023 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17244317 | DISTRIBUTED MULTI-ACCESS EDGE SERVICE DELIVERY | April 2021 | August 2023 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17235109 | TECHNIQUES FOR INDICATING DUPLEX MODE CAPABILITY | April 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17213994 | MEASUREMENT MODEL BASED ON UPLINK SIGNALS WITH RECIPROCITY TO DOWNLINK BEAM | March 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17212848 | INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM AND PERIPHERAL GROUP WAKEUP RADIO INTERFACE SYNCHRONIZED COMMUNICATIONS | March 2021 | January 2024 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17197397 | UPDATING FLOW CACHE INFORMATION FOR PACKET PROCESSING | March 2021 | September 2023 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17198011 | CELL-GROUP SLOT FORMAT INDICATION (SFI) | March 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17193011 | DYNAMIC GROUPING IN A COMMUNICATION DEVICE | March 2021 | March 2023 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17187495 | TDD-TO-FDD HANDOVER BASED ON SERVICE TYPE AND UPLINK QUALITY | February 2021 | December 2022 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17249063 | MANAGEMENT OF ANTENNA SWITCHING ACCORDING TO A SOUNDING REFERENCE SYMBOL ANTENNA SWITCHING CONFIGURATION | February 2021 | April 2023 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17178121 | ULI Cell Selection Prioritization | February 2021 | October 2022 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17248828 | SCALED-OUT TRANSPORT AS CONNECTION PROXY FOR DEVICE-TO-DEVICE COMMUNICATIONS | February 2021 | December 2022 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17165368 | FORWARD PREDICTIVE PRECODED MIMO | February 2021 | November 2023 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17263463 | CHANNEL QUALITY MEASUREMENT REPORTING | January 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 46 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17150762 | METHOD AND SYSTEM TO SCALE ROUTING IN ETHERNET VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK SYMMETRIC INTEGRATED ROUTING AND BRIDGING DEPLOYMENTS | January 2021 | July 2023 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17142437 | SHARED NETWORK PROCESSING UNIT | January 2021 | February 2023 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17139755 | PRIORITIZATION IN AERONAUTICAL SATELLITE NETWORKS | December 2020 | October 2023 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17255743 | USER EQUIPMENT | December 2020 | February 2023 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17115728 | BEAM AND CELL SELECTION BASED ON POWER CONFIGURATION | December 2020 | August 2024 | Allow | 45 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17090965 | Network Protocol for View Replication Over Unreliable Networks | November 2020 | June 2023 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17052004 | METHOD FOR MANAGING FIRST ACCESS NETWORK NODE, APPARATUS, GENERALIZED NODE-B, GNB, OF 5G NETWORK, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT, AND DATA SET | October 2020 | November 2024 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17079376 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMMUNICATING WITH PAYLOAD ON AN UNMANNED VEHICLE | October 2020 | October 2023 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17075485 | PINPOINTING SOURCES OF JITTER IN NETWORK FLOWS | October 2020 | September 2023 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16976875 | Method and Apparatus for Synchronizing Radio Network Nodes | August 2020 | June 2023 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16999187 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TELEOPERATIONS AND SUPPORT SERVICES | August 2020 | November 2024 | Allow | 51 | 6 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16969981 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE, INFRASTRUCTURE EQUIPMENT AND METHOD TO TRANSMIT A PAGING MESSAGE | August 2020 | March 2025 | Allow | 55 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16991646 | CROSS-SUBSCRIPTION MULTI-VNET HOMING | August 2020 | June 2023 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16923950 | Systems and Methods for Seamlessly Transferring a Radio Connection Between Components of a Climate Control System | July 2020 | October 2022 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16922838 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR WIRELESS RECEPTION | July 2020 | September 2023 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16911904 | NON-PUBLIC NETWORKS SUPPORT BY NG RADIO ACCESS NETWORK (NG-RAN) | June 2020 | January 2025 | Abandon | 54 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16731048 | INFORMATION MANAGEMENT APPARATUS AND TERMINAL APPARATUS | December 2019 | November 2023 | Abandon | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16682195 | ETHERNET SWITCH AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME | November 2019 | July 2022 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16452169 | VEHICLE COMPONENT USAGE | June 2019 | July 2023 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SEN, ANINDITA.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner SEN, ANINDITA works in Art Unit 2478 and has examined 65 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 84.6%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.
Examiner SEN, ANINDITA's allowance rate of 84.6% places them in the 55% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by SEN, ANINDITA receive 1.88 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 59% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SEN, ANINDITA is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 32% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +10.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SEN, ANINDITA. This interview benefit is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 32.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 59% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 41.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 57% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 75.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 150.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 14% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 19% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.