Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18642157 | PERSISTING PRIVATE MOBILE WIRELESS NETWORK PREFERENCE FOR MOBILE WIRELESS NETWORK DEVICES ON PRIVATE NETWORKS | April 2024 | April 2025 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18236320 | APPLICATION LAYER GROUP SERVICES FOR MACHINE TYPE COMMUNICATIONS | August 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18177737 | UPLINK AND DOWNLINK PRESCHEDULING IN FIXED WIRELESS ACCESS NETWORKS | March 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17973265 | METHOD OF ALLOCATION IN AN ON-BOARD DATA TRANSMISSION NETWORK IN A MOBILE PASSENGER TRANSPORT VEHICLE AND ASSOCIATED COMPUTER PROGRAM | October 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 31 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17918381 | IMPROVING COVERAGE IN A HIGH FREQUENCY RANGE | October 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17950899 | ORBITAL ANGULAR MOMENTUM MULTIPLEXING BASED ON A COMMON FACTOR BETWEEN QUANTITIES OF TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE ANTENNA SUBARRAYS | September 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 31 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17799001 | CONDITIONALLY HANDLING HYBRID AUTOMATIC REPEAT REQUEST PROCESS IN CONFIGURATION GRANT ACTIVATION PROCEDURE | August 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 31 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17815553 | UE GROUPS, UE GROUP MANAGER UEs AND UE GROUP MEMBER UEs | July 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17859986 | PRIVATE NETWORK | July 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17832217 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING DSS POLICY BETWEEN MULTIPLE RATS | June 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17746408 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR CONFIGURING SYSTEM PARAMETERS RELATED TO LOAD CONTROL IN MULTI-FREQUENCY WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORK AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF | May 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17775761 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING WIRELESS SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | May 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17755768 | TERMINAL | May 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17755703 | Reporting Framework for Dynamic UE Capabilities | May 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17708686 | METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING SERVICE CONTINUITY AND RELATED DEVICE | March 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17587870 | MEASUREMENT REPORTING METHOD AND APPARATUS | January 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17627931 | NOISE CANCELLATION DEVICE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM INCLUDING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES CONFIGURED AS ARRAY | January 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17646510 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PACKET DATA NETWORK SERVICE SLICING OVER A NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE FOR REAL-TIME IP SERVICES | December 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17554955 | MESSAGE TRANSMISSION METHOD AND CORRESPONDING DEVICE | December 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17613827 | DETECTION METHOD, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR DETECTING CONTROL SIGNALING | November 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17512830 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HANDLING PROTOCOL DATA UNIT SESSION, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | October 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17607087 | Methods and Apparatuses for Beam Measurement | October 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17498595 | TECHNIQUES FOR IDENTIFYING CONTROL CHANNEL CANDIDATES BASED ON REFERENCE SIGNAL SEQUENCES | October 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17472578 | Dual Connectivity Uplink Power Management | September 2021 | May 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner EMADI, MARYAM NMN works in Art Unit 2478 and has examined 23 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 95.7%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 33 months.
Examiner EMADI, MARYAM NMN's allowance rate of 95.7% places them in the 87% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by EMADI, MARYAM NMN receive 0.96 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 11% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by EMADI, MARYAM NMN is 33 months. This places the examiner in the 28% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +5.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by EMADI, MARYAM NMN. This interview benefit is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 14% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 19% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.