Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19065411 | Handling on Retransmission for Extended Reality | February 2025 | August 2025 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 19040149 | Sidelink Radio Link Management | January 2025 | August 2025 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18742792 | USER EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEM PERFORMING TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION OPERATIONS | June 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18668349 | QOS Management Aspects for NR Sidelink to Support Advanced V2X Use Cases | May 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18283064 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR PUSCH REPETITION | September 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18041780 | DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM | February 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18007083 | ENHANCED ONE-SHOT HARQ-ACK CODEBOOK TRANSMISSION | January 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18016906 | METHOD PERFORMED BY USER EQUIPMENT, AND USER EQUIPMENT | January 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17998319 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TRANSMITTING/RECEIVING CSI-RS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | November 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17975618 | METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION | October 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17919331 | Methods and Apparatus for Disabled HARQ Processes | October 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17958133 | DEFERRED SEMI-PERSISTENT SCHEDULING (SPS) HYBRID AUTOMATIC REPEAT REQUEST (HARQ) CODEBOOK APPENDING ORDER AND PRIORITY | September 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17952792 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HYBRID AUTOMATIC REPEAT REQUEST-ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RETRANSMISSION | September 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17912542 | MULTI-DCI BASED PDSCH SCHEDULING FOR URLLC | September 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17911310 | METHODS, ARCHITECTURES, APPARATUSES AND SYSTEMS DIRECTED TO PHYSICAL LAYER SIGNALING IN A WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK ("WLAN") SYSTEM | September 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17909850 | Methods for Low Energy Movement Detection in Wireless Communication Devices | September 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17823636 | CELLULAR NETWORK OVER THE AIR USER EQUIPMENT BEAM MANAGEMENT EMULATION AND TESTING | August 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17880620 | METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION | August 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17878853 | Optimized S1-X2 Handovers | August 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17758623 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ACQUIRING COMMUNICATION SERVICES | July 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17848262 | COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | June 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17807641 | Cell Reselection Method and System, and Apparatus | June 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17652664 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING RESOURCES FOR PUCCH TRANSMISSION WITH ACKNOWLEDGMENT INFORMATION | February 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17637958 | COLLISION HANDLING OF CONFIGURED GRANT BASED AUTONOMOUS UPLINK TRANSMISSIONS | February 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17625881 | INFORMATION SENDING METHOD, INFORMATION RECEIVING METHOD, APPARATUSES, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | January 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 50 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16447327 | APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING BROADCAST SIGNALS, APPARATUS FOR RECEIVING BROADCAST SIGNALS, METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING BROADCAST SIGNALS AND METHOD FOR RECEIVING BROADCAST SIGNALS | June 2019 | February 2021 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16384169 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ESTABLISHING SECURED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS USING ELECTROMAGNETIC POLARIZATION TECHNIQUES | April 2019 | October 2020 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16213624 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SELECTING A BANDWIDTH PREDICTION SOURCE | December 2018 | September 2020 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16202886 | AUTOMOTIVE RADAR USING OFDM PILOT AND DATA CARRIERS FOR INTEGRATED RADAR AND COMMUNICATIONS | November 2018 | September 2020 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16063907 | Method, System and Device for Providing a Setup of an Enhanced Call via a Wireless Local Area Network | June 2018 | October 2019 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15322935 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR FORWARDING MESSAGE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | December 2016 | September 2019 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14851404 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HYBRID TIME SYNCHRONIZATION BASED ON BROADCAST SEQUENCING FOR WIRELESS AD HOC NETWORKS | September 2015 | May 2017 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14605247 | METHOD OF IMPROVING CLOUD RESILIENCY | January 2015 | June 2018 | Allow | 41 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14594562 | SCHEDULING OF SOFTWARE PACKAGE TRANSMISSIONS ON A MULTIMEDIA BROADCAST MULTICAST SERVICE CHANNEL | January 2015 | September 2017 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14586657 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SHARING RADIO SPECTRUM | December 2014 | September 2017 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14550174 | Communication Device and Non-Transitory Computer-Readable Medium | November 2014 | June 2016 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14534709 | ASSOCIATION IN LINE-OF-SIGHT COMMUNICATION NETWORKS | November 2014 | January 2017 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14383670 | Autonomous Transport Layer Connection Setup by a Transport Layer Concentrator | September 2014 | July 2016 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14382412 | Load balancing method and system for multi-band network | September 2014 | June 2016 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14320012 | MECHANISMS OF REDUCING POWER CONSUMPTION FOR NAN DEVICES | June 2014 | May 2016 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14278431 | APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING BROADCAST SIGNALS, APPARATUS FOR RECEIVING BROADCAST SIGNALS, METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING BROADCAST SIGNALS AND METHOD FOR RECEIVING BROADCAST SIGNALS | May 2014 | May 2016 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14355747 | RELAY STATION, BASE STATION, AND BAND FREQUENCY ALLOCATION METHOD | May 2014 | April 2016 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14343232 | Method in a Base Station, a Base Station, Computer Programs and Computer Readable Means | March 2014 | March 2017 | Allow | 36 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14193803 | EDGE ROUTER SYSTEMS AND METHODS | February 2014 | October 2016 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14175942 | EFFICIENT MULTICAST TOPOLOGY CONSTRUCTION IN A ROUTED NETWORK | February 2014 | March 2017 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14130763 | TECHNIQUE FOR MAINTAINING A RADIO TIME BASE | January 2014 | November 2015 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14145683 | A MULTI-BIT INDICATOR SET ACCORDING TO FEEDBACK BASED ON AN EQUILIBRIUM LENGTH OF A QUEUE | December 2013 | May 2016 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14100974 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO OPTIMIZE POWER CONSUMPTION FOR LTE eMBMS | December 2013 | March 2016 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14097475 | MOBILE BASE STATION | December 2013 | October 2016 | Allow | 34 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14093444 | Methods and Apparatus to Convert Router Configuration Data | November 2013 | September 2015 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14006764 | COMMUNICATION PROCESSING METHOD AND BASE STATION | October 2013 | October 2016 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14036283 | SEAMLESS APPLICATION CONNECTIVITY | September 2013 | September 2015 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13967141 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR FRAME AGGREGATION TRANSMISSION OF WIRELESS NETWORK SYSTEM | August 2013 | June 2015 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13979339 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING UPLINK TIME ALIGNMENT | July 2013 | February 2017 | Allow | 43 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13993025 | METHOD FOR REPORTING CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND DEVICE THEREFOR | June 2013 | August 2015 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13905791 | COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND COMMUNICATION METHOD | May 2013 | May 2015 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13894434 | PROCESSING CIRCUITS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES AND RELATED METHODS | May 2013 | September 2015 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13785693 | IN NIC FLOW SWITCHING | March 2013 | June 2015 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner DEWAN, SANJAY K.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner DEWAN, SANJAY K works in Art Unit 2472 and has examined 33 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 24 months.
Examiner DEWAN, SANJAY K's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by DEWAN, SANJAY K receive 1.91 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 46% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DEWAN, SANJAY K is 24 months. This places the examiner in the 82% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DEWAN, SANJAY K. This interview benefit is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 35.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 60.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 21% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.