USPTO Examiner SHAW ROBERT A - Art Unit 2455

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18622730SYSTEM, METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUBSCRIBER USER INTERFACESMarch 2024April 2025Allow1200YesNo
18545666EXTENDED W3C MEDIA EXTENSIONS FOR PROCESSING DASH AND CMAF INBAND EVENTSDecember 2023September 2024Allow900YesNo
18492481SYNCHRONICITY FOR VIRTUAL REALITY/AUGMENTED REALITY INTERACTIVE SESSIONS IN WIRELESS NETWORKSOctober 2023June 2025Allow2000NoNo
18332396DISCOVERING AND PUBLISHING API INFORMATIONJune 2023June 2024Allow1300YesNo
18298071METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONTENT DELIVERY USING SERVER PUSHApril 2023April 2024Allow1200YesNo
18108536RATE LIMITER STATE CACHINGFebruary 2023March 2025Allow2510YesNo
18045108SYSTEM, METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUBSCRIBER USER INTERFACESOctober 2022December 2023Allow1500YesNo
17953842SCALABLE CROSS-BOUNDARY EDGE FRAMEWORKSeptember 2022November 2024Allow2610YesNo
17854606NATIVE ACTIVITY TRACKING USING CREDENTIAL AND AUTHENTICATION MANAGEMENT IN SCALABLE DATA NETWORKSJune 2022June 2023Allow1200NoNo
17747421LAYER 4 LOAD AWARE LOAD BALANCINGMay 2022May 2025Allow3620YesNo
17741315PHYSIOLOGICAL TEST CREDIT METHODMay 2022December 2024Allow3110YesNo
17582654METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC LOAD BALANCINGJanuary 2022March 2025Allow3820YesNo
17454884DYNAMIC TRAFFIC THROTTLINGNovember 2021December 2024Allow3710YesNo
17501048METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR JUST-IN-TIME CONTENT PREPARATION IN 5G NETWORKSOctober 2021March 2024Allow2900YesNo
17498477AUTOMATIC POLICY ENGINE SELECTIONOctober 2021May 2024Allow3110NoNo
17495299EXTENDED W3C MEDIA EXTENSIONS FOR PROCESSING DASH AND CMAF INBAND EVENTSOctober 2021September 2023Allow2300YesNo
17389718BLOCKCHAIN-BASED NETWORK DEVICE MANAGEMENT METHODS AND DEVICESJuly 2021March 2024Allow3220YesNo
17196537PATH CONGESTION NOTIFICATIONMarch 2021March 2025Allow4940YesYes
17249673SYNCHRONICITY FOR VIRTUAL REALITY/AUGMENTED REALITY INTERACTIVE SESSIONS IN WIRELESS NETWORKSMarch 2021September 2023Allow3111YesNo
17163366METHOD FOR SECURE ENROLLMENT OF DEVICES IN THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGSJanuary 2021June 2023Allow2900YesNo
16996746MULTI-THREADED SCANNING OF DISTRIBUTED FILE SYSTEMSAugust 2020March 2023Allow3100YesNo
16708106LOAD BALANCING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR AN EDGE COMPUTING NETWORKDecember 2019September 2023Abandon4520NoNo
16580499PROXIMITY BASED AUDIO COLLABORATIONSeptember 2019October 2022Allow3610YesNo
16570153MULTI-ACCESS EDGE COMPUTING (MEC) SERVICE CONTRACT FORMATION AND WORKLOAD EXECUTIONSeptember 2019October 2023Allow4931YesNo
16479513METHOD FOR OPERATING A MONITORING DEVICE FOR A DATA NETWORK OF A MOTOR VEHICLE AND MONITORING DEVICE, CONTROL UNIT AND MOTOR VEHICLEJuly 2019December 2024Abandon6050NoNo
16477340TERMINAL MANAGEMENT DEVICE AND TERMINAL DEVICEJuly 2019June 2023Allow4830YesNo
16422836MULTI-THREADED SCANNING OF DISTRIBUTED FILE SYSTEMSMay 2019May 2020Allow1200NoNo
16158213CONFIGURATION FOR IoT DEVICE SETUPOctober 2018June 2022Allow4420YesNo
16158169NATIVE ACTIVITY TRACKING USING CREDENTIAL AND AUTHENTICATION MANAGEMENT IN SCALABLE DATA NETWORKSOctober 2018May 2022Allow4430YesNo
16090828User-Device Based E-Commerce ServerOctober 2018June 2021Abandon3310NoNo
16150203METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ORCHESTRATING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN APPLICATION SERVICES THROUGH A UNIFIED CONNECTOR PLATFORMOctober 2018January 2023Allow5140YesNo
16149437CONTROLLING CAN COMMUNICATION IN A VEHICLE USING SHIFTING CAN MESSAGE REFERENCEOctober 2018September 2022Allow4820YesNo
15884023TECHNIQUES FOR MANAGING ACCESS OF USER DEVICES TO THIRD-PARTY RESOURCESJanuary 2018October 2022Allow5620YesNo
15748294DISCOVERING AND PUBLISHING API INFORMATIONJanuary 2018June 2021Abandon4050YesNo
15882553NETWORK ACCESS METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SPEECH RECOGNITION SERVICE BASED ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEJanuary 2018June 2022Allow5240YesNo
15747748NETWORK RESOURCE HANDLINGJanuary 2018February 2022Abandon4921NoNo
15746745METHODS, DEVICE, SERVER AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR PUSHING DATA IN A NETWORK ENVIRONMENT COMPRISING CACHE SERVERSJanuary 2018September 2021Allow4320NoNo
15814171METHOD FOR SECURE ENROLLMENT OF DEVICES IN THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGSNovember 2017November 2021Abandon4830NoNo
15810486SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRACKING DEVICE IDs FOR VIRTUALIZED APPLICATIONSNovember 2017January 2023Allow6041YesNo
15491605INTERNET OF THINGS PUB-SUB DATA PUBLISHERApril 2017January 2022Allow5740YesYes
15491662Methods And Systems For Content Delivery Using Server PushApril 2017January 2023Allow6040YesNo
15399290Network Routing ToolJanuary 2017July 2021Allow5430YesNo
15360926CODING FOR REAL-TIME STREAMING UNDER PACKET ERASURESNovember 2016June 2017Allow700NoNo
15341849MULTI-THREADED SCANNING OF DISTRIBUTED FILE SYSTEMSNovember 2016March 2019Allow2810YesNo
15338992MANAGING STORAGE RESOURCES IN A DISPERSED STORAGE NETWORKOctober 2016July 2021Allow5640YesNo
15338470CLUSTER SERVER MONITORING SYSTEM AND METHODOctober 2016August 2021Abandon5840YesNo
15338451UNIFIED MONITORING FLOW MAPOctober 2016June 2021Abandon5540YesNo
15338179MANAGING NOTIFICATIONS RELATED TO COLLABORATIVELY EDITED ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS BASED ON USER ROLESOctober 2016December 2020Allow5040YesNo
15282886LINKING CONTENT ITEMS AND COLLABORATION CONTENT ITEMSSeptember 2016July 2021Allow5750YesYes
15221771Device-To-Device CommunicationJuly 2016January 2020Allow4220YesNo
15187055Controlling Content DistributionJune 2016July 2017Allow1200NoNo
15162730System for Digital YearbookMay 2016April 2019Allow3410YesNo
14990683DETECTING TIME ZONES USING HISTORICAL DATE SAMPLINGJanuary 2016April 2016Allow300NoNo
14977913SHARING OF PORTABLE INITIALIZED OBJECTS BETWEEN COMPUTING PLATFORMSDecember 2015February 2016Allow200NoNo
14948439NETWORK STABILIZING TOOLNovember 2015June 2021Allow6050YesNo
14948466TRANSACTIONAL AUTOSAVE WITH LOCAL AND REMOTE LIFECYCLESNovember 2015July 2021Allow6070YesNo
14840605Data Delivery OptimizationAugust 2015May 2019Abandon4520YesNo
14794057Remote Generation and Distribution of Command Programs for Programmable DevicesJuly 2015December 2017Abandon2910NoNo
14793807DEVICE-TO-DEVICE COMMUNICATIONJuly 2015April 2016Allow900NoNo
14749072Methods to Manage Services over a Service GatewayJune 2015January 2018Allow3100NoNo
14688318METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING/RECEIVING SERVICE OF PLURALITY OF SERVICE PROVIDERSApril 2015October 2015Allow600NoNo
14587654PERFORMANCE OF HADOOP DISTRIBUTED FILE SYSTEM OPERATIONS IN A NON-NATIVE OPERATING SYSTEMDecember 2014January 2019Allow4830YesNo
14527343APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING REMOTE USER INTERFACE SERVERS USING A MULTICAST MESSAGE IN A HOME NETWORKOctober 2014June 2017Allow3120NoNo
14525072REDUNDANT DATA REQUESTS WITH CANCELLATIONOctober 2014July 2015Allow900NoNo
14502656PREDICTIVE, MULTI-LAYER CACHING ARCHITECTURESSeptember 2014June 2017Allow3200NoNo
14499697USE OF INFORMATION CHANNELS TO PROVIDE COMMUNICATIONS IN A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTSeptember 2014May 2015Allow700NoNo
14467557SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMICALLY SWITCHING BETWEEN UNICAST AND MULTICAST DELIVERY OF MEDIA CONTENT IN A WIRELESS NETWORKAugust 2014March 2019Allow5540YesNo
14328279SYSTEM FOR GENERATING ENHANCED ADVERTIZEMENTS AND METHODS FOR USE THEREWITHJuly 2014May 2018Allow4620YesNo
14309410METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DISCOVERING INTERNET PROTOCOL TELEVISION SERVICE (IPTV) PROVIDER AND IPTV SERVICE BY USING SESSION INITIATION PROTOCOLJune 2014June 2015Allow1100NoNo
14122456METHOD OF CONDITIONING COMMUNICATION NETWORK DATA RELATING TO A DISTRIBUTION OF NETWORK ENTITIES ACROSS A SPACEMarch 2014April 2019Abandon6040NoNo
14194560SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTEXT-BASED NETWORK DATA ANALYSIS AND MONITORINGFebruary 2014September 2020Abandon6060YesNo
14080331COMMUNICATION SYSTEMNovember 2013May 2016Abandon3010NoNo
14080518SHARING OF PORTABLE INITIALIZED OBJECTS BETWEEN COMPUTING PLATFORMSNovember 2013July 2017Allow4430NoNo
14080686CODING FOR REAL-TIME STREAMING UNDER PACKET ERASURESNovember 2013June 2016Allow3100NoNo
14080094SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MACHINES TO COMMUNICATE OVER THE INTERNETNovember 2013November 2018Allow6040YesNo
14080459BUS System, Method of Operating a BUS System, and Fluidic System with a BUS SystemNovember 2013October 2018Allow5940YesNo
14080569METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROBE-BASED ROUTINGNovember 2013March 2018Allow5240YesNo
14066306SYSTEM, STREAMING MEDIA OPTIMIZER AND METHODS FOR USE THEREWITHOctober 2013March 2019Abandon6060YesNo
14060778System for Digital Yearbook with AdvertisingOctober 2013February 2016Allow2820NoNo
13941327Remote Generation and Distribution of Command Programs for Programmable DevicesJuly 2013July 2015Abandon2410NoNo
13908132ERASURE CODED STORAGE AGGREGATION IN DATA CENTERSJune 2013August 2014Allow1400NoNo
13889688Content Pre-Fetching And CDN Assist Methods In A Wireless Mobile NetworkMay 2013January 2016Abandon3210NoNo
13888822TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND BANDWIDTH MANAGEMENT OF BUNDLED LINKSMay 2013June 2015Allow2520YesNo
13852796METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING QUALITY OF A MEDIA SESSIONMarch 2013June 2016Abandon3910NoNo
13852927METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MANAGING MEDIA TRAFFIC BASED ON NETWORK CONDITIONSMarch 2013November 2019Abandon6060NoYes
13723846SYSTEM FOR DIGITAL YEARBOOK WITH ADVERTISINGDecember 2012July 2013Allow710YesNo
13659763TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND BANDWIDTH MANAGEMENT OF BUNDLED LINKSOctober 2012January 2013Allow300NoNo
13631218SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING A POSTMORTEM SOCIAL FAREWELLSeptember 2012May 2016Abandon4320NoNo
13631366SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEDIA SERVICE DELIVERYSeptember 2012January 2019Abandon6050NoNo
13631044SHORT MESSAGE SERVICE (SMS) COMMUNICATION IN WIRELESS NETWORKS IN THE PACKET SWITCHED DOMAINSeptember 2012February 2016Abandon4120YesNo
13630943DETECTING TIME ZONES USING HISTORICAL DATE SAMPLINGSeptember 2012October 2015Allow3710NoNo
13578930Apparatus for Intermediating Network Operators and DevelopersAugust 2012May 2014Abandon2120NoNo
13572527USER-PERCEIVED PERFORMANCE THROUGH BROWSER HINTSAugust 2012April 2017Allow5630NoNo
13572424SYSTEM, METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUBSCRIBER USER INTERFACESAugust 2012June 2022Allow60100YesYes
13572321Systems and Methods for Providing Hot Spare NodesAugust 2012November 2020Allow6080YesYes
13520310COMMUNICATION METHOD FOR MACHINE-TYPE-COMMUNICATION AND EQUIPMENT THEREOFJuly 2012April 2017Allow5730NoNo
13537599SYSTEM FOR DIGITAL YEARBOOK WITH SOCIAL NETWORKINGJune 2012September 2012Allow310YesNo
13511166DEVICE-TO-DEVICE COMMUNICATIONJune 2012March 2015Allow3410NoNo
13526074APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR EXCHANGING DATA BETWEEN UPnP BASED DEVICESJune 2012May 2015Allow3520YesNo
13525154REDUNDANT DATA REQUESTS WITH CANCELLATIONJune 2012June 2014Allow2400NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SHAW, ROBERT A.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
3
Examiner Affirmed
3
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
6.1%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
15
Allowed After Appeal Filing
5
(33.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
10
(66.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
49.5%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner SHAW, ROBERT A - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SHAW, ROBERT A works in Art Unit 2455 and has examined 201 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 72.1%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SHAW, ROBERT A's allowance rate of 72.1% places them in the 27% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SHAW, ROBERT A receive 2.28 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 78% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SHAW, ROBERT A is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 6% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +37.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SHAW, ROBERT A. This interview benefit is in the 87% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 31.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 38% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 75.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 22.2% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 38.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 36% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 10.0% of allowed cases (in the 96% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 17% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.