Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18842027 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE | August 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18812738 | INTELLIGENT AI PROFILE SELECTION, FEEDBACK, AND ANALYSIS | August 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18629719 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ESCALATING A COLLABORATION INTERFACE | April 2024 | February 2026 | Abandon | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18617775 | METHODS, APPARATUS, AND MACHINE-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA TO MONITOR A MEDIA PRESENTATION | March 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18613042 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONSOLIDATING NETWORK TRAFFIC RULES | March 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18601502 | AUTOMATED PREVENTATIVE CONTROLS IN DIGITAL WORKFLOW | March 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18689390 | MULTIPLE INTERACTION PROCESSING | March 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18582290 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR QUERYING DATA | February 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18437427 | MITIGATING NETWORK RESOURCE CONTENTION | February 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18432124 | System And Method For Implementing Packet Processing Network Functions As A Service | February 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18544036 | Proof of work as an authorization signal | December 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18536084 | AUTOMATED ALERT RATIONALIZATION SYSTEM TO INCREASE ALERT VALUE THROUGH CORRELATION OF ALERTS | December 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18512891 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VISUALIZING MEDICAL DEVICE NETWORK AND SECURITY ATTACK | November 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18502910 | Secure Virtual Private Mobile and IP Network in Cloud | November 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18386291 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE | November 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18493351 | Security policy framework for cloud environments | October 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18473845 | Governing Access To Third-Party Application Programming Interfaces | September 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18466586 | AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE (API) ATTACK SURFACES | September 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18454932 | Zero hit analysis system | August 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18229647 | USING CONNECTION TRACKING RECORDS TO PROCESS DATA MESSAGE FLOWS AT A PNIC | August 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18229646 | MAINTAINING FIREWALL RULES AT A PNIC THAT PERFORMS FIREWALL OPERATIONS ON DATA MESSAGE FLOWS | August 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18222167 | NETWORK SYSTEM FOR PRESELECTING A SERVICE PROVIDER BASED ON PREDICTIVE INFORMATION | July 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 32 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18331038 | FLEXIBLE LABELS FOR WORKLOADS IN A NETWORK MANAGED VIRTUALIZED COMPUTING SYSTEM | June 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18036435 | METHOD FOR PROCESSING AN OPERATION INVOLVING SECRET DATA, TERMINAL, SYSTEM AND CORRESPONDING COMPUTER PROGRAM | May 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18307782 | IDENTIFICATION OF BUSY PERIODS FOR NETWORK SEGMENTS | April 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 27 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18138471 | AUTOMATIC TUNING OF MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR INCIDENT ALERT CONTROL | April 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18131089 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | April 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18295196 | ELECTRONIC MESSAGING COMMUNICATION DELIVERY METHOD | April 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 33 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18127990 | CREATING GRAPHICAL MODELS OF NETWORK SECURITY POLICIES AND DISPLAYING ON A NETWORK TOPOLOGY GRAPH | March 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18189586 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMIC CAPACITY PLANNING OF NETWORK | March 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17748834 | EFFICIENT VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS OVER BACKUPS | May 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17733017 | POLICY COMPILATION AND DISSEMINATION AS A LAYER 7 FIREWALL | April 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17714844 | ORCHESTRATED EXECUTION OF CODE BY A CLOUD-BASED DATA INTAKE AND QUERY SYSTEM | April 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 43 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17580497 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CYBER TRAINING | January 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17504228 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING REAL-TIME STREAMING DATA PROCESSING AT EDGE SERVERS | October 2021 | November 2025 | Allow | 49 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16644020 | METHOD FOR COMMUNICATING BETWEEN COMMUNICATING ELEMENTS FORMING PART OF A HOME AUTOMATION SYSTEM | March 2020 | April 2021 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16792086 | Automated Social Message Stream Population | February 2020 | March 2021 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16524463 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE BINDING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, MOBILE TERMINAL AND SERVER | July 2019 | March 2021 | Allow | 19 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16386553 | VISIBILITY MANAGEMENT ENHANCEMENT FOR MESSAGING SYSTEMS AND ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKS | April 2019 | June 2020 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16375905 | FILE TRANSMISSION IN A CLUSTER | April 2019 | August 2020 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16360389 | PROCESSING OF LIVE MULTIMEDIA CONTENT OVER A COMMUNICATION NETWORK | March 2019 | July 2020 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16242818 | EFFICIENT CREATION OF DRAFTS ASSOCIATED WITH SPONSORED CONTENT | January 2019 | April 2020 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16198350 | SOCIAL NETWORKING INFORMATION CONSUMPTION GAP RESOLUTION | November 2018 | March 2020 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16007475 | AUTOMATED SUMMARY OF DIGITAL GROUP CONVERSATIONS | June 2018 | May 2020 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16004897 | Automated Social Message Stream Population | June 2018 | September 2019 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15859550 | COOKIE BASED SESSION TIMEOUT DETECTION AND MANAGEMENT | December 2017 | September 2018 | Allow | 8 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15729863 | STREAMING OF MEDIA IN A MULTIMEDIA MESSAGING SERVICE | October 2017 | October 2019 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15670193 | Delivering Troubleshooting Support to a User of a Computing Device via a Remote Screen that Captures the User?s Interaction with the Computing Devich | August 2017 | August 2019 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15622462 | OPTIMIZING INTERNET DATA TRANSFERS USING AN INTELLIGENT ROUTER AGENT | June 2017 | November 2019 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15347860 | INTELLIGENT RENDERING OF WEBPAGES | November 2016 | January 2017 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15299619 | CLIENT-INITIATED LEADER ELECTION IN DISTRIBUTED CLIENT-SERVER SYSTEMS | October 2016 | January 2017 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15299633 | CLIENT-INITIATED LEADER ELECTION IN DISTRIBUTED CLIENT-SERVER SYSTEMS | October 2016 | January 2017 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15282765 | LOAD BALANCING METHOD, APPARATUS AND SYSTEM | September 2016 | February 2020 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15273490 | TIME AND LOCATION BASED DISTRIBUTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTENT FOR CONTENT ITEMS | September 2016 | August 2019 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15236848 | INTELLIGENT RENDERING OF WEBPAGES | August 2016 | October 2016 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15155955 | DISTRIBUTED CLIENT BASED CACHE FOR KEYS USING DEMAND FAULT INVALIDATION | May 2016 | May 2019 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 15132394 | CLIENT-INITIATED LEADER ELECTION IN DISTRIBUTED CLIENT-SERVER SYSTEMS | April 2016 | August 2016 | Allow | 4 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15062660 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUSES PERFORMING SYNCHRONIZATION OF DATA AND DATA SYNCHRONIZATION METHODS | March 2016 | January 2020 | Allow | 46 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 15048507 | IMAGE TRANSMISSION APPARATUS | February 2016 | November 2017 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15040098 | INTELLIGENT RENDERING OF WEBPAGES | February 2016 | June 2016 | Allow | 4 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 14441041 | SIP-BASED METHOD, APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR SECURE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN MTC DEVICES | May 2015 | September 2016 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14488085 | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF SESSION-AWARE LOAD BALANCING | September 2014 | April 2018 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14314660 | SOCIAL NETWORKING INFORMATION CONSUMPTION GAP RESOLUTION | June 2014 | August 2018 | Allow | 50 | 7 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14271937 | System and Method for Acceleration of a Secure Transmission Over Satellite | May 2014 | December 2016 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14147618 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING PREVALENCE OF DIGITAL CONTENT ON THE WORLD-WIDE-WEB | January 2014 | August 2016 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13705838 | SPONSORED MESSAGE NETWORK BASED ON COMMUNITY PREFERENCES | December 2012 | March 2014 | Allow | 15 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13644111 | Method and System for Managing the Transfer of Files Among Multiple Computer Systems | October 2012 | March 2015 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13596509 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACCELERATION OF A SECURE TRANSMISSION OVER SATELLITE | August 2012 | February 2014 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13534949 | PROVIDING CLIENT ACCESS TO DEVICES OVER A NETWORK | June 2012 | June 2013 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13531919 | METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR ENABLING MULTIMEDIA COMMUNICATION WITH A PRIVATE NETWORK | June 2012 | March 2013 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13523407 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REMOTE COMPUTING SESSION MANAGEMENT | June 2012 | October 2016 | Allow | 52 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13388618 | HTTP STREAMING WITH PROVED SERVICE QUALITY | April 2012 | January 2014 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13404356 | SHARING CONTENT AMONG MULTIPLE DEVICES | February 2012 | November 2012 | Allow | 9 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13402691 | MANAGING DATA CENTER RESOURCES | February 2012 | September 2017 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13276476 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR AGGREGATING DISPARATE STORAGE ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS DEVICES | October 2011 | July 2013 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13098660 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING NOTIFICATION OF NETWORK ALARMS USING A PLURALITY OF DISTRIBUTED LAYERS | May 2011 | January 2014 | Allow | 32 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13096197 | PERFORMING SELECTED OPERATIONS USING LOW POWER-CONSUMING PROCESSORS ON USER DEVICES | April 2011 | July 2016 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13096258 | TECHNIQUE OF DETECTING DENIAL OF SERVICE ATTACKS | April 2011 | March 2013 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13095781 | SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR DYNAMICALLY APPLYING SESSION CONTROL TRIGGERS TO COMMUNICATION SESSIONS | April 2011 | January 2016 | Allow | 56 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13095567 | NETWORKING SYSTEM CALL DATA DIVISION FOR ZERO COPY OPERATIONS | April 2011 | December 2013 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12727837 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MODELS IN AN INTELLIGENT WORKLOAD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | March 2010 | July 2015 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12696906 | TRAFFIC FENCING MECHANISM FOR CONTROL PLANE ENABLED NETWORKS | January 2010 | March 2012 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12657695 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REMOTE COMPUTING SESSION MANAGEMENT | January 2010 | February 2012 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12644122 | CLIENT MESSAGE DISTRIBUTION IN A DISTRIBUTED DIRECTORY BASED ON LANGUAGE AND CHARACTER SETS | December 2009 | March 2015 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12643891 | SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR MANAGING SERVICES FOR A SERVICE PROVIDER AT A DEVICE WITHIN PROXIMITY TO A LOCATION OF THE SERVICE PROVIDER, UTILIZING LOGIC OF A CENTRALIZED ENVIRONMENT | December 2009 | August 2014 | Allow | 56 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12619833 | ISCSI RECEIVER IMPLEMENTATION | November 2009 | August 2011 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12614078 | FLAGGING RESOURCE POINTERS DEPENDING ON USER ENVIRONMENT | November 2009 | August 2012 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12581446 | CELLULAR MESSAGING ALERT METHOD AND SYSTEM | October 2009 | May 2012 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12568455 | Metric Object Tracking System | September 2009 | May 2015 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12497379 | METHOD FOR SELECTING NODE IN NETWORK SYSTEM AND SYSTEM THEREOF | July 2009 | February 2013 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12517091 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VISUALIZING NETWORK SECURITY STATE | June 2009 | June 2011 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12415069 | SERVER-SIDE TRANSLATION FOR CUSTOM APPLICATION SUPPORT IN CLIENT-SIDE SCRIPTS | March 2009 | November 2015 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 12410470 | INPUT CONTENT TO APPLICATION VIA WEB BROWSER | March 2009 | May 2016 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12395545 | PLUG-IN ARCHITECTURE FOR WSD DCP OPERATIONS | February 2009 | September 2014 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12393846 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CASE-BASED SERVICE COMPOSITION | February 2009 | May 2012 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12350022 | HONORING USER PREFERENCES IN EMAIL SYSTEMS | January 2009 | September 2011 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12348694 | INTEGRATING PARTICIPANT PROFILE INFORMATION INTO REAL-TIME COLLABORATIONS | January 2009 | November 2011 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12348507 | SERVER, AND PACKET TRANSFERRING METHOD AND PROGRAM THEREFOR | January 2009 | March 2011 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12328882 | UNIFYING RELATED WEB SERVICE PORTS USING PORT POINTERS IN PROXY MEDIATION | December 2008 | December 2014 | Abandon | 60 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 12227325 | DEVICE FOR CAPTURING AN IMAGE OF THE EXTERNAL AREA OF A VEHICLE BY MEANS OF A CAMERA | November 2008 | August 2012 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MACILWINEN, JOHN MOORE JAIN.
With a 57.1% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 37.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner MACILWINEN, JOHN MOORE JAIN works in Art Unit 2454 and has examined 100 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 97.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.
Examiner MACILWINEN, JOHN MOORE JAIN's allowance rate of 97.0% places them in the 88% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by MACILWINEN, JOHN MOORE JAIN receive 3.14 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 89% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MACILWINEN, JOHN MOORE JAIN is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 24% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -3.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MACILWINEN, JOHN MOORE JAIN. This interview benefit is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 26.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 45% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 27.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 39% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 65.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 45% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 30.8% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 46.2% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 40% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 11.0% of allowed cases (in the 94% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 19% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.