Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18611935 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELECTIVE DATA ROUTING IN A DISTRIBUTED NETWORK VIA DATA THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS | March 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18485942 | DATA ACCESS SYSTEM AND METHOD, DEVICE, AND NETWORK ADAPTER | October 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18483760 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RECOMMENDING A CONFERENCE ROOM BASED ON CONTEXT AT TIME OF SCHEDULING | October 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 28 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18482682 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR USING A STREAMING STORAGE SYSTEM FOR PIPELINING DATA-INTENSIVE SERVERLESS FUNCTIONS | October 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18376938 | ACCESS POINT DEVICE USAGE-BASED RECOMMENDATION | October 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18374069 | SELF-DIAGNOSING LINK STABILIZER | September 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 29 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18469391 | AUTHENTICATED CHANNEL FOR ENCRYPTION MANAGEMENT | September 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 18468314 | SIGNALING OF PROTOCOL DATA UNIT SET INFORMATION | September 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18458580 | PROGRAMMATIC OMNICHANNEL ORCHESTRATION IN LARGE-SCALE MESSAGING SYSTEMS | August 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 18364755 | FLOW PROGRAMMING PLATFORM FOR HOME AUTOMATION | August 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18259614 | COMMUNICATION METHOD AND USER EQUIPMENT | June 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18211089 | MESSAGING SYSTEM | June 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 25 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 18325426 | INFORMATION TRANSMISSION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE | May 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18028794 | NETWORK-INITIATED SLICE-BASED SESSION HANDOVER | March 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 18245338 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MONITORING LINK STATE BETWEEN NODES | March 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18100632 | ENDPOINT ENABLED NETWORKING DEVICES AND SYSTEMS | January 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 18012775 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EDGE CONFIGURATION SERVER (ECS) LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT | December 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17926893 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING SESSION BY CONSIDERING BACKHAUL INFORMATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | November 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18050663 | PARALLEL ONLINE MEETINGS | October 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 36 | 7 | 0 | No | No |
| 17995844 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SUPPORTING VOICE HANDOVER IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | October 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17823316 | Fast Provisioning in Cloud Computing Environments | August 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 40 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17487202 | HOME APPLIANCE AND CONTROL AUTHORITY SHARING METHOD THEREOF, CONTROL TERMINAL AND STORAGE MEDIUM THEREOF | September 2021 | February 2026 | Abandon | 52 | 7 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16968357 | SERVICE LAYER METHODS FOR OFFLOADING IOT APPLICATION MESSAGE GENERATION AND RESPONSE HANDLING | August 2020 | September 2025 | Allow | 60 | 10 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16194369 | SERVICE INTERFACE TEMPLATES FOR ENTERPRISE MOBILE SERVICES | November 2018 | April 2021 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16031818 | STREAM PROCESSING WITHOUT CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING | July 2018 | April 2021 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15943925 | COGNITIVE MEETING PROXY | April 2018 | November 2020 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15702580 | MANAGING PARTICIPANTS IN AN ONLINE SESSION | September 2017 | January 2020 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 15485925 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR WIRELESS DATA TRANSMISSION, CLIENT AND SERVER CONTROLLERS | April 2017 | April 2019 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15513563 | DATA SHARING USING BODY COUPLED COMMUNICATION | March 2017 | August 2019 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 15289868 | USE OF METRICS TO CONTROL THROTTLING AND SWAPPING IN A MESSAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM | October 2016 | February 2019 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15284618 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ENERGY AWARE GAS LEAK DETECTION | October 2016 | October 2019 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15218836 | INSTANT MESSAGE (IM) ROUTING TO A VIRTUAL USER CONSISTING OF A GROUP OF POSSIBLE SUB-USERS ASSOCIATED WITH A COMMON IM IDENTITY | July 2016 | April 2021 | Allow | 57 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15109260 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ALLOCATING RESOURCES TO RESOURCE CONSUMERS IN A CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT | June 2016 | September 2019 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15067911 | RUNTIME TUPLE ATTRIBUTE COMPRESSION | March 2016 | March 2017 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14993334 | AUDIO-VIDEO DATA SWITCHING AND VIEWING SYSTEM | January 2016 | January 2019 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14511183 | Instant Message User Management | October 2014 | September 2017 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14468116 | NETWORK FUNCTION VIRTUALIZATION INFRASTRUCTURE POD IN A NETWORK ENVIRONMENT | August 2014 | January 2018 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14131841 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR WIRELESS DATA TRANSMISSION, CLIENT AND SERVER CONTROLLERS | January 2014 | January 2017 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 14021961 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ACCESS TO INTERNET SITES | September 2013 | September 2016 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13808812 | SYSTEM FOR DISPLAYING A MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC RESULT | August 2013 | May 2016 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13867169 | RUNTIME TUPLE ATTRIBUTE COMPRESSION | April 2013 | January 2016 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13867211 | COMPILE-TIME TUPLE ATTRIBUTE COMPRESSION | April 2013 | May 2016 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13867289 | DYNAMICALLY AFFINITIZING USERS TO A VERSION OF A WEBSITE | April 2013 | April 2017 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13880504 | MASTER DEVICE, INTEGRATED SERVICE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, AND INTEGRATED SERVICE MANAGEMENT METHOD | April 2013 | February 2016 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13843412 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STREAMING MEDIA | March 2013 | June 2019 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13785879 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LEVERAGING OVERLAPPING GROUP AREAS | March 2013 | December 2015 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13785741 | SYSTEMS, METHODS AND ALGORITHMS FOR LOGICAL MOVEMENT OF DATA OBJECTS | March 2013 | March 2016 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 13680319 | METHOD OF USING APPLICATION, GATEWAY USING THE METHOD, TERMINAL USING THE METHOD, AND TERMINAL SYSTEM USING THE METHOD | November 2012 | February 2017 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 13648623 | Managing Computer Network Resources | October 2012 | January 2017 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 13595097 | Re-Ordering of iFrame Execution to Reduce Network Activity Window | August 2012 | December 2015 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13584024 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM | August 2012 | August 2016 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13553722 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING PERSONALIZED SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAMMING | July 2012 | October 2013 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13524409 | REQUESTING OFFLINE PROFILE DATA FOR ONLINE USE IN A PRIVACY-SENSITIVE MANNER | June 2012 | August 2012 | Allow | 2 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13447543 | CLIENT SERVER SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXECUTING AN APPLICATION UTILIZING DISTRIBUTED OBJECTS | April 2012 | August 2015 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13413835 | SELECTIVE COMPUTATION USING ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS | March 2012 | March 2016 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 13403841 | AUDIO-VIDEO DATA SWITCHING AND VIEWING SYSTEM | February 2012 | October 2015 | Allow | 44 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13352816 | METHOD AND APPARATUS TO DETERMINE BROADCAST CONTENT AND SCHEDULING IN A BROADCAST SYSTEM | January 2012 | May 2014 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13349252 | Network Resource Access Using Social Networks | January 2012 | September 2014 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13323155 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING MOBILE AND OTHER INTERMITTENT CONNECTIVITY IN A COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT | December 2011 | March 2015 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 13316509 | PROCESSING RECURRING EVENTS WITHIN PERSONAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CLIENTS | December 2011 | May 2012 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 13140519 | SYSTEM FOR MANAGING WAKEUP AND SLEEP EVENTS OF COMPUTERS CONNECTED TO A MOTOR VEHICLE CAN NETWORK | October 2011 | January 2015 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13240783 | ARCHIVE CONTROL FOR TEXT MESSAGES | September 2011 | November 2014 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13240718 | DATA TRANSFER CONTROLLING APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHOD | September 2011 | September 2013 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13112540 | NETWORK SYSTEM EXTENSIBLE BY USERS | May 2011 | July 2012 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13108063 | TRANSPARENT REDIRECTION OF RESOURCE REQUESTS | May 2011 | March 2012 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 13049042 | SERVICE PROVIDING SYSTEM, A VIRTUAL MACHINE SERVER, A SERVICE PROVIDING METHOD, AND A PROGRAM THEREOF | March 2011 | February 2014 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13049796 | AUTOMATIC REGISTRATION OF DEVICES | March 2011 | July 2015 | Allow | 52 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13030960 | DIGITAL SECURITY CAMERA | February 2011 | April 2014 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12979356 | UNIFIED ACCESS TO RESOURCES | December 2010 | July 2016 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12978814 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING A STORAGE NETWORK TO REDUCE POWER CONSUMPTION | December 2010 | January 2016 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12979112 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LOAD BALANCING IN MULTI-LEVEL DISTRIBUTED COMPUTATIONS | December 2010 | June 2014 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12979144 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING MULTI-LEVEL DISTRIBUTED COMPUTATIONS | December 2010 | March 2016 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 12979222 | PERFORMING DEPENDENCY ANALYSIS ON NODES OF A BUSINESS APPLICATION SERVICE GROUP | December 2010 | June 2016 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 12979255 | PERFORMING PREDICTIVE MODELING OF VIRTUAL MACHINE RELATIONSHIPS | December 2010 | June 2016 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12975027 | METHOD AND APPARATUS TO DETERMINE BROADCAST CONTENT AND SCHEDULING IN A BROADCAST SYSTEM | December 2010 | September 2011 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12947802 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING PERSONALIZED SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAMMING | November 2010 | October 2013 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12907900 | AUTOMATIC HARDWARE FAILURE DETECTION AND RECOVERY FOR DISTRIBUTED MAX SESSIONS SERVER | October 2010 | August 2011 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12789450 | MANAGING COMPUTER NETWORK RESOURCES | May 2010 | October 2011 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 12713508 | MOBILE PRIVATE ASSISTED LOCATION TRACKING | February 2010 | March 2015 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 12712983 | Methods and Apparatus for Enhanced Overlay State Maintenance | February 2010 | October 2015 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 12711439 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR USER INFORMATION PROCESSING AND RESOURCE RECOMMENDATION IN A NETWORK ENVIRONMENT | February 2010 | December 2012 | Allow | 34 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 12684348 | COOPERATIVE NETWORK FOR MOBILE INTERNET ACCESS | January 2010 | September 2014 | Allow | 56 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12684365 | COOPERATIVE NETWORK FOR MOBILE INTERNET ACCESS | January 2010 | June 2014 | Allow | 54 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12624522 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC SPEED DOWNSHIFT FOR A TWO PAIR CABLE | November 2009 | March 2011 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12585320 | MANAGEMENT DEVICE, MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM FOR SYNCHRONIZING INFORMATION FROM MANAGEMENT DEVICES | September 2009 | October 2012 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12511265 | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF PROVIDING ACTIVE WEB USER INTERFACE | July 2009 | June 2011 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12510967 | DISCERNING USE OF SIGNATURES BY THIRD PARTY VENDORS | July 2009 | May 2011 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12501890 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR NETWORK DESIGN | July 2009 | April 2012 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12485644 | SOFTWARE DOWNLOADING USING A TELEVISION BROADCAST CHANNEL | June 2009 | March 2011 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12312621 | CONTRIBUTION AWARE PEER-TO-PEER LIVE STREAMING SERVICE | May 2009 | September 2014 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 12312319 | CONTRIBUTION AWARE PEER-TO-PEER LIVE STREAMING SERVICE | May 2009 | September 2014 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 12312230 | METHOD FOR SYNCHRONISING SCENE DATA FILES AND MEDIA DATA FLOWS IN AN UNIDIRECTIONAL BROADCAST SYSTEM | April 2009 | September 2011 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12442813 | GREETING CARD INCORPORATING AN IMAGING DEVICE | March 2009 | April 2012 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12392420 | ADVERTISEMENT BLOCKING IN IMS NETWORKS | February 2009 | October 2012 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12390614 | PROCESS MAPPING IN PARALLEL COMPUTING | February 2009 | December 2011 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 12368014 | PANORAMIC CAMERA WITH MULTIPLE IMAGE SENSORS USING TIMED SHUTTERS | February 2009 | January 2013 | Allow | 47 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 12363711 | System and Method for User Behavioral Management in a Computing Environment | January 2009 | September 2014 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 12344692 | PROCESSING RECURRING EVENTS WITHIN PERSONAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CLIENTS | December 2008 | October 2011 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 12332196 | TECHNIQUE FOR ADDRESSING A CLUSTER OF NETWORK SERVERS | December 2008 | March 2011 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12313274 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF CREATING A VIRTUAL WINDOW | November 2008 | June 2013 | Allow | 55 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BLAIR, DOUGLAS B.
With a 33.3% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 35.6% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner BLAIR, DOUGLAS B works in Art Unit 2454 and has examined 152 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 99.3%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.
Examiner BLAIR, DOUGLAS B's allowance rate of 99.3% places them in the 93% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by BLAIR, DOUGLAS B receive 2.89 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 84% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BLAIR, DOUGLAS B is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -2.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BLAIR, DOUGLAS B. This interview benefit is in the 9% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 29.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 56% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 46.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 107.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 86.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 80% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 35.9% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 54.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 55% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 11.2% of allowed cases (in the 94% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 19% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.