Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17254063 | METHOD OF CONFIGURING A CENTRAL CONTROL UNIT BELONGING TO A HOME AUTOMATION SYSTEM | December 2020 | April 2023 | Abandon | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17014018 | METHOD, SYSTEM, AND DEVICE FOR ADAPTIVE DETERMINATION OF NETWORK SLICE CONFIGURATION AND RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS | September 2020 | October 2022 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16905053 | Deriving Mobile Application Usage from Network Traffic | June 2020 | January 2021 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16801074 | METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR MANAGING INTEGRATION OF A THIRD PARTY RESOURCE IN A GROUP-BASED COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | February 2020 | March 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16725692 | REPORTING PLATFORM SYSTEM | December 2019 | August 2024 | Allow | 56 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16726111 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLEMENTING SET-TOP BOX PROCESSING WITH ADDITIONAL PROCESSOR RESOURCES | December 2019 | March 2023 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16723277 | METHODS, SYSTEM, ARTICLES OF MANUFACTURE, AND APPARATUS TO MANAGE TELEMETRY DATA IN AN EDGE ENVIRONMENT | December 2019 | February 2024 | Abandon | 50 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16720117 | DISTRIBUTED DATA TRANSFER CONTROL FOR REDUCING A VOLUME OF DATA RETAINED BY A MOBILE TERMINAL | December 2019 | February 2022 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16595764 | VEHICLE SOFTWARE CHECK | October 2019 | October 2021 | Abandon | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16242874 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RECEIVING AND PROCESSING A SIGNAL WITHIN A TCP/IP PROTOCOL STACK | January 2019 | June 2023 | Allow | 53 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16195099 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING MULTIMEDIA SERVICES | November 2018 | October 2021 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16192352 | MESSAGING SYSTEM FOR REVIEW DATA | November 2018 | August 2022 | Allow | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15774032 | ALARM INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER STORAGE MEDIUM | May 2018 | September 2021 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15956422 | Home Dialysis Management Using a Connected Health System Network | April 2018 | September 2020 | Abandon | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15894628 | SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM THAT ESTABLISH A COMMUNICATION PATH BETWEEN A MOBILE DEVICE AND A NON-MOBILE DEVICE | February 2018 | July 2023 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15893824 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTION OF POTENTIAL SPAM ACTIVITY DURING ACCOUNT REGISTRATION | February 2018 | April 2021 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15889237 | OPTIMIZING CLOUD RESOURCES FOR ABR SYSTEMS | February 2018 | July 2022 | Abandon | 54 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15858860 | MANAGING IDLE AND ACTIVE SERVERS IN CLOUD DATA CENTERS | December 2017 | June 2020 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15846835 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INVISIBLE IDENTIFICATION OF AGENTS PARTICIPATING IN ON-LINE COMMUNICATION SESSIONS | December 2017 | March 2021 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15845346 | CONDITIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF A SERVICE | December 2017 | July 2022 | Allow | 55 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15814671 | EMAIL STREAMING RECORDS | November 2017 | May 2023 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15813289 | APPLICATION BUFFERING OF PACKETS BY FOG COMPUTING NODE FOR DETERMINISTIC NETWORK TRANSPORT | November 2017 | August 2020 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15721590 | MESSAGING SYSTEM FOR ORGANIZATIONS | September 2017 | August 2022 | Allow | 58 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15719306 | ELECTRONIC AND MOBILE PLATFORM TO CREATE, STORE AND EXCHANGE BUSINESS CARDS | September 2017 | September 2019 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15712419 | FILE DELIVERY METHOD, APPARATUS AND SYSTEM | September 2017 | December 2020 | Abandon | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15685685 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING DIRECT SERVER RETURN LOAD BALANCING USING LOOPBACK INTERFACE IN VIRTUAL NETWORK ENVIRONMENT | August 2017 | March 2021 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15684719 | HYBRID APPROACH WITH CLASSIFICATION FOR NAME RESOLUTION AND PRODUCER SELECTION IN ICN | August 2017 | July 2021 | Abandon | 47 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15679862 | METHODS AND APPARATUS TO GENERATE REFERENCE SIGNATURES FROM STREAMING MEDIA | August 2017 | September 2021 | Allow | 49 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15678945 | DERIVING MOBILE APPLICATION USAGE FROM NETWORK TRAFFIC | August 2017 | May 2020 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15674169 | MOBILE-OPTIMIZED FILE TRANSFER MECHANISM BASED ON QR CODE | August 2017 | December 2020 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15671687 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FAST PLAY BACK OF RECORDED DATA | August 2017 | August 2020 | Allow | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15668166 | Emotional Support System | August 2017 | September 2019 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15641261 | DOWNLOADING OF SERVER-BASED CONTENT THROUGH PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKS | July 2017 | September 2022 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15474366 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ACHIEVING SESSION STICKINESS FOR STATEFUL CLOUD SERVICES WITH NON-STICKY LOAD BALANCERS | March 2017 | June 2021 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15474526 | SYSTEM, APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR AUTONOMOUS MESSAGING INTEGRATION | March 2017 | February 2022 | Abandon | 59 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15472374 | MANAGING IDLE AND ACTIVE SERVERS IN CLOUD DATA CENTERS | March 2017 | July 2020 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15473492 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NOTIFICATION DELIVERY | March 2017 | August 2023 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15473440 | PROCESSING MESSAGES FOR AN APPLICATION RUNNING ON A COMPUTER EXTERNAL TO A COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT UNIT (CMU) | March 2017 | June 2020 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15473378 | ENGAGED MICRO-INTERACTIONS ON DIGITAL DEVICES | March 2017 | February 2020 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15514738 | STREAMING SERVICE DATA RECEIVING DEVICE AND METHOD IN MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR SUPPORTING PLURALITY OF RADIO ACCESS INTERFACES | March 2017 | June 2021 | Allow | 51 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15470897 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PROCESSING MEDIA DATA | March 2017 | December 2019 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15467528 | PHOTO STIMULUS BASED ON PROJECTED GAPS/INTEREST | March 2017 | November 2020 | Abandon | 44 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15409704 | MANAGEMENT APPARATUS FOR MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT | January 2017 | October 2020 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15405455 | PREDICTING A USER EXPERIENCE METRIC FOR AN ONLINE CONFERENCE USING NETWORK ANALYTICS | January 2017 | February 2021 | Abandon | 49 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15389961 | GATEWAY ASSISTED DIAGNOSTICS AND REPAIR | December 2016 | September 2021 | Allow | 56 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15389958 | TECHNIQUES FOR GROUP MESSAGE THREAD LINK JOINING | December 2016 | April 2021 | Abandon | 52 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15388477 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING CONTENT | December 2016 | November 2021 | Abandon | 59 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15385702 | DATA TRANSMISSION FOR DATA REPLICATION SYSTEM | December 2016 | February 2022 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15384667 | NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM, METHOD, SYSTEM, AND APPARATUS FOR EXCHANGING MESSAGE | December 2016 | January 2021 | Allow | 49 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15385315 | RECIPIENT DEVICE PRESENCE ACTIVITY MONITORING FOR A COMMUNICATIONS SESSION | December 2016 | February 2023 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15385015 | CLIENT-SIDE ACK REGULATION BASED ADAPTIVE STREAMING METHOD AND APPARATUS | December 2016 | April 2019 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15379867 | AUTOMATIC SUMMARIZATION OF EMAILS AND GENERATION OF SUBJECT LINES | December 2016 | April 2021 | Abandon | 52 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15342123 | GROUP-BASED NETWORK EVENT NOTIFICATION | November 2016 | April 2023 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner KHAKURAL, SUJANA.
With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 71.4% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner KHAKURAL, SUJANA works in Art Unit 2453 and has examined 53 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 60.4%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 45 months.
Examiner KHAKURAL, SUJANA's allowance rate of 60.4% places them in the 22% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by KHAKURAL, SUJANA receive 3.70 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 94% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KHAKURAL, SUJANA is 45 months. This places the examiner in the 14% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +46.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by KHAKURAL, SUJANA. This interview benefit is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 16.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 13.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 80.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 64% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 77.8% of appeals filed. This is in the 69% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 42.9% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 15% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 20% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.