Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18909312 | TRANSMISSION METHOD, RECEPTION METHOD, TRANSMISSION APPARATUS, AND RECEPTION APPARATUS | October 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18904548 | REAL-TIME TRANSPORT (RTP) HEADER EXTENSION BINDING AND RTP HEADER EXTENSION FOR IN-BAND DELAY MEASUREMENT ON EITHER END DEVICE | October 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18828971 | System and Method for MAC Scalability and Host Mobility with Layer-3 Optimized Integrated Routing and Bridging (IRB) | September 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18787779 | SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC MOBILE APPLICATION SECURITY ASSESSMENT AND METHOD THEREOF | July 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18786283 | GEOFENCING FOR INTERNET-OF-THINGS DEVICES | July 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18780348 | KEY AND COUNTER MANAGEMENT IN WIRELESS SYSTEMS | July 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18738388 | ORACLE-DRIVEN BLOCKCHAIN | June 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18717954 | BLOCKCHAIN SCRIPT ENGINE | June 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18678599 | MANAGING INPUT DATA ATTACK RESISTANT INFERENCE MODELS | May 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18630196 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SENSOR-AGNOSTIC REPRESENTATION OF HUMAN PRESENCE INFORMATION | April 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18625369 | MESSAGE VERIFICATION FOR VEHICLE ECUS | April 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18609497 | EFFICIENT DISTRIBUTION OF MULTI-DESTINATION PACKETS IN AN OVERLAY NETWORK | March 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18604244 | AUGMENTED REALITY GLASSES FOR IRIS-RECOGNITION-BASED AUTHENTICATION | March 2024 | March 2026 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18599078 | Universal Medical Health Records | March 2024 | March 2026 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18595812 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROCESSING DATA REQUESTS | March 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18444572 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ASSESSING COMMUNICATION RESOURCES | February 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18427542 | BENIGN NETWORK ENTITIES BASED MALICIOUS CAMPAIGN SIGNATURE GENERATION | January 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18425095 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED AUTOMATED EVENT LOG MAPPING | January 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18419523 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND MEDIA FOR DELIVERING MANIFESTLESS STREAMING MEDIA CONTENT | January 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18415514 | COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND COMMUNICATION METHOD | January 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18411173 | COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM STORING DATA MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, DATA MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND DATA MANAGEMENT APPARATUS | January 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18410398 | INTERNET OF THINGS END-TO-END SERVICE LAYER QUALITY OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT | January 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18391287 | PROTECTION OF AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE | December 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18513455 | INTERACTIVE NOTIFICATION PANELS IN A COMPUTING SYSTEM | November 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18512095 | ENFORCEMENT OF FACTORY-PROVISIONED GEOGRAPHIC RESTRICTIONS ON THE OPERATION OF AN IHS | November 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18388781 | VERIFIER GENERATED COMMON REFERENCE STRING FOR ZERO-KNOWLEDGE PROOFS | November 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18496014 | PROVIDING SURVIVABLE CALLING AND CONFERENCING | October 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18376384 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURE PROVISIONING OF ACCESS TO TIERED DATABASES | October 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18373728 | TERMINAL AND AUTHENTICATION METHOD | September 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18468389 | DETERMINING CONTEXTUALLY RELEVANT APPLICATION TEMPLATES ASSOCIATED WITH ELECTRONIC MESSAGE CONTENT | September 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18354468 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR VOICE TRANSFORMATION, AUTHENTICATION, AND METADATA COMMUNICATION | July 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18192950 | ESTABLISHING CRYPTOGRAPHIC KEY FOR APPLICATIONS | March 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17899840 | TELEMETRY REDUNDANT MEASUREMENT AVOIDANCE PROTOCOL | August 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17797340 | A METHOD, A SYSTEM AND A BIOMETRIC SERVER FOR CONTROLLING ACCESS OF USERS TO DESKTOPS IN AN ORGANIZATION | August 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17851956 | DEVICE ACCESS CONTROL | June 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17675254 | SECURE COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE USING STATE MACHINES | February 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17460536 | IN-BAND CONTROL PLANE | August 2021 | September 2025 | Allow | 49 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16797819 | TRANSMISSION PARAMETER DETERMINATIONS USING ONE OR MORE NEURAL NETWORKS | February 2020 | November 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15073011 | WEB BASED EXTRANET ARCHITECTURE PROVIDING APPLICATIONS TO NON-RELATED SUBSCRIBERS | March 2016 | June 2017 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14954081 | PARTITIONING DIGITAL MEDIA FOR CONSUMPTION | November 2015 | August 2016 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14525818 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF SUPPORTING CONSTRUCTIVE DISCOURSE ON COMPUTERS AND MOBILE DEVICES | October 2014 | October 2015 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14169888 | RESOURCE RECOMMENDATION, REUSE AND OPTIMIZATION THROUGH COMMON CONTEXT | January 2014 | March 2016 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14150781 | APPLICATION LEVEL MIRRORING IN DISTRIBUTED OVERLAY VIRTUAL NETWORKS | January 2014 | September 2017 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14049361 | WEB BASED EXTRANET ARCHITECTURE PROVIDING APPLICATIONS TO NON-RELATED SUBSCRIBERS | October 2013 | December 2015 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13758842 | USER AS AN END POINT FOR PROFILING AND OPTIMIZING THE DELIVERY OF CONTENT AND DATA IN A WIRELESS NETWORK | February 2013 | January 2016 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13713077 | Device Commissioning | December 2012 | November 2015 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13459430 | RESOURCE PLACEMENT IN NETWORKED CLOUD BASED ON RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS | April 2012 | December 2016 | Allow | 55 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11915871 | COMMUNICATION DEVICE PROVIDED WITH ARP FUNCTION | November 2007 | May 2011 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11395608 | Methods and apparatus for dynamic presentation of advertising, factual, and informational content using enhanced metadata in search-driven media applications | March 2006 | July 2015 | Abandon | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 10678391 | NETWORK MEASUREMENT CONFIGURATION APPARATUS | October 2003 | March 2011 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner WHIPPLE, BRIAN P.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner WHIPPLE, BRIAN P works in Art Unit 2447 and has examined 14 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 85.7%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.
Examiner WHIPPLE, BRIAN P's allowance rate of 85.7% places them in the 63% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by WHIPPLE, BRIAN P receive 2.71 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 80% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WHIPPLE, BRIAN P is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 21% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -28.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WHIPPLE, BRIAN P. This interview benefit is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 22.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 7.1% of allowed cases (in the 89% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 19% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.