Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18438810 | System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Detecting an Anomaly in Network Activity | February 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18402359 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIA FOR PRESERVING NETWORK BANDWIDTH DURING NETWORK ADDRESS TRANSLATION (NAT) DEVICE UNAVAILABILITY OR AFTER NAT DEVICE REBOOT | January 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18536425 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PRIORITIZING FAULT MANAGEMENT SESSIONS, Y.1731 SESSIONS, AND/OR ASSOCIATED FAULT REPORTING | December 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18478883 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ERROR CODE ANALYTICS IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS | September 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18269009 | WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM | June 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18132519 | MULTIPLANE LOAD BALANCING | April 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17985177 | Mesh network system and communication method of the same having data flow transmission sorting mechanism | November 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16525233 | Dynamic Discovery of Available Storage Servers | July 2019 | March 2021 | Allow | 20 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16237351 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING ROBOTICS FRAMEWORKS | December 2018 | March 2021 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner TALIOUA, ABDELBASST works in Art Unit 2445 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 26 months.
Examiner TALIOUA, ABDELBASST's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by TALIOUA, ABDELBASST receive 2.50 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 73% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by TALIOUA, ABDELBASST is 26 months. This places the examiner in the 75% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 15% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 18% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.