Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18773057 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ACCESS VALIDATION USING DISTRIBUTED LEDGER IDENTITY MANAGEMENT | July 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18385386 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING AND MANAGING VIRTUAL REALITY IDENTIFICATION ON BASIS OF REAL-WORLD PERSONAL INFORMATION | October 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18096040 | CONFIGURABLE CRYPTOGRAPHIC DEVICE | January 2023 | February 2024 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17956591 | Network Attack Detection Method and Apparatus | September 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17779662 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION STREAMS | May 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17661922 | SECURELY RESPONDING TO QUERIES INVOLVING MOBILE VIRTUAL NETWORK OPERATORS ON A MOBILE NETWORK | May 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17660162 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLASSICAL-QUANTUM ENCRYPTION AND DECRYPTION | April 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17708893 | COMMAND LINE PARSING FOR CLASSIFICATION OF PROCESS START ALERTS | March 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17667292 | ORCHESTRATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT MANAGEMENT | February 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17589893 | IMPLEMENTING ENHANCED COMPUTER SECURITY STANDARD FOR SECURE CRYPTOGRAPHIC KEY STORAGE USING A SOFTWARE-BASED KEYSTORE | February 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17583880 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DIGITAL PROOF GENERATION | January 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17581323 | PREVENTING MALICIOUS PROCESSES BY VALIDATING THE COMMAND AUTHORITY OF COMMANDS BETWEEN NETWORK EQUIPMENT | January 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17581070 | PARALLEL TOKENIZATION OF FLOATING POINT INFORMATION IN A DISTRIBUTED NETWORK ENVIRONMENT | January 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17580250 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A QUANTUM PROXY SERVER HANDOVER MECHANISM | January 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17596760 | SUPPORT DEVICE, SUPPORT METHOD, PROGRAM, AND SUPPORT SYSTEM | December 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17521936 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTHORIZING APPLIANCE ACCESS | November 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17496397 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICATION IN A CONTENT-ADDRESSABLE PEER-TO-PEER STORAGE NETWORK | October 2021 | October 2024 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17494716 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONDUCTING REMOTE ATTESTATION | October 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17382181 | METHOD FOR PROVIDING REMOTE SERVICE CAPABLE OF MULTILINGUAL INPUT AND SERVER PERFORMING THE SAME | July 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17343103 | SYSTEM FOR IMAGE/VIDEO AUTHENTICITY VERIFICATION | June 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17331194 | Source Code Trustworthiness Assessment | May 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17241823 | Fingerprint-Based Device Authentication | April 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17195778 | DEVICES AND METHODS TO VALIDATING MULTIPLE DIFFERENT FACTOR CATEGORIES | March 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17186783 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ACCESS VALIDATION USING DISTRIBUTED LEDGER IDENTITY MANAGEMENT | February 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17185622 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SHARING DATA BASED ON BLOCKCHAIN NETWORK, DEVICE, AND MEDIUM | February 2021 | December 2023 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17182660 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MALICIOUS URL PATTERN DETECTION | February 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 50 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17179562 | QUANTUM COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM USING PULSE DIVIDER AND ASSOCIATED METHODS | February 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17163172 | SECURED CODE PACKAGE FOR BROWSER PLUGIN | January 2021 | October 2023 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17152549 | USB-BASED AUTHENTICATION DEVICE | January 2021 | May 2024 | Abandon | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17144889 | VULNERABILITY DASHBOARD AND AUTOMATED REMEDIATION | January 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17116354 | Context Based Privacy Risk Footprint and Incident Protection | December 2020 | November 2024 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17113037 | METHOD AND INTRUSION DETECTION UNIT FOR VERIFYING MESSAGE BEHAVIOR | December 2020 | March 2025 | Abandon | 52 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17085453 | FRAUDULENT CALL MONITORING | October 2020 | January 2025 | Allow | 50 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17081662 | METHOD OF SECONDARY DEVICE REAL-TIME UTILIZATION, TRANSIENCE, AND DATA MOVEMENT IN THZ-ENABLED DEVICES | October 2020 | July 2024 | Allow | 45 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17063317 | SYSTEM FOR GENERATING RESPONSIVE ACTIONS BASED ON UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH IMITATION NETWORKS | October 2020 | September 2023 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17024850 | POLICY-BASED DATA MIGRATION | September 2020 | August 2024 | Abandon | 47 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16929547 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR FILTERING DATABASE QUERIES | July 2020 | September 2023 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16925357 | ANONYMISING ROBOTIC DATA | July 2020 | May 2025 | Allow | 59 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16946470 | SECURE COMMUNICATIONS OVER COMPUTER BUSES | June 2020 | November 2023 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16776877 | GENERATING AND MONITORING FICTITIOUS DATA ENTRIES TO DETECT BREACHES | January 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 50 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16545952 | PRIVATE INFORMATION DETECTOR FOR DATA LOSS PREVENTION | August 2019 | September 2023 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16439503 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF EXECUTING, CONFIRMING AND STORING A TRANSACTION IN A SERVERLESS DECENTRALIZED NODE NETWORK | June 2019 | November 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16428285 | ANONYMOUS DATABASE RATING UPDATE | May 2019 | June 2023 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16360510 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | March 2019 | May 2023 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16279674 | APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR RELEASING RECEIVED COMMAND DATA | February 2019 | April 2023 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16143814 | TECHNOLOGIES FOR SELECTIVELY EXCLUDING USER DATA FROM MACHINE LEARNING OPERATIONS | September 2018 | June 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16027523 | VERIFIABLE PARCEL DISTRIBUTED LEDGER SHIPPING AND TRACKING SYSTEM | July 2018 | September 2023 | Allow | 60 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner SKWIERAWSKI, PAUL J works in Art Unit 2439 and has examined 46 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 84.8%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.
Examiner SKWIERAWSKI, PAUL J's allowance rate of 84.8% places them in the 55% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by SKWIERAWSKI, PAUL J receive 2.39 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 82% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SKWIERAWSKI, PAUL J is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -3.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SKWIERAWSKI, PAUL J. This interview benefit is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 34.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 71% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 11.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 200.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.