Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19301754 | TRUSTWORTHINESS OF A VIDEO DATA STREAM | August 2025 | February 2026 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 19270384 | ITERATIVELY TRAINED MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR CONFIGURATIONS OF APPLICATION PROTECTION | July 2025 | January 2026 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 19224202 | SMART JUST-IN-TIME PRIVILEGE MANAGEMENT | May 2025 | November 2025 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 19203661 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS CONFIGURED FOR AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNING A UNIQUE IDENTIFIER TO A DETECTED DEVICE | May 2025 | August 2025 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 19088017 | METHOD FOR AUTOMATED AND SECURE MANAGEMENT OF SOFTWARE ON A PLURALITY OF COMPUTER TERMINALS WITH REAL-TIME MONITORING AND NOTIFICATIONS | March 2025 | October 2025 | Allow | 7 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 19080998 | CPE Prediction Using Banner-Prompted AI/ML Modeling | March 2025 | September 2025 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 19052665 | COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEMS CONFIGURED FOR NETWORK CHARACTERIZATION AND MANAGEMENT AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF | February 2025 | May 2025 | Allow | 3 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18880904 | DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR AUTONOMOUS THREAT RESPONSE AND SECURITY ENHANCEMENT | January 2025 | September 2025 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18988185 | COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEMS CONFIGURED FOR NETWORK CHARACTERIZATION AND MANAGEMENT BASED ON RISK SCORE ANALYSIS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF | December 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 3 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18977324 | DETECTION ENGINE HAVING RISK-BASED SEVERITY ALERTS | December 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 10 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18903573 | RISK SCORING OF CLOUD PERMISSION ASSIGNMENTS USING SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING | October 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18888941 | TECHNIQUE AND METHOD FOR DETECTION AND DISPLAY OF THE CYBERSECURITY RISK CONTEXT OF A CLOUD ENVIRONMENT | September 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18887390 | SYSTEM FOR REDUCING FALSE ALERTS FROM NETWORK DETECTION AND RESPONSE TOOL | September 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18829914 | REMOTE ATTESTATION IN NETWORK | September 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18828830 | DATA PROTECTION FOR MACHINE LEARNING MODELS TRAINED ON CLIENT DATA | September 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18812503 | COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEMS CONFIGURED FOR NETWORK CHARACTERIZATION AND MANAGEMENT AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF | August 2024 | December 2024 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18795592 | AUTOMATED DISCOVERY AND EVALUATION OF VULNERABILITY HOTSPOTS IN COMPUTER NETWORKS | August 2024 | October 2024 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18834858 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR ENHANCED SECURITY IN FEDERATED LEARNING MACHINE LEARNING OPERATIONS IN A COMMUNICATION NETWORK | July 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18785813 | COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEMS CONFIGURED FOR NETWORK CHARACTERIZATION AND MANAGEMENT BASED ON RISK SCORE ANALYSIS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF | July 2024 | November 2024 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18750328 | ZERO-KNOWLEDGE PROTECTION FOR SIDE CHANNELS IN DATA PROTECTION TO THE CLOUD | June 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18742234 | SECURITY MODEL UTILIZING MULTI-CHANNEL DATA WITH VULNERABILITY REMEDIATION CIRCUITRY | June 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18742430 | CONFERENCE SECURITY FOR USER GROUPS | June 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18672749 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING CYBERSECURITY RISKS IN MANAGED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODELS | May 2024 | December 2024 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18669528 | CYBERSECURITY ARCHITECTURES FOR MULTI-CONTEXTUAL RISK QUANTIFICATION | May 2024 | September 2024 | Allow | 4 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18667464 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURITY PROCESS ANALYSIS | May 2024 | October 2024 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18659239 | METHOD FOR OBTAINING SECURITY CLASSIFICATION RESULT AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS | May 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18656657 | CVE LABELING FOR EXPLOITS USING PROOF-OF-CONCEPT AND LLM | May 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18649633 | UNIVERSAL AUTHENTICATOR APPARATUS FOR OBTAINING HOST SERVICES | April 2024 | September 2024 | Allow | 4 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18641798 | RANSOMWARE ATTACK ONSET DETECTION | April 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18622676 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED RISK-BASED NETWORK SECURITY FOCUS | March 2024 | November 2024 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18618684 | TECHNIQUE AND METHOD FOR DETECTION AND DISPLAY OF THE CYBERSECURITY RISK CONTEXT OF A CLOUD ENVIRONMENT | March 2024 | October 2024 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18609300 | AUTOMATED PRIORITIZATION OF CYBER RISK TO DIGITAL IDENTITIES | March 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18604262 | AUTOMATED VULNERABILITY EXCEPTION PROCESS | March 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18600442 | Attack Path and Graph Creation Based on User and System Profiling | March 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18595625 | IDENTIFYING LEGITIMATE WEBSITES TO REMOVE FALSE POSITIVES FROM DOMAIN DISCOVERY ANALYSIS | March 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18584670 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING CYBERSECURITY RISKS IN MANAGED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODELS | February 2024 | May 2024 | Allow | 2 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18685322 | COMPUTER SYSTEM AND ANALYSIS METHOD FOR IMPACT OF SECURITY RISK | February 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18435762 | TECHNIQUES FOR CYBERSECURITY RISK-BASED FIREWALL CONFIGURATION | February 2024 | August 2024 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18424119 | PREDICTING ONLINE ELECTRONIC ATTACKS BASED ON OTHER ATTACKS | January 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18409361 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING PROTECTION GAP IN CYBERSECURITY | January 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18399225 | REAL-TIME MITIGATIVE SECURITY ARCHITECTURE | December 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18545761 | BEHAVIOR-BASED ASSET CLASSIFICATIONS | December 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18544071 | MULTI-LAYER APPLICATION SECURITY GRAPH FOR CLOUD-NATIVE APPLICATIONS USING RUNTIME APPLICATION TELEMETRY COLLECTED IN REAL-TIME | December 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18510913 | Cyber Vulnerability Assessment Tool Threat Assessment Heuristic | November 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18385731 | MALICIOUS HOMOGLYPHIC DOMAIN NAME GENERATION AND ASSOCIATED CYBER SECURITY APPLICATIONS | October 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18498898 | TECHNIQUE AND METHOD FOR DETECTION AND DISPLAY OF THE CYBERSECURITY RISK CONTEXT OF A CLOUD ENVIRONMENT | October 2023 | February 2024 | Allow | 4 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18498030 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTINUOUS THREAT-INFORMED EXPOSURE MANAGEMENT | October 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18485881 | PROCESS AND SYSTEM FOR SELECTABLE DATA TRANSMISSION | October 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18475012 | REAL-TIME MITIGATIVE SECURITY ARCHITECTURE | September 2023 | December 2023 | Allow | 2 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18371963 | SECURITY MODEL UTILIZING MULTI-CHANNEL DATA | September 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18370610 | CONNECTION DESTINATION MALIGNANCY DETERMINATION SYSTEM, CONNECTION DESTINATION MALIGNANCY DETERMINATION PROGRAM, AND CONNECTION DESTINATION MALIGNANCY DETERMINATION METHOD | September 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18470229 | INHERITING SECURITY RISKS FOR CLOUD ENTITIES IN A CLOUD COMPUTING SYSTEM | September 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18469159 | TECHNIQUES FOR CYBERSECURITY RISK-BASED FIREWALL CONFIGURATION | September 2023 | January 2024 | Allow | 4 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18464382 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CREDENTIAL HANDLING | September 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18464106 | TLS POLICY ENFORCEMENT AT A TUNNEL GATEWAY | September 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18279858 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR DETERMINING A VULNERABILITY OF A NETWORK NODE | August 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18455965 | AUTOMATED DEPLOYMENT OF DECOY PRODUCTION NETWORKS | August 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 25 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18447983 | AUTHENTICATION BASED ON PHYSICALLY UNCLONABLE FUNCTIONS | August 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18364828 | METHOD FOR PROVIDING REAL TIME ZERO TRUST SECURITY IN A SHARED RESOURCE NETWORK | August 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18356446 | SOFTWARE BILL OF MATERIALS AND VULNERABILITY MANAGEMENT VIA DEEP PACKET INSPECTION | July 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18352848 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REGULATING DATA COMMUNICATION | July 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18352455 | ZERO TRUST CONTINUOUS RISK FEEDBACK | July 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18259335 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED FRAUD RISK DETECTION IN A MONITORED SYSTEM | June 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18213183 | SECURITY MODEL UTILIZING MULTI-CHANNEL DATA WITH RISK-ENTITY FACING CYBERSECURITY ALERT ENGINE AND PORTAL | June 2023 | June 2024 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18206168 | NETWORK SECURITY ASSESSMENT BASED UPON IDENTIFICATION OF AN ADVERSARY | June 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18328013 | System and Method for Network Penetration Testing | June 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18203111 | PROVIDING OBFUSCATED RESULTS TO A NETWORK SCANNER | May 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18202405 | System, Method, and Computer Program Product for User Network Activity Anomaly Detection | May 2023 | April 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18202860 | SECURITY MODEL UTILIZING MULTI-CHANNEL DATA | May 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18201373 | Managed Activation of Licensed Software for Resources in Peered Networks | May 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18313883 | CYBERSECURITY SYSTEM FOR SERVICES OF INTERWORKING WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS | May 2023 | June 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18310486 | ON-PREMISES NETWORK TRAFFIC MONITORING VIA SECURITY AGENT CONFIGURED PORT MIRRORING OF ROUTER DEVICE | May 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18310337 | AUTOMATED DEPLOYMENT OF DECOY PRODUCTION NETWORKS | May 2023 | August 2023 | Allow | 3 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18305898 | System and Method for Surfacing Cyber-Security Threats with a Self-Learning Recommendation Engine | April 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18137719 | THREAT ACTIVITY STATISTICAL ANALYSIS DRIVEN ADAPTATION OF A CONTROL SPECIFICATION | April 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18191503 | VULNERABILITY SCANNING OF A REMOTE FILE SYSTEM | March 2023 | April 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18184922 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTINUOUS THREAT-INFORMED EXPOSURE MANAGEMENT | March 2023 | September 2023 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18177981 | Securing Access to Confidential Data Using a Blockchain Ledger | March 2023 | April 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18178264 | MODELING CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS AND OPERATION EFFECTIVENESS | March 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18112090 | ADAPTIVE PROTECTION MECHANISMS LOOP | February 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18158314 | SYSTEM CONFIGURED TO DETECT AND BLOCK THE DISTRIBUTION OF MALICIOUS CONTENT THAT IS ATTRIBUTABLE TO AN ENTITY | January 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18150577 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS ON DARK WEB FORUMS TO PREDICT ENTERPRISE CYBER INCIDENTS | January 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18013772 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SIMULATION OF CYBERATTACKS WITH EXECUTION CONFIRMATION | December 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18145222 | RANSOMWARE ATTACK ONSET DETECTION | December 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18077260 | METHOD OF DESIGNING ONE-WAY COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEM IN QAP-BASED HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION | December 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18077476 | INTEGRATING DATA PRIVACY INTEGRATION PROTOCOLS ACROSS SYSTEM LANDSCAPES | December 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18073289 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING ORGANIZATION DIGITAL SECURITY | December 2022 | September 2023 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17992180 | IDENTIFYING LEGITIMATE WEBSITES TO REMOVE FALSE POSITIVES FROM DOMAIN DISCOVERY ANALYSIS | November 2022 | December 2023 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17991126 | AUTOMATICALLY DETECTING VULNERABILITY REGRESSIONS | November 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17988128 | Defending Against Volumetric Attacks | November 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17986861 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF LEVEL OF SECURITY TO APPLY TO A GROUP BEFORE DISPLAY OF USER DATA | November 2022 | November 2023 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17924571 | CONTROL DEVICE AND PROGRAM VERIFICATION METHOD | November 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17966791 | System and Method for Computation of Ransomware Susceptibility | October 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17964227 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING ACCESS ANOMALIES USING NETWORK GRAPHS | October 2022 | September 2023 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17961053 | CONTENT PROTECTION SYSTEM | October 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17937821 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CRYPTOGRAPHIC AUTHENTICATION | October 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17958579 | CLOUD-BASED ORCHESTRATION OF INCIDENT RESPONSE USING MULTI-FEED SECURITY EVENT CLASSIFICATIONS | October 2022 | November 2023 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17914298 | MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USER AUTHENTICATION ON PASSWORD BASED SYSTEMS | September 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17950270 | MULTIPLE SOURCED CLASSIFICATION | September 2022 | October 2023 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17946932 | MALICIOUS HOMOGLYPHIC DOMAIN NAME GENERATION AND ASSOCIATED CYBER SECURITY APPLICATIONS | September 2022 | July 2023 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SU, SARAH.
With a 26.9% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 27.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner SU, SARAH works in Art Unit 2431 and has examined 665 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 80.9%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.
Examiner SU, SARAH's allowance rate of 80.9% places them in the 51% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by SU, SARAH receive 1.85 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 43% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SU, SARAH is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 59% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +17.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SU, SARAH. This interview benefit is in the 58% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 30.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 59% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 36.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 54% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 42.1% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 39% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.9% of appeals filed. This is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 29.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 39.8% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 3.9% of allowed cases (in the 83% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 18.2% of allowed cases (in the 93% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.