Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17247564 | SOCIAL NETWORK LIVE EVENTS | December 2020 | December 2023 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17085921 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VIEWING-SESSION CONTINUITY | October 2020 | March 2022 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17079235 | CONSUMER ELECTRONIC ENTERTAINMENT AND DISPLAY SYSTEM | October 2020 | October 2022 | Abandon | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17070144 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND MEDIA FOR STREAMING VIDEO CONTENT USING ADAPTIVE BUFFERS | October 2020 | May 2022 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17017207 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING THE REMOVAL OF A CONTROLLING DEVICE | September 2020 | November 2023 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16966260 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) BASED ENHANCED RESOLUTION CONTENT DELIVERY | July 2020 | November 2022 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16921434 | MEDIA DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS | July 2020 | August 2022 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16913991 | AUTOPLAY RECOMMENDATIONS AND SEQUENCING IN FULL SCREEN VIDEO MODE | June 2020 | April 2025 | Abandon | 58 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16599304 | SPEECH RECOGNITION FOR LOCALIZED CONTENT | October 2019 | March 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 10 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16472053 | DISPLAY DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | June 2019 | August 2023 | Abandon | 50 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16410403 | Broadcast Delivered HLS System | May 2019 | March 2024 | Allow | 59 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16230830 | OPTIMIZED AD PLACEMENT BASED ON AUTOMATED VIDEO ANALYSIS AND DEEP METADATA EXTRACTION | December 2018 | January 2025 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15991679 | WINDOW DISPLAYING NAVIGABLE PROGRAM INFORMATION | May 2018 | March 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 10 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15988572 | DELIVERY OF DIFFERENT SERVICES THROUGH CLIENT DEVICES BY VIDEO AND INTERACTIVE SERVICE PROVIDER | May 2018 | November 2023 | Abandon | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15941630 | AUTOMOTED IDENTIFICATION OF PRODUCT OR BRAND-RELATED METADATA CANDIDATES FOR A COMMERCIAL USING TEMPORAL POSITION OF PRODUCT OR BRAND-RELATED TEXT OR OBJECTS, OR THE TEMPORAL POSITION AND AUDIO, IN VIDEO FRAMES OF THE COMMERCIAL | March 2018 | May 2022 | Abandon | 50 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15676765 | Assignment of Processing Resource Based on Session Data | August 2017 | February 2023 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15262753 | METHOD FOR MANAGING THE RECOVERY OF ADVERTISING CONTENT | September 2016 | June 2019 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15110500 | METHOD FOR DISPLAYING BIT DEPTH FOR PLAYING VIDEO USING DASH | July 2016 | April 2019 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14691299 | METHOD FOR TRANSCEIVING A BROADCAST SIGNAL AND BROADCAST-RECEIVING APPARATUS USING SAME | April 2015 | October 2017 | Abandon | 29 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14675320 | VIEWING SYSTEM AND METHOD | March 2015 | June 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 13968625 | Programming User Behavior Reporting | August 2013 | December 2015 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13523682 | Interactive Ticker | June 2012 | March 2015 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13358363 | VIDEO SERVER AND STANDBY METHOD | January 2012 | December 2016 | Abandon | 59 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 12651339 | Method of Sharing Personal Media Using a Digital Recorder | December 2009 | May 2018 | Abandon | 60 | 8 | 0 | No | No |
| 12609074 | Methods, Systems, And Computer Program Products For Providing Content Synchronization Or Control Among One Or More Devices | October 2009 | July 2018 | Abandon | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner GOODARZI, NASSER MOAZZAMI.
With a 33.3% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 22.2% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner GOODARZI, NASSER MOAZZAMI works in Art Unit 2426 and has examined 25 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 24.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 50 months.
Examiner GOODARZI, NASSER MOAZZAMI's allowance rate of 24.0% places them in the 3% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by GOODARZI, NASSER MOAZZAMI receive 4.20 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 97% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by GOODARZI, NASSER MOAZZAMI is 50 months. This places the examiner in the 7% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -6.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by GOODARZI, NASSER MOAZZAMI. This interview benefit is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 0.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 7.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 45.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 66.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 71% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 14% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 18% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.