Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18639464 | Topical Content Searching | April 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18394492 | PROOF OF PLAY FOR IMAGES DISPLAYED AT ELECTRONIC DISPLAYS | December 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 16 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18348824 | INTERACTIVE PROGRAMMING GUIDE | July 2023 | March 2024 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18335057 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR LOADING AND ROLL-OFF OF REFERENCE MEDIA ASSETS | June 2023 | May 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18128913 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING MEDIA CONTENT FOR CONTINOUS WATCHING | March 2023 | May 2024 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18179323 | METHODS AND APPARATUS TO DETERMINE HEADPHONE ADJUSTMENT FOR PORTABLE PEOPLE METER LISTENING TO ENCODED AUDIO STREAMS | March 2023 | March 2024 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18111167 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING MEDIA CONTENT FOR CONTINOUS WATCHING | February 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 19 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18102573 | CONTENT PERSONALIZATION BASED ON REINFORCEMENT LEARNING | January 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18066062 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR TEXT-TO-SPEECH SCREEN READING | December 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18079675 | METHODS, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEMS TO COLLECT AUDIENCE MEASUREMENT DATA | December 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 15 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17915264 | LOW LATENCY CONTENT DELIVERY | September 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 18 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17929560 | SECURE ACCESS AND PRESENTATION OF PASSENGER-SPECIFIC INFORMATION | September 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17902762 | COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM, APPARATUS AND METHOD | September 2022 | June 2023 | Abandon | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17822318 | TRANSLATION BETWEEN A FIRST VERSION OF INTERNET PROTOCOL AND A SECOND VERSION OF INTERNET PROTOCOL WHEN AN APPLICATION LAYER GATEWAY (ALG) IS INVOLVED | August 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17891388 | Universal Mirroring Receiver | August 2022 | October 2024 | Abandon | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17883143 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM FOR DESKTOP SHARING OVER A WEB SOCKET CONNECTION IN A NETWORKED COLLABORATION WORKSPACE | August 2022 | August 2024 | Abandon | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17838552 | Adaptive Decoder-Driven Encoder Reconfiguration | June 2022 | September 2024 | Abandon | 27 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17832995 | TRANSMISSION AND CONSUMPTION OF TIME-SHIFTED CONTENT IN A ONE-WAY COMMUNICATION ENVIRONMENT | June 2022 | October 2023 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17833254 | Synchronizing Program Presentation | June 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 34 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17829831 | SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED VIDEO CREATION AND SHARING9831 | June 2022 | June 2023 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17828775 | AUTOMATED VISUAL TRIGGER PROFILING AND DETECTION | May 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 26 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17751889 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR OPERATING A GROUP WATCHING SESSION | May 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 27 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17775640 | ENGAGEMENT ESTIMATION APPARATUS, ENGAGEMENT ESTIMATION METHOD AND PROGRAM | May 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17736457 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR QUANTIFYING EFFECTS OF A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK SERVER ON STREAMING-MEDIA QUALITY AND PREDICTING ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS | May 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17727500 | DIRECT MEDIA CONNECTION OF A REAR-SEAT ENTERTAINMENT UNIT | April 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 35 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17720995 | PREDICTING FUTURE VIEWERSHIP | April 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17717017 | METHODS AND APPARATUS TO DETERMINE DIGITAL AUDIO AUDIENCE REACH ACROSS MULTIPLE PLATFORMS | April 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17700249 | SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR ONLINE DATA TRANSFER | March 2022 | January 2024 | Abandon | 22 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17696622 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING AUXILIARY MANIFESTS FOR MEDIA ITEMS | March 2022 | December 2023 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17567442 | PROOF OF PLAY FOR IMAGES DISPLAYED AT ELECTRONIC DISPLAYS | January 2022 | October 2023 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17538813 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR LOADING AND ROLL-OFF OF REFERENCE MEDIA ASSETS | November 2021 | January 2023 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17538740 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MIRRORING AND TRANSCODING MEDIA CONTENT | November 2021 | June 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17504801 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A DYNAMIC TIMELINE OF RELATED MEDIA CONTENT BASED ON TAGGED CONTENT | October 2021 | May 2024 | Allow | 31 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17494582 | SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT FOR MEDIA PRODUCTION USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | October 2021 | March 2024 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17487855 | Timeline for Media Content Playback | September 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 44 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17474982 | VIDEO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM DISTRIBUTING VIDEO THAT INCLUDES MESSAGE FROM VIEWING USER | September 2021 | September 2023 | Allow | 24 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17473024 | NEGATIVE SIGNAL PROBABILITY DETERMINATION AND CONTENT ITEM SELECTION | September 2021 | February 2024 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17412644 | SYNCHRONOUS CONTENT PRESENTATION | August 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 44 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17394066 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING PLAYLISTS | August 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17336416 | Consolidated Watch Parties | June 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17180176 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING QUALITY OF SERVICE WHILE STREAMING CODE-AGNOSTIC CONTENT | February 2021 | August 2024 | Abandon | 42 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17142002 | INTERACTIVE PROGRAMMING GUIDE | January 2021 | April 2023 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17125268 | IN-FLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS | December 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 39 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 16922671 | RECEPTION APPARATUS, RECEPTION METHOD, TRANSMISSION APPARATUS, AND TRANSMISSION METHOD | July 2020 | February 2025 | Abandon | 55 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16900773 | PER-VIEWER ENGAGEMENT-BASED VIDEO OPTIMIZATION | June 2020 | June 2023 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16843500 | GENERATED MESSAGING TO VIEW CONTENT ON MEDIA DEVICES | April 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 47 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16752193 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NONLINEAR VIDEO PLAYBACK USING LINEAR REAL-TIME VIDEO PLAYERS | January 2020 | June 2024 | Allow | 53 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16670954 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PRESENTING ADDITIONAL CONTENT AT A MEDIA SYSTEM | October 2019 | January 2023 | Allow | 39 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16588942 | METHOD OF ADAPTING A BIT RATE FOR A MOBILE DEVICE | September 2019 | September 2024 | Allow | 59 | 9 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16578186 | NETWORK BASED DATA TRAFFIC LATENCY REDUCTION | September 2019 | June 2024 | Allow | 57 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16572420 | USER/INTERACTION ASSOCIATION VIA A MEDIA GATEWAY | September 2019 | May 2024 | Abandon | 56 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16259946 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING VIDEOS | January 2019 | October 2023 | Allow | 57 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16017900 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PRESENTING ADDITIONAL CONTENT AT A MEDIA SYSTEM | June 2018 | October 2023 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15695580 | TOPICAL CONTENT SEARCHING | September 2017 | January 2024 | Allow | 60 | 10 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14996757 | COMPUTING SYSTEM WITH VIDEO-TAGGING ANOMALY DETECTION FEATURE | January 2016 | March 2018 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14789517 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROVIDING PRIMARY CONTENT AND SECONDARY CONTENT | July 2015 | July 2024 | Allow | 60 | 11 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14630590 | METHOD FOR CONTINUOUSLY PLAYING VIDEO CLIPS WITHOUT REGENERATION | February 2015 | July 2016 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14416349 | SOCIAL TELEVISION STATE SYNCHRONIZATION METHOD, SYSTEM AND TERMINAL | January 2015 | December 2016 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14587216 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SKIPPING OPTIMUM ADVERTISEMENTS IN CONTENT | December 2014 | August 2016 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13774773 | System For Interacting With An Electronic Program Guide | February 2013 | December 2013 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13708632 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR VIEWING DYNAMICALLY CUSTOMIZED AUDIO-VISUAL CONTENT | December 2012 | October 2018 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13466885 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LOCATING AND CAPTURING DESIRED MEDIA CONTENT FROM MEDIA BROADCASTS | May 2012 | April 2014 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12961734 | IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE SAME | December 2010 | September 2013 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12906646 | COLOR-UNEVENNESS INSPECTION APPARATUS AND METHOD | October 2010 | February 2013 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner DOSHI, AKSHAY.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner DOSHI, AKSHAY works in Art Unit 2422 and has examined 63 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 79.4%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 29 months.
Examiner DOSHI, AKSHAY's allowance rate of 79.4% places them in the 41% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by DOSHI, AKSHAY receive 3.37 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 99% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DOSHI, AKSHAY is 29 months. This places the examiner in the 45% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +15.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DOSHI, AKSHAY. This interview benefit is in the 59% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 5.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 66.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 52% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 36.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 14% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.