Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17130631 | PATHLOSS DROP TRUSTED AGENT MISBEHAVIOR DETECTION | December 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 39 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16949873 | ROUTING AGENTS WITH SHARED MAXIMUM RATE LIMITS | November 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17092685 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND MEDIA FOR PAIRING DEVICES TO COMPLETE A TASK USING AN APPLICATION REQUEST | November 2020 | April 2022 | Abandon | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17088503 | IP-Based Matching System | November 2020 | September 2021 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17082916 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING HEADER PROTECTION IN DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS | October 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17079836 | NETWORK ADDRESS TRANSLATION (NAT) TRAVERSAL AND PROXY BETWEEN USER PLANE FUNCTION (UPF) AND SESSION MANAGEMENT FUNCTION (SMF) | October 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17075397 | DATA DETERMINISTIC DELIVERABLE COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY BASED ON QOS AS A SERVICE | October 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17048110 | LOCAL SERVERS FOR MANAGING AN INTERMITTENT NETWORK | October 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17068555 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MULTIDIMENSIONAL SEARCH WITH A RESOURCE POOL IN A COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT | October 2020 | September 2021 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17061597 | APPOINTMENT MONITORING AND TRACKING SYSTEM | October 2020 | December 2021 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17039941 | PROTECTING INTEGRATION BETWEEN RESOURCES OF DIFFERENT SERVICES USING SERVICE-GENERATED DEPENDENCY TAGS | September 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16945000 | Network Directionality Mapping System | July 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16916238 | TELEMETRY-BASED NETWORK SWITCH CONFIGURATION VALIDATION | June 2020 | October 2022 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16915514 | CONFERENCING APPLICATION WITH INSTANT MESSAGING PERSONA | June 2020 | May 2023 | Allow | 35 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16889213 | Peer-to-Peer Application Layer Distributed Mesh Routing | June 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16864603 | DATA RESTORATION FOR DATACENTER FAILOVER | May 2020 | December 2021 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16810071 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DISTRIBUTION OF APPLICATION COMPUTATIONS | March 2020 | November 2021 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16643972 | METHOD OF AUTOMATIC CONFIGURATION OF NETWORK ADDRESS OF A COMMUNICATING ELEMENT FORMING PART OF A HOME-AUTOMATION SYSTEM, ASSOCIATED NETWORK INTERFACE, COMMUNICATING ELEMENT AND HOME-AUTOMATION SYSTEM | March 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16795195 | PEER-TO-PEER (P2P) DOWNLOADING | February 2020 | February 2023 | Allow | 36 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16733260 | Apparatus and method for rate management and bandwidth control | January 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16731888 | DATA STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL | December 2019 | February 2022 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16722128 | CROWDSOURCING AND ORGANIZING MULTIPLE DEVICES TO PERFORM AN ACTIVITY | December 2019 | September 2021 | Abandon | 21 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16722432 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR NETWORK-BASED TRANSFERRING COMMUNICATION SESSIONS BETWEEN ENDPOINTS | December 2019 | December 2021 | Allow | 24 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16597632 | ADAPTIVE COMPUTATION AND FASTER COMPUTER OPERATION | October 2019 | November 2021 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16475241 | PROVIDING COMMUNICATION SERVICES USING SETS OF I/O DEVICES | July 2019 | September 2021 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16449005 | METHOD FOR MANAGING COMPUTER NETWORK ACCESS | June 2019 | March 2022 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16437115 | HOME NETWORK OF CONNECTED CONSUMER DEVICES | June 2019 | February 2023 | Abandon | 44 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16436531 | PRESENCE-BASED COMMUNICATIONS IN A CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT | June 2019 | October 2021 | Allow | 28 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 16376327 | Communication Method and Apparatus | April 2019 | September 2021 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16236089 | APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE DURING THE DELIVERY OF CONTENT | December 2018 | August 2021 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15823288 | DYNAMIC QUARANTINE OF IMPAIRED SERVERS | November 2017 | March 2023 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15392530 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR POLYMORPHIC DOMAIN NAME RESOLUTION | December 2016 | June 2022 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14951689 | KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION DISTRIBUTION WITHIN A NETWORK COMPUTING SYSTEM | November 2015 | July 2022 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 14925413 | Method and System for Executing Applications Using Native Code Modules | October 2015 | July 2022 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14877298 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CACHING STREAMING MULTIMEDIA ON THE INTERNET | October 2015 | July 2016 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14621514 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING COMMUNICATION RESOURCES | February 2015 | December 2022 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14585320 | Containerizing Web Applications for Managed Execution | December 2014 | June 2023 | Abandon | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14569048 | THROTTLING CONTENT DOWNLOAD IN ADAPTIVE HTTP LIVE STREAMING | December 2014 | May 2023 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14397443 | Systems and Methods for Personalizing and/or Tailoring A Service Interface | October 2014 | October 2021 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 10601237 | INTELLIGENT NETWORK INTERFACE DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR ACCELERATED COMMUNICATION | June 2003 | November 2011 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner DENNISON, JERRY B.
With a 25.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 20.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner DENNISON, JERRY B works in Art Unit 2419 and has examined 40 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 85.0%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 27 months.
Examiner DENNISON, JERRY B's allowance rate of 85.0% places them in the 62% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by DENNISON, JERRY B receive 3.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 83% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DENNISON, JERRY B is 27 months. This places the examiner in the 70% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +9.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DENNISON, JERRY B. This interview benefit is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 14.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 42.9% of appeals filed. This is in the 10% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 66.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 71% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 14% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 17% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.