USPTO Examiner NGO ANGELIE THIEN THAN - Art Unit 2416

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18680881TRANSMISSION DEVICE, RECEPTION DEVICE, TRANSMISSION METHOD, AND RECEPTION METHOD FOR RANDOM ACCESS COMMUNICATIONMay 2024April 2025Allow1010NoNo
18601582REFERENCE SIGNAL FOR REMOTE INTERFERENCE MANAGEMENTMarch 2024April 2025Allow1300YesNo
18539039THERMAL MITIGATION IN USER EQUIPMENT HAVING MULTIPLE COMMUNICATION MODULESDecember 2023June 2025Allow1820YesNo
17911869TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATIONSeptember 2022June 2025Abandon3310NoNo
17796994TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATIONAugust 2022May 2025Abandon3310NoNo
17794294METHOD FOR ENABLING SECONDARY CELL DORMANCY FOR USER EQUIPMENT POWER SAVINGSJuly 2022April 2025Allow3320YesNo
17804543SUB-SYMBOL DISCOVERY SIGNALMay 2022December 2024Allow3110NoNo
17581935TRAINING METHOD FOR APPLICATION MOS MODEL, DEVICE, AND SYSTEMJanuary 2022June 2024Allow2910NoNo
17628616MACHINE LEARNING BASED ADAPTATION OF QOE CONTROL POLICYJanuary 2022December 2024Allow3410YesNo
17554928NETWORK PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND FAULT MANAGEMENT BASED ON WIDE AREA NETWORK LINK HEALTH ASSESSMENTSDecember 2021February 2025Allow3820NoNo
17616437METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING UPLINK SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND DEVICE THEREFORDecember 2021August 2024Allow3310YesNo
17594847PHASE TRACKING REFERENCE SIGNAL CONFIGURATION FOR A RANDOM ACCESS PROCEDURENovember 2021December 2024Abandon3720YesNo
17598417IAB NODE RELEASE PROCEDURESeptember 2021March 2025Abandon4120NoNo
17482988Automated Sensor Integration and Data CollectionSeptember 2021April 2024Allow3120NoNo
17476011RELIABILITY-BASED SERVICE CHAIN INSTANCE SELECTION IN A 5G NETWORKSeptember 2021April 2025Allow4330YesNo
17474416STREAM ALTERATIONS UNDER LIMITED BANDWIDTH CONDITIONSSeptember 2021January 2024Allow2820NoNo
17405180Network timing topology discovery and visualization using Interior Gateway ProtocolsAugust 2021January 2025Allow4130NoNo
17430896DYNAMIC RESOURCE ALLOCATION ACROSS MULTIPLE NETWORK SERVICE PROVIDERSAugust 2021March 2024Allow3120YesNo
17444793DYNAMIC TRANSMISSION RATES FOR ISOCHRONOUS STREAMINGAugust 2021December 2023Allow2820YesNo
17389587EVALUATING CELLULAR CHANNELSJuly 2021May 2024Allow3420NoNo
17381007METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SITE-SPECIFIC AND DYNAMIC BASE STATION BEAM CODEBOOK DESIGNJuly 2021October 2023Allow2710YesNo
17379972SERVICE AVAILABILITY IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMJuly 2021December 2023Abandon2910NoNo
17364466WAKE UP SIGNAL FOR BASE STATIONJune 2021March 2024Allow3230YesNo
17362618APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR POSITIONING ENHANCEMENTS WITH WAKE-UP SIGNAL (WUS) CONFIGURATIONSJune 2021August 2023Allow2610YesNo
17360001Operation, Administration, and Maintenance IOAM Packet Transmission Method and Related ApparatusJune 2021June 2025Abandon4840NoNo
17350794THERMAL MITIGATION IN USER EQUIPMENT HAVING MULTIPLE COMMUNICATION MODULESJune 2021December 2024Allow4250YesNo
17343203WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMJune 2021July 2024Abandon3720YesNo
17334318COMMUNICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF DATA TRANSMISSIONMay 2021November 2023Allow2910NoNo
17331620METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIA FOR DETERMINING TIME RELATED PARAMETER VALUES FOR A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKMay 2021February 2024Allow3320YesNo
17288263MOBILITY MANAGEMENT IN INFORMATION CENTRIC NETWORKINGApril 2021January 2024Allow3310NoNo
17193518SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RRC CONNECTION USING A RELAY TERMINALMarch 2021April 2024Allow3720YesNo
17269821METHOD, DEVICE AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR IAB TRANSMISSIONFebruary 2021January 2024Abandon3510NoNo
17168687INFORMATION TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SENDING OR RECEIVING JOINT INFORMATION OF UPLINK CONTROL INFORMATIONFebruary 2021January 2025Allow4830NoNo
17261443REFERENCE SIGNAL FOR REMOTE INTERFERENCE MANAGEMENTJanuary 2021December 2023Allow3420YesNo
17260978METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING INFORMATION FOR VEHICLES, SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM THEREOFJanuary 2021January 2024Allow3630NoNo
17260234BLUETOOTH DATA FORWARDING METHOD AND DEVICEJanuary 2021July 2024Allow4240NoNo
17255912TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING RANDOM ACCESSDecember 2020February 2024Allow3830YesNo
17123659SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO AUTOMATICALLY PERFORM ACTIONS BASED ON MEDIA CONTENTDecember 2020December 2024Abandon4840NoNo
17247012INSPECTION ROUTE COMMUNICATIONSNovember 2020October 2023Allow3520YesNo
17096851ON-BOARD SYNCHRONIZATION DEVICE AND SMART MACHINENovember 2020May 2023Allow3010NoNo
16945870Communication Processor Handling Communications Protocols on Separate ThreadsAugust 2020June 2024Allow4630YesNo
16945871Multi-Thread Wireless Communications Processor with Granular Thread ProcessesAugust 2020March 2024Allow4320YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner NGO, ANGELIE THIEN THAN - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner NGO, ANGELIE THIEN THAN works in Art Unit 2416 and has examined 40 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 77.5%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 34 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner NGO, ANGELIE THIEN THAN's allowance rate of 77.5% places them in the 37% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by NGO, ANGELIE THIEN THAN receive 2.08 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 69% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by NGO, ANGELIE THIEN THAN is 34 months. This places the examiner in the 23% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +25.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by NGO, ANGELIE THIEN THAN. This interview benefit is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 41.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 92% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 30.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 36% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 14% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.